The recent shift in Trump’s tariff policies highlights the significant advantages of European unity, a point emphasized by the German chancellor-designate. This isn’t to say that the outcome was entirely a result of coordinated EU action; rather, the unified response from the EU members created a strong enough counterweight to pressure Trump into reconsidering his strategy.
The initial imposition of tariffs was met with a collective response from the EU, a marked difference from past instances where individual member states might have reacted independently, leaving them vulnerable to individual pressure. This time, however, the unified front presented a formidable obstacle to Trump’s unilateral actions.… Continue reading
Nearly 73 million Americans voted for Donald Trump despite his well-documented racism, misogyny, and endorsement of white supremacy. While a single vote’s impact on an election outcome is minimal, voting constitutes a moral communication of values and acceptable policies. Therefore, all Trump voters, regardless of their specific motivations, bear some responsibility for the potential harms stemming from his policies, as their vote implicitly endorsed those policies and the resulting harm to vulnerable groups. This responsibility stems not solely from the causal impact of the vote, but from the moral implications of participating in a collective action with potentially harmful consequences. The level of responsibility may vary depending on individual motivations, but complicity exists nonetheless.
Read More
I am truly amazed at the power of collective action when it comes to public petitions. The recent news of the “Remove Aileen Cannon” petition reaching over 300,000 signatures is a testament to the strength of public outcry against injustice. It is simply astounding to see so many individuals come together to demand accountability and fairness in our judiciary system.
The issue at hand regarding Judge Aileen Cannon and her involvement in postponing Trump’s trial is a clear example of a conflict of interest and potential corruption. As a Trump-appointed judge, it is unacceptable for her to preside over a case involving the very person who secured her nomination.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker