The appointment of Tesla alum Thomas Shedd as director of the Technology Transformation Services (TTS) has prompted significant internal upheaval. Unidentified individuals, lacking official government credentials, have been conducting reviews of TTS code and projects, raising concerns about data security and potential conflicts of interest. Shedd, emphasizing cost-cutting and efficiency, has initiated employee meetings focused on project successes and obstacles, requesting access to sensitive information. This situation highlights the potential risks associated with the merging of Silicon Valley practices and sensitive government operations.
Read More
In his second term, President Trump rescinded ethics rules implemented by his predecessor, lifting restrictions on executive branch employees accepting gifts from lobbyists and transitioning between lobbying and government positions. Simultaneously, the Trump Organization has implemented a voluntary agreement limiting foreign government deals, while the president and his wife pursue lucrative personal ventures. Critics condemn these actions as blatant conflicts of interest, prioritizing personal profit over the needs of the American people. This represents a stark contrast to Trump’s initial “drain the swamp” campaign promise and his earlier, albeit short-lived, stricter ethics order.
Read More
While Republicans aggressively investigated the Bidens’ business dealings, President Trump’s launch of a cryptocurrency, $TRUMP, along with his wife’s $MELANIA coin, has sparked ethical concerns and accusations of conflicts of interest. Despite the coins’ rapid rise and fall in value, and criticisms from Democrats and some Republicans, GOP lawmakers largely dismissed the issue, citing free-market principles. Experts warn of potential violations of the emoluments clause and opportunities for quid pro quo arrangements. The focus remains on the Bidens, rather than on addressing Trump’s apparent conflicts.
Read More
The Laken Riley Act, passed by Congress with bipartisan support, expands mandatory detention for undocumented immigrants accused of crimes, even minor ones. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez decried the bill as a “right-wing power grab,” alleging it funnels billions of taxpayer dollars to private prisons while undermining core American values like the presumption of innocence. This follows President Trump’s reversal of an executive order phasing out private prison contracts, leading to a significant increase in private prison stock values. Critics argue the bill represents a lucrative “sweetheart deal” for the private prison industry, exploiting a tragic death for profit.
Read More
Elon Musk’s DOGE, a purported “Department of Government Efficiency,” is facing a lawsuit mere minutes after President Trump’s inauguration. The lawsuit, a 30-page complaint filed by a public interest law firm, alleges that DOGE violates a 1972 law mandating transparency and adherence to specific rules for executive branch advisory committees. This legal challenge promises to be a significant battle over the incoming administration’s agenda, focusing on DOGE’s operational transparency and compliance with existing federal regulations.
The core of the legal argument centers on the alleged breach of a 1972 law governing advisory committees. This legislation outlines specific requirements for disclosure, hiring practices, and other operational aspects.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s newly launched cryptocurrency, $Trump, rapidly gained a market cap exceeding $6.5 billion before settling around $4.7 billion. The coin’s launch coincided with a pre-inauguration “Crypto Ball” and features Trump’s companies holding 80% of the tokens, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Disclosures state the coin is non-political, despite Trump’s plans to prioritize cryptocurrency as president-elect. The significant holdings by Trump’s companies have fueled comparisons to “pump and dump” schemes.
Read More
Pam Bondi, former Florida Attorney General and a Trump appointee, reportedly profited handsomely from the Truth Social merger, amassing at least $3 million according to recently released financial filings. This revelation adds another layer to the already complex narrative surrounding her career and her close ties to Donald Trump.
The substantial financial gain raises immediate questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly considering her previous role as Attorney General and her subsequent involvement in Trump’s inner circle. Her significant financial windfall from the merger, seemingly coinciding with her association with Trump, fuels concerns about undue influence and cronyism within the highest echelons of power.… Continue reading
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Trump regarding a former law clerk’s job application, a conversation that occurred before Trump filed an emergency appeal to delay his sentencing. Alito stated the call did not involve Trump’s pending case or any other matter before the Supreme Court. While recommending former clerks for positions is common, this instance is notable given the timing and the potential for criticism regarding the Court’s independence. The call has already drawn renewed scrutiny of Alito’s conduct.
Read More
Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrency presents a glaring red flag, raising serious concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the overall stability of the financial system. His history of financial dealings, marked by bankruptcies and accusations of money laundering, casts a long shadow over any crypto-related initiatives he might undertake. The sheer scale of his potential influence, coupled with his past behavior, suggests a high likelihood of manipulation and exploitation.
The inherent volatility of the cryptocurrency market presents a substantial risk. Trump’s involvement could exacerbate this volatility, leading to potentially devastating consequences for ordinary investors. His track record suggests a propensity for prioritizing personal gain over the interests of the wider economy, increasing the risk of a “pump and dump” scheme on a national scale, with taxpayers ultimately bearing the losses.… Continue reading
Vivek Ramaswamy’s past criticisms of Elon Musk’s relationship with China, highlighting potential conflicts of interest, remain relevant. Musk’s failure to disclose meetings with foreign leaders, as required by his security clearance, has resulted in multiple flags from US government agencies. Furthermore, Musk’s significant debt to Chinese state-controlled banks, incurred to fund Tesla’s Shanghai gigafactory, raises concerns about potential Chinese influence. This debt is particularly problematic given China’s legal ability to demand information from companies operating within its borders. These factors collectively raise serious questions about Musk’s allegiances and potential national security implications.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood