The Pentagon’s decision to deploy 700 Marines to Los Angeles is raising serious concerns about the blurring lines between military and civilian law enforcement. The sheer scale of the deployment, particularly in relation to the reported number of protestors, is prompting questions about the necessity and proportionality of such a response. Many are pointing out that this action seems excessive, especially considering the available resources of the National Guard.
This deployment immediately brings to mind the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the use of the military for domestic law enforcement purposes. The act, while amended in 2022 to include Marines and Navy personnel, still places significant limitations on military involvement in civilian affairs.… Continue reading
Following recent immigration raids in Los Angeles, resulting in numerous arrests and significant protests, President Trump deployed National Guard troops, characterizing the demonstrations as an “insurrection.” This action, coupled with previous raids and the arrest of individuals even after judicial dismissal, signals the creation of a police state infrastructure. This infrastructure involves declaring emergencies to justify federal agent intervention, warrantless arrests, and the potential for expanded detention facilities. The article concludes that while martial law has not yet been declared, the current trajectory is cause for serious concern.
Read More
Following ICE raids in Los Angeles resulting in 44 arrests, protests erupted, escalating into violent clashes with law enforcement over two days. The demonstrations, characterized by confrontations with Border Patrol agents deploying tear gas, prompted a federal response including the proposed deployment of the National Guard, a move opposed by California’s governor. The White House condemned the protests as an “insurrection,” while Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass supported the protesters and criticized the raids as intended to “sow terror.” The situation highlights ongoing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement in the United States.
Read More
This memorandum authorizes the deployment of up to 2,000 National Guard personnel, for a period of 60 days or as deemed necessary by the Secretary of Defense, to protect federal personnel and property from violence related to immigration enforcement. The deployment is in response to recent incidents and credible threats against ICE and other federal agencies. The Secretary of Defense may also utilize additional regular Armed Forces personnel as needed and must consult with the Attorney General and Homeland Security Secretary before withdrawing personnel. This action is taken under the President’s constitutional authority.
Read More
Following immigration enforcement operations and subsequent protests in Los Angeles, President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members to address what the White House deemed “lawlessness.” This deployment, met with criticism from California Governor Gavin Newsom who asserted local authorities were handling the situation adequately, occurred after clashes between protesters and authorities during demonstrations against ICE raids. Federal officials, including the ICE Acting Director, blamed local leadership for insufficient response to the protests, while the LAPD countered with claims of delayed response due to federal use of chemical irritants. The protests, centered around Paramount and downtown Los Angeles, resulted in arrests for alleged assaults on federal agents.
Read More
Following ICE raids in Los Angeles resulting in numerous arrests, protests erupted, marked by clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement, property damage, and the use of flash-bang grenades. President Trump responded by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops under federal command to quell the unrest, a decision condemned by California Governor Newsom as inflammatory. The deployment followed threats from White House officials to utilize additional federal forces, including the Marines, if the protests continued. These actions have been criticized as escalating tensions and silencing dissent against the administration’s immigration policies.
Read More
A White House aide recently labeled anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles as an “insurrection.” This inflammatory characterization immediately sparked a firestorm of debate and concern, raising questions about the administration’s intentions and the potential for escalating tensions. The use of such strong language to describe a protest, especially one focused on immigration enforcement, is deeply troubling and warrants careful consideration.
The immediate reaction to this declaration highlighted the stark division in how different groups perceive the events. While some might view the protests as passionate expressions of dissent against controversial immigration policies, others might interpret the aide’s words as a deliberate attempt to paint the protesters as a dangerous threat to national security.… Continue reading
A Department of Homeland Security memo details plans to deploy up to 20,000 National Guard troops for immigration enforcement, including fugitive apprehension, detention support, transportation, and translation services. The memo outlines roles ranging from “night operations and rural interdiction” to guard duty and riot control within detention facilities. While the Pentagon hasn’t approved the request, deployment could begin as early as next month, primarily from Republican-led states. This unprecedented use of the National Guard for domestic immigration enforcement raises legal questions and concerns.
Read More
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) has uploaded over 1.5 million DNA profiles, including those of children as young as four, to the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) since 2020. This represents a massive increase in genetic surveillance, with most profiles collected from migrants not accused of felonies. Experts raise concerns about the expansive nature of this practice and its potential impact on privacy and the targeting of immigrant communities. The CBP asserts that DNA collection aids in border security efforts, while critics argue that the loose definition of “detained” in the immigration context allows for widespread, unchecked collection. The collected DNA is stored indefinitely by the FBI.
Read More
Streamer Hasan Piker was detained at O’Hare International Airport upon returning from France, undergoing several hours of questioning by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers. The questioning focused on Piker’s political views, including his opinions on President Trump and various Middle Eastern groups. Piker believes the detention was an attempt to intimidate him and others who express similar political viewpoints. While CBP could not verify the incident, similar detentions have been reported, highlighting concerns about potential overreach by authorities.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker