Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent admission that she didn’t read the massive spending bill she voted for highlights a concerning lack of diligence in the legislative process. Her statement, “I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there,” speaks volumes about her approach to her duties as a representative. It raises serious questions not only about her competence but also about the entire process of lawmaking when such significant legislation is passed without thorough review by those voting on it.
The sheer scale of the bill, often referred to as a “mega bill,” undoubtedly contributes to the problem.… Continue reading
The U.S. Judicial Conference declined to refer ethics complaints against Justices Thomas and Jackson to the Justice Department, citing the lack of clarity on whether such referrals are permissible and noting ongoing external investigations. Justice Thomas will adhere to updated disclosure guidelines for gifts and hospitality, addressing concerns about unreported luxury trips. Justice Jackson has already amended her disclosures. The Conference’s inaction underscores the need for Congress to establish a more robust mechanism for investigating judicial ethics violations.
Read More
Downsizing the federal workforce faces significant hurdles, including robust civil service protections and collective bargaining agreements. Proposed solutions like Schedule F, while impacting policymaking roles, offer limited fiscal savings. Ultimately, only Congress possesses the authority to drastically restructure the federal government, a power theoretically within the reach of the current Republican majority. However, any such endeavor risks being largely duplicative of existing proposals and ultimately unproductive.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker