Congressional Oversight

GOP Rep. Bacon Calls for Limiting Trump’s Tariff Powers: A Mistake Admitted?

President Trump’s escalating tariffs on imported goods, including a forthcoming duty on vehicles, are causing unease among some Republicans. Concerns are rising over potential price increases and a resulting voter backlash, leading some GOP lawmakers to advocate for returning tariff authority to Congress. While some Republicans remain optimistic about the long-term benefits, the Congressional Budget Office predicts short-term negative impacts on consumers and businesses due to increased prices and economic inefficiency. This internal party division highlights the significant economic and political ramifications of the President’s tariff strategy.

Read More

Min Introduces Bill to Repeal Trump’s DOGE Executive Order

Rep. Dave Min introduces a bill, the BAD DOGE Act, aiming to repeal President Trump’s executive order establishing DOGE. This bold move seeks to dismantle what the representative and his cosponsors see as an unconstitutional power grab, asserting that Elon Musk’s involvement in DOGE violates fundamental principles of governance.

The bill’s introduction is framed as a necessary response to what is described as a blatant disregard for the separation of powers, federal labor laws, and Congressional authority. The argument presented is that DOGE’s actions are undermining essential government functions, leading to job losses and the misappropriation of funds without proper Congressional oversight.… Continue reading

Pentagon Chief Ignores Congress, Restores Fort Benning Name

The Pentagon chief’s recent decision to restore the name of Fort Benning has ignited a firestorm of controversy, highlighting a growing tension between the executive and legislative branches of government. This move, perceived by many as a blatant disregard for a Congressional provision, raises serious questions about the balance of power and the future of American democracy.

The core issue lies in the Pentagon chief’s apparent circumvention of a Congressional mandate. While the specifics of the Congressional provision aren’t explicitly detailed, the general understanding is that it aimed to prevent military bases from bearing the names of Confederate figures. By reinstating the name “Fort Benning,” the Pentagon chief seems to have found a loophole, possibly by renaming the base after a different individual with the same surname who wasn’t associated with the Confederacy.… Continue reading

Crockett Slams Musk for Skipping DOGE Hearing: Dems Need Stronger Messaging

Representative Jasmine Crockett criticized Elon Musk for the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) actions, including budget cuts to crucial government programs and the firing of nuclear security personnel. Crockett highlighted Musk’s role in spreading misinformation and accused him of prioritizing personal financial gain over public service, citing substantial government contracts awarded to Musk’s companies, Tesla and SpaceX. She noted that DOGE employees, lacking democratic accountability, are demanding access to sensitive federal data. This mismanagement, Crockett argued, undermines public trust and confidence in the government.

Read More

$900 Million in Education Contracts Axed: A Political Power Grab or Necessary Spending Cut?

The Department of Government Efficiency announced the termination of approximately $881 million in Institute of Education Sciences (IES) contracts, impacting data collection and research capabilities. While the exact number of canceled contracts remains unclear, ranging from 89 to 170, the cuts severely hinder IES’s ability to produce congressionally mandated reports and provide crucial data to policymakers and researchers. This includes loss of online access to vital education data sets, forcing researchers to utilize outdated methods, and halting grant review panels. The consequences include delays in research, undermining evidence-based policymaking, and a significant reduction in available data on K-12 and higher education.

Read More

Democratic Lawmakers Denied Entry to Department of Education

Democratic members of Congress were denied access to the Department of Education, sparking outrage and raising serious questions about the separation of powers. This incident highlights a concerning trend of executive branch overreach and the apparent lack of effective response from the legislative branch. The situation unfolded when a group of Democratic lawmakers arrived at the Department of Education seeking a meeting with the acting secretary.

Their visit followed the sending of a letter signed by numerous members of Congress, demanding action against potential executive orders. Notably, the lawmakers were not given any explanation for the denial of entry, leaving them to depart after a period of waiting.… Continue reading

Congress Denied Entry to USAID: Musk’s Actions Spark Outrage

Following President Trump’s executive order, USAID, a $40 billion agency managing global aid, was effectively shut down by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Democratic lawmakers were denied entry to the agency’s headquarters after DOGE personnel accessed USAID’s computer systems, prompting accusations of illegal actions and a violation of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. Secretary of State Marco Rubio now claims acting administrative control over USAID, citing the agency’s purported failure to align with national strategy. The incident has sparked widespread outrage and initiated investigations into potential breaches of classified information.

Read More

Democratic Senators Seek to Curb Trump’s Tariff Power

Sens. Coons and Kaine introduced the STABLE Trade Policy Act, requiring congressional approval for presidential tariffs on allies and trading partners. The bill mandates presidential justification for such tariffs, detailing their economic and foreign policy impacts. This legislation directly counters President Trump’s announced 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, which he justifies based on immigration and trade deficits. The senators argue these tariffs constitute an abuse of power, potentially harming U.S. relationships and consumer costs.

Read More