Constitutional challenges

Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting Mail-In Voting

President Trump has signed an executive order mandating that the U.S. Postal Service only mail absentee/mail-in ballots to an approved list of eligible voters, requiring states to provide lists of these voters 60 days before federal elections. This order, titled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections,” also mandates that ballots be clearly marked and requires the U.S. attorney general to prosecute officials who issue ballots to ineligible individuals, with federal funding withheld from non-compliant governments. Four Democratic groups, along with Senate and House Minority Leaders, have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of this executive order, arguing it restricts voting rights and exceeds federal authority. Meanwhile, analysis of the earliest filing deadline states shows a downward trend in open legislative seats and an upward trend in contested incumbents for 2026. Additionally, Kentucky voters will decide on a ballot amendment in November to limit the governor’s pardon power, prohibiting its exercise within a specified period around gubernatorial elections.

Read More

Trump’s Illegal Orders: Power Grabs and Fabricated Emergencies

President Trump’s executive actions, including attempts to rescind birthright citizenship and utilize the Alien Enemies Act for mass deportation, faced immediate legal challenges and were deemed unconstitutional by a federal judge. His declared “national emergencies,” such as those concerning border security and energy prices, were criticized as mischaracterizations of ongoing policy issues rather than genuine crises. Many of his executive orders, including those targeting DEI initiatives and social media regulation, raised significant legal and constitutional questions. Ultimately, many of his actions appear more symbolic, driven by personal grievances and inconsistent policy positions, rather than a cohesive governing plan.

Read More