Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is reportedly exerting significant influence over multiple federal agencies, including the Treasury Department and the Office of Personnel Management. DOGE officials have clashed with career civil servants over access to sensitive systems controlling trillions of dollars in federal funds and have reportedly restricted employee access to sensitive data. This actions contradict DOGE’s initial purpose as an external advisory body and represent an unprecedented level of private sector control over government operations. The situation mirrors the chaos that followed Musk’s Twitter acquisition, raising serious concerns about potential conflicts of interest and misuse of power.
Read More
Trump Media & Technology Group awarded 25,946 shares of its stock to six board members, including FBI director nominee Kash Patel and Donald Trump Jr., at no cost. These shares, valued at over $779,400 based on Tuesday’s closing price, were granted as compensation for services rendered since the company’s March IPO and are subject to vesting restrictions. The award was disclosed hours after Patel’s Senate confirmation hearing. This action has drawn criticism amidst concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest within the Trump administration.
Read More
The appointment of Tesla alum Thomas Shedd as director of the Technology Transformation Services (TTS) has prompted significant internal upheaval. Unidentified individuals, lacking official government credentials, have been conducting reviews of TTS code and projects, raising concerns about data security and potential conflicts of interest. Shedd, emphasizing cost-cutting and efficiency, has initiated employee meetings focused on project successes and obstacles, requesting access to sensitive information. This situation highlights the potential risks associated with the merging of Silicon Valley practices and sensitive government operations.
Read More
In his second term, President Trump rescinded ethics rules implemented by his predecessor, lifting restrictions on executive branch employees accepting gifts from lobbyists and transitioning between lobbying and government positions. Simultaneously, the Trump Organization has implemented a voluntary agreement limiting foreign government deals, while the president and his wife pursue lucrative personal ventures. Critics condemn these actions as blatant conflicts of interest, prioritizing personal profit over the needs of the American people. This represents a stark contrast to Trump’s initial “drain the swamp” campaign promise and his earlier, albeit short-lived, stricter ethics order.
Read More
While Republicans aggressively investigated the Bidens’ business dealings, President Trump’s launch of a cryptocurrency, $TRUMP, along with his wife’s $MELANIA coin, has sparked ethical concerns and accusations of conflicts of interest. Despite the coins’ rapid rise and fall in value, and criticisms from Democrats and some Republicans, GOP lawmakers largely dismissed the issue, citing free-market principles. Experts warn of potential violations of the emoluments clause and opportunities for quid pro quo arrangements. The focus remains on the Bidens, rather than on addressing Trump’s apparent conflicts.
Read More
The Laken Riley Act, passed by Congress with bipartisan support, expands mandatory detention for undocumented immigrants accused of crimes, even minor ones. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez decried the bill as a “right-wing power grab,” alleging it funnels billions of taxpayer dollars to private prisons while undermining core American values like the presumption of innocence. This follows President Trump’s reversal of an executive order phasing out private prison contracts, leading to a significant increase in private prison stock values. Critics argue the bill represents a lucrative “sweetheart deal” for the private prison industry, exploiting a tragic death for profit.
Read More
Elon Musk’s DOGE, a purported “Department of Government Efficiency,” is facing a lawsuit mere minutes after President Trump’s inauguration. The lawsuit, a 30-page complaint filed by a public interest law firm, alleges that DOGE violates a 1972 law mandating transparency and adherence to specific rules for executive branch advisory committees. This legal challenge promises to be a significant battle over the incoming administration’s agenda, focusing on DOGE’s operational transparency and compliance with existing federal regulations.
The core of the legal argument centers on the alleged breach of a 1972 law governing advisory committees. This legislation outlines specific requirements for disclosure, hiring practices, and other operational aspects.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s newly launched cryptocurrency, $Trump, rapidly gained a market cap exceeding $6.5 billion before settling around $4.7 billion. The coin’s launch coincided with a pre-inauguration “Crypto Ball” and features Trump’s companies holding 80% of the tokens, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Disclosures state the coin is non-political, despite Trump’s plans to prioritize cryptocurrency as president-elect. The significant holdings by Trump’s companies have fueled comparisons to “pump and dump” schemes.
Read More
Pam Bondi, former Florida Attorney General and a Trump appointee, reportedly profited handsomely from the Truth Social merger, amassing at least $3 million according to recently released financial filings. This revelation adds another layer to the already complex narrative surrounding her career and her close ties to Donald Trump.
The substantial financial gain raises immediate questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly considering her previous role as Attorney General and her subsequent involvement in Trump’s inner circle. Her significant financial windfall from the merger, seemingly coinciding with her association with Trump, fuels concerns about undue influence and cronyism within the highest echelons of power.… Continue reading
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Trump regarding a former law clerk’s job application, a conversation that occurred before Trump filed an emergency appeal to delay his sentencing. Alito stated the call did not involve Trump’s pending case or any other matter before the Supreme Court. While recommending former clerks for positions is common, this instance is notable given the timing and the potential for criticism regarding the Court’s independence. The call has already drawn renewed scrutiny of Alito’s conduct.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood