In response to declining public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court, as indicated by recent polling showing only 22% of Americans have faith in the institution, a new constitutional amendment has been proposed. This legislation, championed by Democratic Rep. Johnny Olszewski of Maryland, seeks to establish 18-year term limits for Supreme Court justices. Olszewski discussed the merits of this proposal, aiming to address concerns about the Court’s perceived politicization and ensure a more regular infusion of new perspectives.
Read More
North Korea has amended its constitution to mandate an automatic and immediate nuclear strike in retaliation for any attempt on leader Kim Jong Un’s life or if the nuclear command-and-control system is endangered. This constitutional revision, approved by the Supreme People’s Assembly, comes amidst heightened global tensions and follows the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The new provision explicitly states that if “hostile forces’ attacks” jeopardize the nuclear forces, a retaliatory strike will be launched without delay. This update underscores North Korea’s commitment to its nuclear arsenal and its hard-line stance toward perceived threats.
Read More
The notion that North Korea, under the leadership of Kim Jong-un, would unleash a nuclear weapon if he were assassinated by a foreign adversary is a chilling, albeit not entirely surprising, development. Recent reports suggest that North Korea has formally amended its constitution to mandate a retaliatory nuclear strike in precisely such a scenario. This constitutional change, according to briefings by South Korea’s National Intelligence Service, was apparently prompted by the targeted killings of Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, and many of his close advisors during joint US-Israeli attacks on Tehran. The intention seems clear: to deter any attempts at a decapitation strike against Kim and his inner circle by presenting a guaranteed, immediate, and catastrophic response.… Continue reading
Congressman Johnny Olszewski is introducing the Reform of Bench Eligibility (ROBE) Act, proposing an 18-year term limit for Supreme Court Justices to enhance the Court’s legitimacy. This initiative aims to address concerns about politicized appointments, strategically timed retirements, and ethically questionable conduct by justices, as exemplified by recent Supreme Court rulings and their attendance at White House events. The proposed amendment seeks to restore balance and integrity to the judiciary by ensuring a more regular and less politically charged system for selecting and serving on the bench.
Read More
Hungary’s main opposition party has put forward a compelling and potentially game-changing proposal: if they emerge victorious in the upcoming election, they intend to amend the constitution to institute term limits for prime ministers. This strategic move, should it come to fruition, would effectively bar the current incumbent, Viktor Orbán, from ever holding the office again. The idea behind term limits, and indeed democracy itself, is often rooted in the principle that no single individual should wield executive power indefinitely. Treating the highest executive office like a lifetime appointment, the argument goes, rarely bodes well for the citizens in the long run.… Continue reading
President’s pardon power to be curbed under new proposal. This is a topic that’s clearly stirring up a lot of opinions, and it’s easy to see why. The idea of limiting a president’s ability to pardon, especially after recent events, hits a nerve.
The core of the discussion revolves around the potential for abuse of power. Many feel the pardon power, as it currently stands, is ripe for misuse. There’s a strong sentiment that the ability to pardon should not be used for personal gain, political retribution, or to shield oneself from accountability. The recent instances, particularly the perception that pardons were granted in exchange for favors or loyalty, have fueled this concern.… Continue reading
Representative Mike Levin, a California Democrat, has announced his co-sponsorship of the Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act of 2025 (H.R. 1074), which proposes 18-year term limits for Supreme Court justices. The bill would establish a regular appointment schedule, with a new justice nominated every two years, and allow senior justices to continue performing judicial duties. However, the legislation faces significant constitutional hurdles, as Article III of the Constitution suggests that term limits would require a constitutional amendment. Despite Democratic support, the bill is unlikely to pass due to Republican opposition and is seen more as a political statement reflecting dissatisfaction with the court’s current ideological balance.
Read More
Proposed constitutional amendment would give Colorado governor emergency redistricting authority. Well, this is certainly a hot topic, and it seems to be stirring up some strong feelings among Coloradans and even folks from out of state. The central idea is pretty straightforward: a proposed constitutional amendment that would grant the Colorado governor the power to redraw congressional district lines under certain emergency circumstances.
Proposed constitutional amendment would give Colorado governor emergency redistricting authority. Now, the main trigger for this would be if there’s “substantial evidence” that other states have enacted congressional redistricting plans that lead to severe partisan imbalance. Think of it as a sort of reactive measure.… Continue reading
Former President Trump decried the Digital Equity Act as unconstitutional and racist, claiming it is a wasteful $2.5 billion giveaway. This assertion contradicts the Act’s language, which prohibits discrimination based on factors including race, mirroring the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Despite Trump’s claims, the program has already distributed grants to several conservative states. The Act aims to expand internet access, not to provide racial handouts.
Read More
Congresswoman Jayapal, along with over two dozen Democratic colleagues, introduced a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. This “We the People Amendment” seeks to revoke corporate constitutional rights and curtail the influence of massive political spending, exemplified by Elon Musk’s significant contributions to the Trump campaign. The amendment would mandate transparency in political contributions and expenditures at all governmental levels. Supporters argue this is a necessary systemic solution to counter the escalating power of corporations and the corrupting influence of dark money in politics.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood