The arrest of Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University associate of Mahmoud Khalil, by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents has sparked outrage and fear. Mahdawi’s arrest, occurring during his citizenship hearing, felt less like a legal process and more like a kidnapping to many observers. The swift action, lacking even the appearance of a clear criminal suspicion, has left many questioning the motivations and legality of the DHS’s actions.
The concerns extend beyond Mahdawi’s individual case. His situation highlights a pattern of questionable detentions followed by hastily filed habeas petitions, a worrying trend suggesting a deliberate strategy to circumvent legal protections.… Continue reading
U.S. citizen and Michigan-based attorney Amir Makled was detained by federal immigration agents upon returning from a family vacation, despite presenting his U.S. citizenship documentation. Agents demanded access to his phone, citing no specific reason for the detention, which lasted over 90 minutes. Makled refused, believing the request was intended to intimidate him due to his representation of a student charged in connection with a pro-Palestinian protest. He believes the incident is a chilling effect targeting attorneys who represent politically active clients.
Read More
On March 31st, ICE agents, without a warrant, forcibly removed Elsy Noemi Berrios from her car in Westminster, Maryland, while her daughter filmed the incident. The arrest stemmed from allegations of MS-13 gang association, vehemently denied by Berrios and her daughter, Karen Cruz Berrios. Berrios, who is seeking asylum and has work authorization, is currently detained in Pennsylvania awaiting a bond hearing. The incident highlights concerns about ICE enforcement tactics and the potential for mistaken identity or false accusations in deportation cases.
Read More
Trump is being sued by a Democrat he removed from a US civil rights agency. This legal battle, unfolding against a backdrop of already intense political polarization, adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing discussions about power, accountability, and the very nature of political appointments.
The lawsuit itself is a direct consequence of Trump’s actions during his presidency. He wielded considerable power in appointing and removing officials, a power inherent in the executive branch. However, the legal challenge suggests that the manner in which he exercised this power in this specific case may have violated legal norms or exceeded permissible boundaries.… Continue reading
Dearborn attorney Amir Makled was detained at Detroit Metro Airport upon returning from a family vacation and questioned about his clients, specifically his representation of a University of Michigan pro-Palestinian protester. CBP denied targeting Makled due to political beliefs, citing national security concerns as the basis for electronic device searches. Makled, however, believes the incident was politically motivated, reflecting a broader trend of the current administration targeting lawyers involved in cases challenging its policies. He refused to surrender his phone but allowed agents to review his contact list.
Read More
Widespread protests against the Trump administration’s “Project 2025” took place across the U.S. and internationally, encompassing over 1,200 locations. Organized by a broad coalition of groups, demonstrators opposed various policies including cuts to social programs and attacks on civil rights. Former Vice President Harris publicly thanked protesters for their actions, highlighting their defense of key social programs and individual liberties. The White House countered by accusing Democrats of jeopardizing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Read More
Booker says it ‘irked’ him that Thurmond held the previous record for the longest Senate speech, a record Booker recently surpassed. The sentiment reflects a deeper frustration; Booker felt the record, held by a notorious segregationist, symbolized systemic efforts to bar Black Americans from political power. It’s not just about the length of the speech, but the context in which that record was set – a time when the fight for civil rights was brutal, and the Senate itself was a battleground for racial justice.
The fact that Thurmond’s record stood for so long, a testament to obstructionism against civil rights legislation, is a powerful symbol of the enduring legacy of racial prejudice in American politics.… Continue reading
The Department of Homeland Security’s Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties has been eliminated, leaving its $22 million budget and functions uncertain. This action aligns with the Trump administration’s broader pattern of dismantling oversight and civil rights agencies. The office’s role in handling ICE complaints likely contributed to its abolishment, reflecting the administration’s prioritization of expedited deportations. This move is seen as a deliberate effort to weaken protections against civil rights violations within immigration enforcement.
Read More
Sending Americans to foreign prisons is a deeply troubling proposition, one that has sparked outrage and concern. The idea itself flies in the face of fundamental legal principles and established norms regarding the rights of citizens. Civil rights groups are vehemently opposed, and rightly so, asserting that such an action would be unequivocally illegal.
The sheer illegality of this proposed action is a point that bears repeating. It’s not a matter of opinion or political debate; it’s a blatant violation of established legal frameworks, international treaties, and basic human rights. The very notion that a government could simply exile its own citizens to foreign prisons without due process is shocking and should be alarming to everyone.… Continue reading
A recent change to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) removes the explicit prohibition of segregated facilities in federal contracts. This alteration, prompted by President Trump’s executive orders on diversity and gender identity, rescinds a clause dating back to the 1960s that mandated integrated workplaces for federal contractors. While existing state and federal laws against segregation remain in effect, legal experts deem this change symbolically significant, potentially undermining decades of progress toward racial and gender equality. The removal of the clause occurred without the typical public comment period, raising concerns about transparency and due process.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker