A significant majority of Americans view the leak of US attack plans for Yemen via a Signal group chat as a serious matter, with 53% deeming it “very serious,” despite the Trump administration’s attempts to downplay the incident. This surpasses public concern over previous controversies like Hillary Clinton’s email server and Trump’s retention of classified documents. The leak, involving sensitive intelligence shared with Israel, sparked bipartisan unease, even among some Republicans, despite claims the information was unclassified and the mission successful. The White House acknowledged the mistake and pledged to prevent recurrence.
Read More
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz denies knowing journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, claiming he wouldn’t recognize him, despite Goldberg’s assertion of having met Waltz twice. However, a 2021 photograph shows both men together at a book launch, contradicting Waltz’s statement. Waltz attributed Goldberg’s inclusion in a top-secret group chat to a technical issue or hacking, a claim met with skepticism. Following the leak of sensitive information, President Trump, reportedly angered by the incident, tasked Waltz with investigating the matter.
Read More
During a House Intelligence Committee hearing, Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) questioned CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s potential alcohol consumption prior to a security breach. Hegseth accidentally included a journalist in a Signal group chat containing classified war plans. Ratcliffe vehemently objected to the line of questioning, leading to a shouting match with Gomez. The exchange highlighted concerns about Hegseth’s alleged drinking and the severity of the security breach.
Read More
Duckworth’s statement, calling Pete Hegseth a “f‑‑‑ing liar,” is a stark condemnation rooted in a serious allegation of reckless leaking of classified information. The gravity of the situation, according to Duckworth, is the potential harm to American pilots, a consequence that underscores the severity of her accusation. The language she uses reflects the intensity of her anger and concern.
The assertion that Hegseth’s actions could have resulted in the deaths of pilots highlights the potential consequences of mishandling classified information. This isn’t just a political disagreement; it’s about national security, and the potential for catastrophic consequences. Duckworth’s strong words reflect the serious nature of the alleged offense.… Continue reading
The Atlantic published a Signal chat revealing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared precise timelines of a Yemen airstrike, including launch times and bomb detonation, before U.S. personnel were airborne. This disclosure prompted an investigation request from senators concerned about the use of an unapproved app for classified information, despite White House claims no classified data was shared. The chat notably excluded the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, raising questions about protocol and operational security. Hegseth maintains he only provided a “general update,” while critics argue his actions jeopardized U.S. forces.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is straightforward and confidential. This allows readers to contribute directly to the publication’s investigative journalism. Your tips may lead to impactful reporting.
Read More
A significant security breach occurred when top Trump administration officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, mistakenly included a journalist in a Signal group chat discussing classified details of a Yemen military operation. This lapse exposed sensitive operational information, including targeting data and attack timing, prompting outrage from former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and other critics. Buttigieg condemned the incident as an unacceptable security failure, highlighting the risk to American lives and the hypocrisy given past criticisms of Hillary Clinton’s email practices. The White House confirmed the breach, while President Trump claimed ignorance of the event.
Read More
National Security Advisor Michael Waltz accepted full responsibility for a Signal group chat inadvertently including journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, leading to the leak of sensitive information about planned Yemen airstrikes. Waltz, while blaming Goldberg and criticizing media coverage, admitted to creating the group and stated he was investigating the incident with technical experts. Despite Waltz’s claim of no staffer involvement, President Trump suggested otherwise, though his account was unclear. The incident sparked widespread criticism, with concerns raised about potential Espionage Act violations and accusations of careless handling of classified information.
Read More
Top Trump administration officials, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, national security adviser Mike Waltz, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, are under scrutiny for a security breach. They inadvertently shared highly classified information about Yemen military strikes via a messaging app, including The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief. This action constitutes a significant security lapse and may violate the Espionage Act. Ironically, these officials previously publicly criticized others, particularly Hillary Clinton, for mishandling classified information. The National Security Council confirmed the authenticity of the leaked messages.
Read More
A major security breach occurred when a journalist was accidentally added to a group chat discussing sensitive war plans, including a planned airstrike in Yemen. This involved high-ranking officials from the Trump administration, including the Vice President and Secretary of State. Pete Buttigieg criticized the administration’s response, highlighting the incident’s stark contrast to their claims of prioritizing competence and merit in hiring practices. Buttigieg, a former intelligence officer, emphasized the severity of the breach and its potential consequences. He argued the lack of serious repercussions would expose the administration’s claims of meritocracy as disingenuous.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood