As part of an ongoing initiative, the Pentagon has directed thousands of National Guard personnel to undergo civil unrest mission training in the coming months. This training signals a potential shift, suggesting the Trump administration may be moving toward deploying uniformed military forces in urban areas, a practice previously reserved for extreme emergencies. This decision follows a period of heightened tensions and public demonstrations across the country. The increased focus on civil unrest training indicates a growing concern within the government about potential social instability.
Read More
According to an internal Pentagon directive, all 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and US territories have been ordered to create “quick reaction forces” trained in riot control, including the use of various crowd control equipment. The directive, citing a prior executive order, mandates specific training for thousands of National Guard members nationwide, with a goal to be operational by January 1, 2026. This initiative has raised concerns that the forces could be used for political purposes, such as suppressing elections, and recalls the historical use of National Guard troops in quelling civil unrest. Military trainers will be deployed to each state to facilitate the training, and each state is required to report monthly on its progress.
Read More
A newly emerged Islamic militia calling itself “The People’s Army” in Gaza has issued a strong warning to Hamas, raising fears of potential civil unrest. In a video, the group declared its control over parts of northern Gaza, vowing to provide security and rebuild the area while also forbidding Hamas from entering their controlled territory. This development follows a crackdown by Hamas on opponents, including public executions, as the group attempts to maintain its dominance after a ceasefire. Multiple clans are seeking to depose Hamas, leading to clashes and further escalating the tensions within the already devastated enclave.
Read More
Exclusive: Military feared mistakes in LA deployment could have ‘far-reaching’ implications, records show. The whole thing sounds like it was set up to fail, doesn’t it? From what I’m gathering, there were serious concerns within the military about the deployment of troops in Los Angeles. The records indicate that officials anticipated that this operation could easily attract protests, possibly leading to escalating civil unrest. The worry wasn’t just about the immediate situation but also about the potential for long-term consequences.
The underlying fear was that a misstep, a mistake in judgment, or an accidental incident could create a dangerous chain reaction, escalating far beyond the initial scope of the deployment.… Continue reading
According to a recent report, the Trump administration is considering creating a 600-soldier National Guard force, equipped with weapons and riot gear, for rapid deployment to U.S. cities experiencing civil unrest. The troops would be stationed in Alabama and Arizona, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, and able to deploy within an hour. The plans, outlined in documents compiled by National Guard officials, could be implemented as early as fiscal year 2027. Concerns within the documents included potential political sensitivities and strains on personnel.
Read More
A federal appeals court temporarily allowed President Trump to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles to quell anti-ICE protests, rejecting, however, his claim of unreviewable authority. Trump misinterpreted the ruling as a complete victory, using it to threaten nationwide National Guard deployments whenever he deems it necessary. This decision hinges on the court’s acceptance of the administration’s claim that protests impede federal law enforcement, despite evidence to the contrary and the court’s granting of excessive deference to the president’s assertion. The ruling raises serious concerns about the president’s willingness to abuse his power and the judiciary’s ability to restrain him.
Read More
In response to several nights of violence following immigration enforcement protests, a limited curfew will be in effect in a section of downtown Los Angeles from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m., potentially for multiple days. The curfew, encompassing approximately one square mile, excludes residents and workers. Over 200 arrests have been made since Friday, following incidents of looting and vandalism targeting 23 businesses Monday night. Mayor Bass urges non-residents and non-workers to avoid the designated area.
Read More
Escalating violence, including rock throwing and Molotov cocktails, has rendered Los Angeles authorities unable to maintain public safety. The protests are deemed “out of control” by Essayli. Consequently, the federal government will deploy resources to restore order and quell the unrest. This intervention is justified by the state’s obligation to protect its citizens. Federal intervention aims to regain control and ensure public safety.
Read More
Following ICE raids in Los Angeles, protests erupted, escalating into a second day of demonstrations and clashes with law enforcement. In response, President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops, a move Governor Newsom condemned as inflammatory and a deliberate escalation of tensions. The deployment followed arrests of protesters and alleged assaults on officers during the initial demonstrations. The White House defended the raids and the National Guard deployment, while Los Angeles officials reported that many protests remained peaceful.
Read More
Following immigration raids in Los Angeles, resulting in 44 arrests, protests erupted, culminating in a major confrontation in Paramount. The Trump administration responded by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops, a move criticized by California Governor Newsom as inflammatory and unnecessary. Violent clashes between protesters and federal agents, including the use of flash-bang grenades and pepper spray, led to injuries on both sides. This deployment, though authorized under the Insurrection Act of 1807, is considered by legal experts to be an extreme and potentially escalatory response.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood