Constitutional Amendment

House Dems Propose Citizens United Reversal

Congresswoman Jayapal, along with over two dozen Democratic colleagues, introduced a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. This “We the People Amendment” seeks to revoke corporate constitutional rights and curtail the influence of massive political spending, exemplified by Elon Musk’s significant contributions to the Trump campaign. The amendment would mandate transparency in political contributions and expenditures at all governmental levels. Supporters argue this is a necessary systemic solution to counter the escalating power of corporations and the corrupting influence of dark money in politics.

Read More

Jayapal’s Constitutional Amendment Aims to Overturn Citizens United

Representative Jayapal introduced the We the People Amendment, a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn Citizens United and end corporate personhood. The amendment seeks to curtail the undue influence of money in politics by explicitly stating that constitutional rights belong to human beings, not corporations. This would reverse the Citizens United ruling, which drastically increased corporate spending in elections, and mandate the public disclosure of all political contributions and expenditures. The amendment is supported by numerous co-sponsors and aims to restore democratic balance.

Read More

Nicaragua Grants President Ortega Absolute Power

A constitutional amendment in Nicaragua has granted President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Rosario Murillo, absolute power. The amendment elevates Murillo to “co-president” and places legislative, judicial, and supervisory control under their authority. This reform, proposed by Ortega himself, also extends presidential terms from five to six years. Critics, such as UN human rights experts, condemn this move as destroying the rule of law and fundamental freedoms. The changes solidify the Ortega-Murillo regime’s control over all branches of Nicaraguan government.

Read More

Trump’s Third Term “Joke”: A Serious Threat?

At a House Republican gathering, President Trump jokingly, yet repeatedly, suggested a third presidential term, prompting laughter from attendees. This follows a recent proposal by Rep. Andy Ogles to amend the Constitution to allow for a third term, citing Trump’s success in restoring American greatness. While Trump’s comments were treated as humor, they highlight the ongoing discussion surrounding term limits and his potential future role in politics. However, a constitutional amendment would be necessary for a third term, a prospect viewed as unlikely by some Republican senators.

Read More

GOP Bill Aims to Let Trump, Not Obama, Seek Third Term

Following President Trump’s suggestive comments about a potential 2028 run, Representative Andy Ogles introduced a resolution to amend the Constitution, enabling Trump to seek a third term. This proposal, while unlikely to pass, highlights the increasingly sycophantic nature of some Republicans, eager to appease the former president. The amendment’s specific language, barring presidents elected for two consecutive terms from a third run, exposes its partisan intent. This incident is part of a larger trend; Republicans are frequently introducing legislation mirroring Trump’s pronouncements, regardless of feasibility, to demonstrate loyalty and gain favor. This behavior points to a concerning normalization of personality-driven politics within the GOP.

Read More

Republicans Propose Constitutional Amendment for Trump’s Third Term

Representative Andy Ogles (R-TN) has introduced a joint resolution to amend the 22nd Amendment, enabling President Trump to serve a third term. This proposed amendment would allow up to three presidential terms, but prevents a third term after two consecutive terms. The resolution has drawn immediate criticism from Democrats, who highlight the unprecedented nature of the proposal and the potential for constitutional disruption. The amendment’s success requires significant congressional and state-level support, a high bar given its controversial nature.

Read More

Biden Declares ERA Ratified, Igniting Legal Showdown

President Biden declared the Equal Rights Amendment ratified, asserting that the necessary 38 states had voted in favor, despite past legal challenges and rescinded approvals. This action, intended to enshrine equal rights for women in the Constitution, relies on the American Bar Association’s interpretation that ratification deadlines are unenforceable. However, the Archivist of the United States has previously stated that certification is legally impossible, setting the stage for a likely court battle. The move comes as Biden uses his final days in office to enact numerous executive actions, some of which may be easily reversed by the incoming administration.

Read More

Biden Declares ERA Ratified, Sparking Legal and Political Firestorm

Virginia’s 2020 ratification marked the 38th state to approve the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), fulfilling the constitutional requirement for adoption. The American Bar Association and leading legal scholars concur that all necessary steps for ERA’s inclusion as the 28th Amendment have been completed. Therefore, the Amendment is deemed ratified and legally part of the U.S. Constitution, guaranteeing equal rights regardless of sex. This action upholds the will of the American people and fulfills a constitutional duty to ensure equal protection under the law.

Read More

Biden Urges Constitutional Amendment to End Presidential Immunity

President Biden advocates for a constitutional amendment explicitly removing presidential immunity from prosecution for crimes committed while in office. This proposed amendment aims to ensure accountability for all actions taken by a president, regardless of their position. The call for such an amendment follows ongoing debates about executive power and the rule of law. This initiative seeks to clarify and strengthen the principle of equal justice under the law.

Read More