Senator Warren’s assertion that Democrats don’t need to wait for court intervention to challenge Trump-era tariffs highlights a crucial point about the balance of power in American government. The implication is that Congress possesses the authority to directly address these tariffs, and shouldn’t passively wait for judicial review. This proactive approach is vital, especially given the potential for significant economic and social harm stemming from these policies.
The argument implicitly criticizes the perceived inaction of Congress in the face of what are seen as damaging presidential actions. The suggestion is that Congress has a responsibility to actively check and balance presidential power, particularly where economic policies with far-reaching consequences are concerned.… Continue reading
The House passed a partisan budget disguised as a continuing resolution, achieving Republican goals while significantly diminishing Congress’s power. This bill cuts non-defense spending, zeroes out funding for crucial social programs, and increases military spending and presidential leeway over funds. Several Senate Democrats are considering supporting it despite its flaws, prioritizing avoidance of a government shutdown over upholding Congress’s constitutional role. This decision risks enabling a de facto government shutdown orchestrated by the executive branch, bypassing Congress’s authority over federal spending. The potential for a Trump administration to unilaterally cut funding makes this a critical moment for Senate Democrats.
Read More
Elon Musk, operating outside Congressional approval, has seized control of US Treasury payments, halting USAID operations. This action, supported by many Republicans, constitutes an unconstitutional seizure of Congress’s “power of the purse,” as legal experts argue the president can only temporarily delay payments, not unilaterally alter spending. Conservative scholars express alarm, warning that this sets a dangerous precedent, potentially empowering the executive branch over the legislative branch and undermining the foundational principles of the Constitution. The situation is further complicated by the Trump administration’s apparent intention to challenge the established legal framework of impoundment. The lack of Congressional resistance to this action exacerbates the crisis.
Read More
A Democratic senator has declared he will actively obstruct the confirmation process for Trump-nominated individuals until the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is fully restored. This bold move underscores a growing frustration among some Democrats with what they perceive as the erosion of established governance norms and the unchecked power of the executive branch. The senator’s action is a direct response to what many see as a blatant disregard for Congressional authority and the systematic dismantling of a crucial government agency.
The senator’s strategy hinges on leveraging his position within the confirmation process to pressure the administration into reversing course.… Continue reading
Democrats are questioning the legality of a Trump-initiated freeze on federal grants, a move they see as a direct challenge to the fundamental principles of American governance. The core of their concern lies in the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. The power of the purse, the ability to control government spending, is explicitly granted to Congress. This isn’t a nuanced legal interpretation; it’s a foundational principle, a cornerstone of checks and balances designed to prevent executive overreach. Trump’s actions are perceived as a blatant attempt to seize this power, effectively transforming the presidency into a monarchy.
This isn’t simply a matter of disagreeing with a policy decision.… Continue reading
Rep. Rosa DeLauro warns that President-elect Trump’s plan to utilize impoundment—the unilateral withholding of congressionally appropriated funds—is unconstitutional and would harm vital social programs. This strategy, supported by some Republicans and advocated by Musk and Ramaswamy, directly contradicts the Constitution’s grant of “power of the purse” to Congress. Legal precedents, including the 1974 Impoundment Control Act and Supreme Court rulings, firmly establish that the president lacks this authority. DeLauro highlights the potential devastating impact on programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and other crucial services for middle- and lower-income families.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker