Incoming Trump administration officials are questioning White House national security staff about their political affiliations, social media activity, and donation history, prompting some to prepare for departure despite assurances of continued employment. This questioning reflects Trump’s stated aim to remove perceived disloyalists from the government, a goal intensified by his focus on dismantling the so-called “deep state.” The incoming National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, has explicitly stated plans to replace national security staff with individuals fully aligned with Trump’s agenda. This planned purge contrasts sharply with current National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s concerns about maintaining operational continuity.
Read More
Experts predict that President Trump’s administration will initially target specific civil servants for dismissal, using them as examples before potentially enacting mass layoffs. This strategy leverages the “Schedule F” executive order, reclassifying certain federal employees as at-will employees lacking typical civil service protections. While mass firings are possible, the administration might instead encourage resignations through the threat of Schedule F and relocation of government jobs, potentially leading to an exodus of experienced personnel. This approach, however, presents legal complexities, particularly regarding veterans’ appeal rights and the potential erosion of institutional knowledge. Ultimately, the Trump administration will need to balance its desire for rapid change with potential legal challenges and political ramifications.
Read More
A top union leader warns that Donald Trump’s return to office will likely result in widespread harassment, intimidation, and corruption within the US federal government. This is fueled by Trump’s and his allies’ support for mass firings of civil servants and the abolishment of agencies, potentially utilizing the controversial Schedule F executive order to remove civil service protections from thousands of employees. This action would reverse over 150 years of merit-based hiring practices established by the Pendleton Act, undermining employee protections and increasing the risk of corruption. The anticipated implementation of Schedule F, central to the rightwing Project 2025 plan, threatens to significantly weaken unions and impair the government’s ability to function effectively.
Read More
With President-elect Trump’s return, a chilling effect has settled over the federal workforce, many fearing a repeat of his first term’s attacks on civil servants. Trump has promised to reinstate Schedule F, a 2020 executive order that would allow for mass firings of nonpartisan employees, replacing them with loyalists. This could fundamentally alter the federal workforce by returning to the “spoils system” of the late 1800s, where political affiliation dictates employment. The potential impact extends beyond Washington D.C., threatening the livelihoods of federal employees across the country, and creating a chilling effect that discourages independent service. While unions are preparing legal challenges, the future of the federal workforce under a Trump presidency remains uncertain, with concerns about mass firings, relocation of agency offices, and a government efficiency commission headed by Elon Musk.
Read More
As I ponder J.D. Vance’s radical plan to overhaul the government by replacing every midlevel bureaucrat and civil servant with Trump loyalists, I can’t help but feel a sense of dread wash over me. The implications of such a move are staggering, and the potential fallout could be catastrophic for our country.
Imagine a scenario where Fred, your alcoholic neighbor down the street, is now in charge of city planning simply because he had the most Trump signs in his yard. This is the reality that Vance envisions, where political allegiance trumps competency and expertise. The very backbone of our government, the civil service, would be dismantled and replaced with individuals more aligned with a particular ideology than with serving the people.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker