President Trump has been making the claim that tariffs have generated $18 trillion for the United States, a figure he has repeated multiple times in various public settings. This number is not only factually incorrect but also logically impossible, as the actual tariff revenue collected by the government this year is significantly lower, approximately $236 billion. The article suggests that Trump’s statement may be confusing tax revenue with private investment deals, but even when accounting for these, the $18 trillion figure is a vast exaggeration compared to the White House’s own reported figures. Ultimately, the article concludes that the basis for Trump’s claim is unclear, potentially fabricated.
Read More
President Trump has recently been touting an inflated figure of $18 trillion, claiming it represents the revenue generated by tariffs, a figure that has been repeated across various public appearances. This number is not only factually incorrect but also logically impossible, as the federal government has collected significantly less in tariff revenue. The president seems to be conflating tariff revenue with private investment deals, further blurring the line between the government and the private sector, but even the White House’s own tracking shows a figure far less than the claimed $18 trillion. Ultimately, the origin of this figure remains unclear.
Read More
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently claimed that China stopped buying American soybeans during the Biden administration due to a lack of respect, but this was quickly debunked by evidence showing robust purchases during that time. This statement highlights Leavitt’s willingness to distort facts in service of the president’s political agenda, a pattern evident in other recent statements. Specifically, Leavitt inaccurately asserted the economy was improving despite clear indicators of rising costs, a contracting manufacturing sector, and poor job growth. When confronted with these realities, Leavitt deflected criticism by accusing reporters of pushing “untrue narratives” instead of addressing the facts.
Read More
The White House recently launched a “Media Bias” webpage designed to expose “fake news,” but the site initially contained factual errors. The page was briefly taken down and altered after incorrectly attributing questions to a Fox News reporter. Currently, the site lists 31 “fake news offenses” from 21 publications, and the White House has come under fire for inaccurate claims against outlets such as The Daily Beast. This new initiative is part of the administration’s ongoing anti-media campaign, which includes restrictions on journalists and legal challenges against news organizations.
Read More
“Kinetic sanctions”: 160 strikes on Russian refineries cut oil output by 90% – SBU chief, that headline, it’s a real grabber, isn’t it? It certainly gets your attention, and it’s easy to see why it would be shared widely. However, when we dig into the details and the supporting information, things get a little murkier, and we need to approach the claims with a healthy dose of skepticism.
The core of the issue lies in that initial 90% figure. It’s a significant claim, suggesting a massive impact on Russia’s oil production capabilities. But when you start to look for hard evidence to back it up, you run into some problems.… Continue reading
Senator Mullin blocked a resolution from Gallego calling for the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, claiming it was political theater similar to previous investigations against former President Trump. Mullin’s actions raise questions about the need to protect Trump, as his administration failed to deliver on promises regarding the Epstein files. The argument that the investigation is invalid because former President Biden wasn’t involved is deemed weak and lazy, especially considering Trump’s own connection to the case. This obstruction is seen as a deliberate attempt to delay the process and shield Trump from scrutiny.
Read More
During a tour of the Federal Reserve headquarters renovation, former President Trump cited a significantly inflated cost of $3.1 billion, which was immediately refuted by Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who clarified the included figure encompassed an unrelated building. The visit occurred amidst Trump’s ongoing criticism of Powell and his interest rate policies, with the former president previously considering Powell’s dismissal. Despite the friction, Trump suggested he was now unlikely to fire Powell but maintained his desire for lower interest rates, while Powell reaffirmed the Fed’s independence and highlighted the renovation’s necessity.
Read More
During a tour of the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation project, President Trump criticized the project’s rising costs, but was corrected by Chairman Powell. Trump, who had previously attacked Powell, claimed the cost had increased to $3.1 billion, but Powell clarified that the president was including a previously completed building in his calculations. This exchange occurred amidst Trump’s ongoing public criticism of Powell and the Federal Reserve, particularly regarding interest rates and the renovation project’s budget. Despite his public attacks, Trump refrained from direct confrontation during the visit, joking about wanting lower interest rates.
Read More
Jasmine Crockett, without a doubt, has a talent for calling out the absurdities often spouted by certain members of the Republican Party. Her recent exchange, where she dismantled a Republican’s claim that the president’s approval rating was “soaring,” is a perfect example of her direct and effective communication style. It’s the kind of moment that resonates with those who are tired of political spin and prefer a healthy dose of truth.
The premise of the whole interaction stemmed from a Republican’s assertion that the president’s approval ratings were on the rise. This claim, however, was quickly and decisively refuted by Crockett, armed with readily available facts and figures.… Continue reading
President Trump’s repeated assertion that a Los Angeles to San Francisco flight costs only $2 has been met with widespread mockery. He used this unsubstantiated claim to criticize California’s high-speed rail project, suggesting alternative, cheaper transportation options like driving or flying. The actual cost of such a flight ranges from $100 to $250, a stark contrast to Trump’s assertion. This inaccurate claim, made multiple times, highlights a disconnect from reality and has drawn considerable criticism online.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Jasmine Crockett Fact-Checks Republican Claiming Trump’s Approval is “Soaring”
Jasmine Crockett, without a doubt, has a talent for calling out the absurdities often spouted by certain members of the Republican Party. Her recent exchange, where she dismantled a Republican’s claim that the president’s approval rating was “soaring,” is a perfect example of her direct and effective communication style. It’s the kind of moment that resonates with those who are tired of political spin and prefer a healthy dose of truth.
The premise of the whole interaction stemmed from a Republican’s assertion that the president’s approval ratings were on the rise. This claim, however, was quickly and decisively refuted by Crockett, armed with readily available facts and figures.… Continue reading