NATO is considering a shift toward a more aggressive response to hybrid threats, including cyberattacks and airspace violations, according to Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO’s Military Committee. The alliance is exploring options like proactive cyber defense and potentially viewing “pre-emptive strikes” as defensive actions. This shift comes as European countries face increasing hybrid incidents, leading NATO to reassess its deterrence strategies, while also acknowledging the need to carefully consider legal and jurisdictional constraints. Despite successful deterrence efforts like the Baltic Sentry mission, challenges persist, particularly in international waters where accountability can be difficult to establish.
Read More
Czech President Petr Pavel, a former NATO Military Committee chairman, has cautioned that NATO must respond decisively to Russian airspace violations, as Moscow perceives restraint as weakness. Pavel believes Russia is actively testing NATO’s air defenses to gauge both individual and collective capabilities, aiming to assess the Alliance’s resolve. He pointed to past incidents, such as Russia’s repeated violations over Turkey, highlighting how a strong response ultimately deterred further aggression. In a related incident, Belgium’s military was ordered to shoot down any unidentified drones over its military bases after a drone sighting near a nuclear power plant.
Read More
NATO allies are reportedly considering a tougher stance against Russia, discussing measures such as easing restrictions on pilots to allow them to shoot down Russian aircraft and deploying armed drones. These discussions, initiated by frontline NATO members and supported by France and Britain, come amid escalating tensions due to alleged airspace violations, drone activity, and sabotage plots. Concerns over the cost of intercepting drones and a perceived need for stronger deterrence are driving the discussions. Russia has warned that shooting down its aircraft would escalate the situation, while the EU is also preparing its own responses to the ongoing provocations.
Read More
Poland and NATO deploy 30,000 soldiers in military drills. The recent military exercises involving Poland and other NATO allies, deploying a significant force of 30,000 soldiers, have a clear focus on readiness and deterrence. We’re seeing a very tangible demonstration of commitment to collective defense, not just a show of force. This isn’t just about flexing muscles; it’s about honing skills and building trust, making sure everyone is on the same page. The scale itself speaks volumes, sending a clear message about the seriousness of the situation and the dedication to protecting the alliance’s eastern flank.
Poland and NATO deploy 30,000 soldiers in military drills, and it’s more than just boots on the ground.… Continue reading
The Commission chief embarked on a seven-country tour of front-line states to reinforce the EU’s commitment against Russian aggression. This diplomatic initiative coincides with increased efforts by the U.S. President to mediate a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Key stops include Poland, Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Bulgaria, and Romania, all strategically significant due to their proximity to Russia or Belarus. In Poland, the officials visited the Polish-Belarusian border, emphasizing the importance of defending the European border and garnering financial support for the project.
Read More
Tehran will restore its nuclear program, Iranian atomic chief vows, and frankly, did anyone really think otherwise? It’s almost as if we’re stuck in a loop, aren’t we? They’ll be quiet for a bit, quietly rebuilding, gathering strength, and then, boom, we’re right back where we started. Groundhog Day, indeed. It’s a cycle that’s become all too familiar.
The big question, as always, is who’s going to foot the bill this time around? This isn’t a particularly new problem, and this is the third time we are having to address the same issue in the same manner. The world’s current state has shown that nuclear weapons are a deterrent.… Continue reading
Russia’s long-standing pattern of testing NATO’s resolve is deeply concerning. Years of sabotage and attacks, met with insufficient deterrence, indicate a dangerous escalation of the conflict. Appeasement clearly hasn’t worked, and strengthening NATO’s borders alongside fully arming Ukraine is vital. Past incidents, such as the blatant lies surrounding the presence of “little green men” in Ukraine during 2019 talks between Putin, Merkel, and Macron, highlight Russia’s willingness to deceive and its disregard for international norms.
The recent warnings from German intelligence about potential “little green men” deployments are particularly alarming. This tactic, used effectively in Crimea and Donbas, exploits ambiguity to probe weaknesses and challenge international commitments.… Continue reading
NATO Military Committee Chair Rob Bauer asserts that while Russia’s military has expanded since the war began, its effectiveness has diminished, affording the West time to bolster defenses. He stresses the need for increased defense industry investment and adaptation to potential wartime scenarios, citing Russia’s and China’s control over vital resources like energy and rare earth minerals as vulnerabilities. Bauer emphasizes the strategic implications of Western reliance on these resources and advocates for proactive measures, including preemptive strikes on Russian territory in the event of an attack. This shift reflects NATO’s evolving strategic posture, moving away from a purely reactive defense.
Read More
Russia’s use of a MIRVed ballistic missile in Ukraine marks a dangerous escalation, representing the first-ever combat use of this technology. This departure from Cold War deterrence doctrine, where such missiles were designed to prevent nuclear war, now raises concerns about a “use them or lose them” scenario, incentivizing preemptive strikes. The high destructive capacity and vulnerability of MIRVs, even in conventional use, increases global instability. The proliferation of MIRV technology among various nations further exacerbates this risk, creating a more dangerous geopolitical environment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood