In light of King Charles’ recent decision to strip Andrew of his title, several Democrat members of the US House Oversight Committee have renewed their calls for Andrew to testify about his association with Jeffrey Epstein. These calls for testimony come from members who believe Andrew possesses crucial information and should cooperate with the investigation. The members believe Andrew’s testimony would not only help survivors but also prevent future occurrences of similar offenses. Despite the challenges of compelling testimony from someone outside the US, the committee members have indicated they would be willing to formally subpoena Andrew if he were to enter the United States.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested the opportunity to testify publicly before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees in response to accusations of politically motivated prosecutions from House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan. Smith’s legal team stated his willingness to address allegations surrounding his investigations into former President Trump, contingent on Justice Department guidance to avoid violating grand jury secrecy. This request comes as Jordan demanded a closed-door interview with Smith, claiming the special counsel aimed to silence Trump. Notably, Smith recently defended his team’s apolitical nature and commitment to public service in an interview with former prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.
Read More
Former special counsel Jack Smith is seeking to testify publicly before Congress about the investigations leading to criminal charges against Donald Trump. Smith believes public hearings are necessary due to “mischaracterizations” surrounding his work and wants to defend the integrity of his investigations. However, Smith requires assurances from the Justice Department that he won’t face repercussions for revealing information still under seal or protected by grand jury secrecy. Furthermore, Smith is requesting access to files created during his tenure as special counsel to ensure full and accurate answers.
Read More
Comer agrees to postpone Maxwell’s testimony to House on Epstein. That’s the headline, and it feels like a sigh of inevitability, doesn’t it? The immediate reaction is a sense of déjà vu, as if we’ve seen this particular movie before. The consensus seems to be that this delay wasn’t exactly a surprise. It’s perceived by many as a tactic, a way to buy time and hopefully make the whole situation fade from public consciousness. The unspoken assumption is that the powers that be are more interested in making this go away than uncovering the truth.
The fear is that the postponement is just a prelude to something more sinister.… Continue reading
Users reported various issues related to video advertisements, highlighting problems with loading speeds and functionality. Many experienced slow loading times for video content, while others reported ads that froze or failed to load completely. Furthermore, some users encountered issues such as video content not starting after an ad and excessively loud audio levels within the advertisements. These problems ultimately suggest widespread frustration with the quality and user experience of the ads.
Read More
This week, Secretary Hegseth will testify before Congress three times regarding the Pentagon budget, despite its absence from Congressional records. The White House has actively supported Hegseth, assisting with staffing, though disqualifying some candidates deemed insufficiently “MAGA.” However, controversies surround Hegseth, including the dismissal of several senior advisors following an alleged leak investigation and the sharing of sensitive information on a private messaging app. Despite these setbacks, Hegseth has achieved successes including eliminating DEI programs and boosting military recruitment.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard faced intense scrutiny after conflicting testimonies regarding a private Signal group chat containing sensitive war plans. Gabbard initially denied knowledge of classified information shared within the chat, but later attributed this to faulty memory. Her explanation was met with sharp criticism from both lawmakers and the public, who highlighted inconsistencies between her Senate and House testimony. The released texts, which detailed specific attack plans, revealed the presence of top-secret information, including target locations, aircraft types, and weaponry. Gabbard acknowledged the chat’s sensitive nature and that a reporter was inadvertently added.
Read More
A House Democrat has labeled Elon Musk a “coward” if he refuses to testify before Congress. This assertion highlights a growing tension between the legislative branch and a powerful figure who seems increasingly resistant to accountability. The sentiment underscores the frustration felt by some lawmakers regarding Musk’s perceived unwillingness to engage with oversight processes.
The gravity of the situation lies in the potential implications for transparency and government oversight. A refusal to testify suggests a disregard for established democratic norms, raising concerns about unchecked power and influence. The potential consequences extend beyond the immediate issue at hand, impacting public trust in both government institutions and influential private entities.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood