During a Kennedy Center concert, Vice President JD Vance was met with boos and jeers from the audience, a highly unusual display of political protest in a classical music setting. The incident follows Donald Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center, including the appointment of Vance’s wife to the board and subsequent changes impacting programming. This controversial restructuring has sparked widespread resistance, including artist cancellations and protests against the perceived suppression of artistic expression. The outburst against Vance reflects broader cultural tensions and opposition to the new leadership’s conservative agenda.
Read More
The cancellation of Hamilton’s Kennedy Center run, a decision directly attributed to the Trump administration’s takeover of the institution, has ignited a firestorm of controversy. This isn’t simply a scheduling conflict; it’s a symbolic clash between artistic expression and political power, raising serious questions about the future of the arts under a conservative agenda.
The outrage is palpable. Many see this as a blatant attempt to silence dissenting voices and impose a specific, partisan viewpoint on a national cultural landmark. The Kennedy Center, historically a beacon of artistic excellence and inclusivity, is now viewed by many as a potential instrument of political manipulation, its programming potentially skewed to favor a specific ideology.… Continue reading
President Trump’s first day back in office saw him sign numerous executive orders, a significant portion of which directly mirrored proposals from the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. This policy blueprint, previously distanced from by Trump, includes actions such as withdrawing from international agreements and boosting domestic oil production. The implementation of Project 2025 highlights the influence of conservative think tanks and their corporate backing in shaping the administration’s agenda. With Republican control of Congress, this conservative agenda will likely be swiftly enacted.
Read More
Despite publicly disavowing it, President-elect Trump’s re-election has emboldened his allies to openly embrace the extreme policy blueprint known as Project 2025. This document, authored by former Trump administration officials and published by the Heritage Foundation, outlines an authoritarian agenda that seeks to dismantle the federal government, replace career civil servants with Trump loyalists, and implement extreme policies on immigration, abortion, energy, and education. While some dismiss this celebration as online trolling, many of these figures are likely to hold positions of influence in the Trump administration, making Project 2025 a real threat to democratic norms and institutions.
Read More
While Trump has distanced himself from Project 2025, a far-reaching plan for his second term, several prominent figures within his sphere, including Steve Bannon and Matt Walsh, have openly acknowledged its existence and their intention to implement it. This plan, created by the Heritage Foundation, outlines extreme policies like banning abortion pills, surveilling abortion access, and weakening environmental regulations, potentially alienating even some members of Trump’s base. These actions raise concerns about the true extent of Trump’s agenda and the potential consequences of its implementation, particularly given the negative public perception of Project 2025 among Republican voters.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s election defeat, MAGA allies, including Steve Bannon and Matt Walsh, are openly boasting about “Project 2025,” a 900-page blueprint for a Trump second term. This plan, endorsed by the Heritage Foundation and former Trump administration officials, outlines a radical agenda including expanded executive authority, anti-abortion policies, and an anti-immigrant stance. Despite attempting to distance himself from the project during the campaign, Trump’s close ties to its authors and its alignment with his administration’s policies suggest its influence on his future actions.
Read More
When I first read about Project 2025’s disturbing directive to execute every remaining federal death row prisoner and expand the types of crimes punishable by death, I was filled with a sense of horror and dread. The idea of an “execution spree” under a potential Trump administration is beyond chilling; it’s a nightmare scenario that seems straight out of a dystopian novel. The fact that this plan is buried within an 887-page document is even more unsettling, highlighting the calculated and secretive nature of these extreme conservative groups.
The implications of such a plan are profound and deeply troubling. Gene Hamilton’s call for “finality” for every federal death row prisoner and the pursuit of the death penalty for crimes involving violence and sexual abuse of children is a reflection of a dark and twisted ideology.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood