Internal FAA directives, largely undocumented, indicate a shift towards a multi-million dollar Starlink contract, potentially replacing Verizon’s existing $2.4 billion deal for airspace management system upgrades. This action follows a controversial purge of FAA staff under Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, raising significant conflict-of-interest concerns given SpaceX’s substantial government contracts and past regulatory violations. Musk claims Starlink terminals are being provided at no cost, though the details of the contract remain unclear. The situation is further complicated by Musk’s assertions regarding Verizon’s system functionality.
Read More
This article is protected by copyright and all rights are reserved by Fortune Media IP Limited. Use of this site is governed by its Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The FORTUNE trademark is registered in the U.S. and other countries. The site may contain affiliate links, and offers are subject to change.
Read More
Starlink, Elon Musk’s SpaceX satellite internet service, is poised to potentially acquire a significant FAA contract for air traffic control system upgrades, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. This follows Musk’s public criticism of the current Verizon system and the FAA’s confirmation of Starlink testing at several facilities. Experts and lawmakers express worry about potential undue influence stemming from Musk’s relationship with President Trump, emphasizing the importance of objective contracting decisions based on taxpayer interests. The situation highlights the complexities of government contracting when individuals with close ties to the administration also hold substantial business interests.
Read More
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is undertaking reforms at the FAA following recent air travel accidents, despite Musk’s apparent lack of understanding of basic flight operations. His recent questioning of a seemingly standard flight path highlights a potential lack of expertise in air traffic management. This comes after DOGE’s dismissal of numerous FAA employees, raising concerns about the safety implications of these personnel cuts. Simultaneously, SpaceX is poised to replace Verizon in upgrading the FAA’s IT systems, creating a conflict of interest. Experts caution against Musk’s approach, emphasizing the complexity and established safety protocols within the air traffic system.
Read More
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will use SpaceX’s Starlink internet system to upgrade its aging IT networks, a move raising concerns about conflicts of interest given Elon Musk’s role in recommending federal spending cuts, including those to the FAA. This contract, potentially involving thousands of Starlink terminals, comes amidst Musk’s efforts to reduce government spending and staffing. Critics cite Musk’s multiple business interests regulated by various federal agencies, highlighting potential ethical issues. The FAA’s justification centers on improving unreliable communications, particularly in Alaska, and addressing urgent modernization needs identified by the Government Accountability Office.
Read More
President Trump’s golfing expenses are projected to exceed $100 million in 2025, based on an estimated $10.7 million spent in the first month alone. This calculation uses a 2019 Government Accountability Office report, extrapolating the cost of Mar-a-Lago trips and considering Trump’s frequent golfing at his own properties. Critics argue this constitutes wasteful spending and potentially enriches the president personally. This spending pattern, exceeding $152 million during his first term, raises concerns about ethical conflicts of interest.
Read More
Since resuming the presidency, Donald Trump has already spent $10.7 million in taxpayer funds on golf trips, a cost seemingly overlooked by his own “Department of Government Efficiency.” These expenses, projected to continue weekly, have not been flagged by Trump’s purported “waste, fraud, and abuse” investigators despite exceeding seven figures per trip. Critics argue this demonstrates a clear conflict of interest, as Trump profits from directing government spending to his own for-profit businesses. This practice, amounting to roughly one-third of his days in office spent at his own resorts, vastly surpasses the travel expenses incurred by his predecessor.
Read More
Elon Musk’s actions as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are raising serious legal and ethical concerns. Multiple lawsuits allege Musk’s unchecked power over the executive branch violates democratic principles, citing budget cuts, firings, and contract cancellations benefiting his businesses. The absence of ethics officials and oversight mechanisms allows Musk to operate with apparent impunity, disregarding conflict-of-interest laws. This situation highlights a concerning lack of accountability, with Musk’s actions potentially constituting an illegal takeover of government functions.
Read More
Elon Musk’s SpaceX receives billions in NASA funding, creating a significant conflict of interest as Musk now advocates for NASA audits. This move follows a pattern of Musk seeking government cost reductions. The potential implications of this action are substantial and raise concerns about transparency and fairness. The situation underscores the complex relationship between private companies and government agencies.
Read More
Despite being classified as a special government employee and legally required to publicly file ethics forms disclosing his finances and conflicts of interest, Elon Musk’s forms are absent from the federal ethics website. Ethics experts contend that Musk, heading the White House’s Department of Government Efficiency, must comply with the same disclosure requirements as Cabinet officials. While the White House claims Musk is compliant, the lack of publicly available documentation raises concerns, particularly given Musk’s extensive business holdings with potential government overlaps. Senator Adam Schiff has requested clarification on this matter. The firing of the head of the Office of Government Ethics further intensified scrutiny.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker