Martin Hibbert and his daughter, severely injured in the Manchester Arena bombing, won a lawsuit against a YouTuber who falsely claimed the attack was staged and secretly filmed them. The YouTuber, Richard Hall, spread conspiracy theories across his 16-million-view YouTube channel, including claims that the Hibberts were “crisis actors.” The court condemned Hall’s actions as gravely unacceptable, awarding the family damages. Hibbert now advocates for “Eve’s Law,” a new criminal offense protecting victims of tragedy from online harassment by conspiracy theorists, and for improved legal access for such victims.
Read More
Finland’s decisive seizure of a ship following the severing of an undersea cable is a bold move that has garnered significant international attention. The swift action, without prior consultation with Russia, stands in stark contrast to previous incidents where suspected Russian involvement in similar acts resulted in diplomatic efforts that ultimately yielded little consequence. This time, Finland opted for direct action, seizing the vessel and setting a potential precedent for future responses to acts of suspected sabotage.
The seizure itself rests on a crucial legal point: the act of cutting an undersea cable is considered piracy under international law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).… Continue reading
Trump vehemently denies the circulating claims that he has relinquished the presidency to Elon Musk, labeling them a “hoax.” This denial, however, only seems to fuel the very speculation he’s trying to dismiss. The sheer force of his rebuttal suggests a level of concern far beyond a simple dismissal of a frivolous rumor.
The assertion that Trump ceded the presidency, rather than simply being bought or manipulated by Musk, hints at a more nuanced power dynamic. It suggests a deliberate transfer of authority, perhaps not legally binding, but certainly impactful in terms of influence and decision-making. The difference between “ceded” and “sold” implies a degree of agency on Trump’s part, while “sold” paints him as a mere commodity.… Continue reading
A temporary drone ban affecting 22 New Jersey cities is in effect until January 17th, authorizing the use of deadly force against unmanned aircraft posing an imminent threat. This action follows weeks of unexplained drone sightings near critical infrastructure, prompting public concern and conspiracy theories. While the White House and Congress have downplayed the threat, the ban restricts drone operation below 400 feet, with exceptions for certain governmental and commercial operations. Investigations are ongoing, despite assertions that many sightings involved ordinary aircraft.
Read More
RFK Jr.’s relentless pursuit to prove the CIA assassinated his uncle, JFK, is a complex and controversial undertaking. The very fact that he’s embarking on this investigation, regardless of its outcome, raises significant questions. Some see it as a desperate attempt to gain relevance, fueled by a long-standing family narrative and perhaps a personal need for validation. Others believe that this is a genuine investigation, albeit one clouded by potential biases.
This “investigation,” as it’s being framed, immediately invites scrutiny. The inherent danger lies in the potential for confirmation bias—seeking out evidence that supports a pre-existing belief while ignoring contradictory information.… Continue reading
Kash Patel, Donald Trump’s FBI director nominee, lacks FBI experience but is a prominent figure in Trump’s sphere, frequently appearing on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast. Patel’s appearances reveal a worldview steeped in conspiracy theories targeting Democrats and Trump’s perceived enemies, mirroring the tactics of J. Edgar Hoover. He advocates for extreme measures against political opponents, including proposals to unilaterally arrest Attorney General Merrick Garland. This behavior, regardless of Patel’s personal beliefs, positions him as a potential threat to democratic norms if given power.
Read More
A House Oversight hearing examined FEMA’s hurricane response, focusing on a dismissed employee’s alleged instruction to avoid assisting Trump supporters during recovery efforts. Rep. Krishnamoorthi used his questioning to directly refute Republican-spread conspiracy theories claiming FEMA controls weather patterns or targets specific locations for political reasons. FEMA Administrator Criswell firmly denied these allegations. The hearing also acknowledged FEMA’s substantial disaster relief efforts, assisting over 35,000 households during recent hurricanes.
Read More
Donald Trump’s nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services has sparked widespread outrage due to Kennedy’s history of promoting anti-vaccine rhetoric and other debunked health claims. Public health experts and organizations have condemned the nomination, citing Kennedy’s lack of medical training and his dangerous, evidence-free pronouncements on issues like vaccines and fluoride. The appointment, seen as a potential public health catastrophe, comes amidst concerns that Kennedy’s influence could undermine crucial public health initiatives and potentially lead to a resurgence of preventable diseases.
Read More
The satirical news website The Onion has won the bankruptcy auction for control of Alex Jones’ media empire, including the far-right conspiracy website Infowars. The Onion plans to shutter Jones’ platform and rebuild it with its own humor writers, effectively ending Jones’ ability to spread harmful conspiracy theories. This move, supported by families of Sandy Hook victims who Jones defamed, aims to hold Jones accountable for his actions and prevent further harm. The sale of Infowars comes after Jones was found liable for defamation and ordered to pay nearly $1.5 billion in damages to the families.
Read More
The recent election has ignited a wave of conspiracy theories on both the left and right, primarily fueled by a drop-off in Democratic votes. Many voters on the left are expressing bewilderment and frustration, unable to reconcile the outcome with the perceived strength of the Democratic campaign. They cite anecdotes about problems with mail-in ballots, missing votes, and discrepancies in vote counts as evidence of something amiss. The prevailing sentiment is that the election results don’t seem to make sense, particularly given the historical voting patterns and the relative strength of the Democratic candidates.
On the other side of the political spectrum, many Republicans, particularly those aligned with the former President, see the election as a victory for their party and a validation of their own narratives.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood