In response to President Trump’s new tariffs, a House Republican plans to introduce legislation limiting the White House’s ability to impose tariffs without Congressional approval. This bill, mirroring a bipartisan Senate proposal, would require the President to inform Congress within 48 hours of any new tariff, providing reasoning and impact analysis. Congress would then have 60 days to approve the tariff or it would expire. While facing challenges in the House, the bill has garnered initial support and could gain momentum depending on the economic impact of the new tariffs. The legislation underscores the constitutional debate over Congress’s authority on tariffs and taxes.
Read More
Seven Republican senators have signed onto a bill designed to curb President Trump’s trade authority, marking a notable development in the ongoing debate over his trade policies. This action signals a potential shift within the GOP, indicating that not all members are entirely aligned with the former president’s aggressive trade tactics. The fact that this many senators are willing to publicly challenge Trump’s approach, even if it’s potentially a symbolic gesture at this stage, is significant.
This bipartisan effort to rein in Trump’s executive power regarding trade is noteworthy. It suggests a growing recognition among some Republicans of the potential negative consequences of his trade wars, including the economic damage inflicted on various sectors.… Continue reading
House Republicans are proposing a bill designed to give Congress the power to block tariffs imposed by the President. This legislation, framed as a mechanism for congressional oversight, aims to curtail the executive branch’s authority in setting trade policy, particularly focusing on the controversial tariffs implemented during the Trump administration.
The bill’s core mechanism involves a 60-day review period. Any tariffs imposed by the President would automatically expire after 60 days unless Congress explicitly approves them via a resolution. Furthermore, Congress could proactively overturn existing tariffs at any time through a resolution of disapproval. This structure attempts to balance the need for swift executive action in certain circumstances with the crucial role of Congress in shaping national economic policy.… Continue reading
Sens. Grassley and Cantwell’s bipartisan bill seeks to increase congressional oversight of presidential tariffs. The legislation mandates congressional approval for tariffs lasting beyond 60 days. Further, it necessitates presidential notification to Congress within 48 hours of any tariff announcement. This measure aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the tariff-setting process. Senator Cantwell further elaborated on these points in an interview with José Díaz-Balart.
Read More
President Trump’s escalating tariffs on imported goods, including a forthcoming duty on vehicles, are causing unease among some Republicans. Concerns are rising over potential price increases and a resulting voter backlash, leading some GOP lawmakers to advocate for returning tariff authority to Congress. While some Republicans remain optimistic about the long-term benefits, the Congressional Budget Office predicts short-term negative impacts on consumers and businesses due to increased prices and economic inefficiency. This internal party division highlights the significant economic and political ramifications of the President’s tariff strategy.
Read More
Rep. Dave Min introduces a bill, the BAD DOGE Act, aiming to repeal President Trump’s executive order establishing DOGE. This bold move seeks to dismantle what the representative and his cosponsors see as an unconstitutional power grab, asserting that Elon Musk’s involvement in DOGE violates fundamental principles of governance.
The bill’s introduction is framed as a necessary response to what is described as a blatant disregard for the separation of powers, federal labor laws, and Congressional authority. The argument presented is that DOGE’s actions are undermining essential government functions, leading to job losses and the misappropriation of funds without proper Congressional oversight.… Continue reading
The Pentagon chief’s recent decision to restore the name of Fort Benning has ignited a firestorm of controversy, highlighting a growing tension between the executive and legislative branches of government. This move, perceived by many as a blatant disregard for a Congressional provision, raises serious questions about the balance of power and the future of American democracy.
The core issue lies in the Pentagon chief’s apparent circumvention of a Congressional mandate. While the specifics of the Congressional provision aren’t explicitly detailed, the general understanding is that it aimed to prevent military bases from bearing the names of Confederate figures. By reinstating the name “Fort Benning,” the Pentagon chief seems to have found a loophole, possibly by renaming the base after a different individual with the same surname who wasn’t associated with the Confederacy.… Continue reading
Representative Jasmine Crockett criticized Elon Musk for the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) actions, including budget cuts to crucial government programs and the firing of nuclear security personnel. Crockett highlighted Musk’s role in spreading misinformation and accused him of prioritizing personal financial gain over public service, citing substantial government contracts awarded to Musk’s companies, Tesla and SpaceX. She noted that DOGE employees, lacking democratic accountability, are demanding access to sensitive federal data. This mismanagement, Crockett argued, undermines public trust and confidence in the government.
Read More
The Department of Government Efficiency announced the termination of approximately $881 million in Institute of Education Sciences (IES) contracts, impacting data collection and research capabilities. While the exact number of canceled contracts remains unclear, ranging from 89 to 170, the cuts severely hinder IES’s ability to produce congressionally mandated reports and provide crucial data to policymakers and researchers. This includes loss of online access to vital education data sets, forcing researchers to utilize outdated methods, and halting grant review panels. The consequences include delays in research, undermining evidence-based policymaking, and a significant reduction in available data on K-12 and higher education.
Read More
Democratic members of Congress were denied access to the Department of Education, sparking outrage and raising serious questions about the separation of powers. This incident highlights a concerning trend of executive branch overreach and the apparent lack of effective response from the legislative branch. The situation unfolded when a group of Democratic lawmakers arrived at the Department of Education seeking a meeting with the acting secretary.
Their visit followed the sending of a letter signed by numerous members of Congress, demanding action against potential executive orders. Notably, the lawmakers were not given any explanation for the denial of entry, leaving them to depart after a period of waiting.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood