A new bill introduced by Rep. Brian Mast raises concerns among civil liberties advocates due to its potential to grant the Secretary of State, mirroring actions taken by Secretary Rubio, the power to revoke passports based on speech deemed to support terrorism. This legislation, part of a larger State Department reorganization, allows passport denial or revocation for individuals convicted or merely charged with providing material support to terrorism, or who are determined to have aided a designated foreign terrorist organization. Critics like Seth Stern and the ACLU’s Kia Hamadanchy argue that these provisions could punish individuals for their opinions and could be used to silence dissenting voices, potentially targeting journalists, and lacks meaningful appeal processes. The bill has faced scrutiny, particularly in light of similar past attempts to penalize groups and individuals based on their views on political issues, including pro-Palestinian activism.
Read More
Trump Threatens ‘WAR’ on Chicago. The sheer audacity of a former, and potentially future, U.S. President, to use the word “WAR” when discussing a major American city like Chicago is alarming, to say the least. It’s a phrase pregnant with historical weight, signaling a state of armed conflict, not just a tough-on-crime policy. To frame a potential interaction with a city as a “war,” especially by the very individual who vowed to bring peace, feels like a profound betrayal of the American people.
Trump’s rhetoric and this specific threat immediately raise questions about his fitness for office. Is this a slip of the tongue, a poor choice of words, or a calculated move intended to further inflame tensions?… Continue reading
Former President Barack Obama criticized Donald Trump’s plans to address crime in Chicago, warning of the potential risks to American liberties. The Trump administration had discussed a mass immigration operation in Chicago, involving Homeland Security officials and potentially utilizing a naval base. Obama’s comments were made in response to an op-ed on Trump’s actions, with the former president stating that the erosion of due process and increased militarization put all Americans at risk. Trump’s actions come despite the city reporting decreases in violent crime.
Read More
Former President Barack Obama expressed concerns regarding the Trump administration’s increasing use of the military for domestic operations, citing threats to due process and civil liberties. His comments followed a Department of Homeland Security request for support from Naval Station Great Lakes in Illinois for potential immigration crackdowns, mirroring President Trump’s recent deployment of National Guard troops elsewhere. Illinois leaders have vowed to resist any military mobilization in Chicago, with Governor JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson opposing the presence of troops. This situation has led to political tensions, especially given Trump’s criticisms of Chicago’s crime rates and Pritzker’s response, with no official decisions made yet regarding the DHS request.
Read More
An East Palo Alto woman arrested by ICE on Monday, August 25, 2025, remained at Stanford Hospital the following day after suffering a medical emergency during the arrest, prompting concerns from local advocates and officials. The arrest, the first of its kind under the current federal administration, occurred when the woman was pulled from her car as she attempted to leave for work. Local advocates and an attorney attempted to ensure her health and allow family visitation, but were initially denied. Representatives and hospital staff were in communication in order to find a positive outcome.
Read More
Texas Democrats took their state trooper escorts to one unexpected spot: A Dallas gay bar, and the reaction is, well, complex, to say the least. It’s like a scene ripped straight from a movie, a mix of political statement, mischievous rebellion, and perhaps a dash of plain old discomfort, depending on your perspective. Some see it as a hilarious bit of trolling, a clever way to subvert the power dynamic. Others view it with a more critical lens, pointing out the deeper implications of the situation and the underlying power structures at play.
The idea of state troopers being “taken” anywhere, especially by Democrats, raises immediate questions.… Continue reading
In San Bernardino, California, a family experienced a harrowing encounter when masked federal agents surrounded their truck and demanded they exit the vehicle. After the family requested identification, which the agents refused, the agents began smashing the car’s windows. The father then attempted to flee, prompting the agents to open fire. Despite a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson claiming the suspect drove at officers, the family stated the agents provided no identification or warrants, leading to the father and family’s fear of their lives.
Read More
Following President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and federal agents to Washington, D.C., the city’s mayor condemned the intervention as unpatriotic and an overreach of federal power. The deployment, framed by the administration as a response to rising crime, has faced significant backlash, particularly due to its unprecedented nature and potential infringement on home rule. Despite a reported decrease in violent crime, the federal government’s actions include placing the city’s police department under federal control, though a recent deal partially reversed this. Subsequently, several Republican-led states announced they would deploy National Guard troops to the city, further increasing the federal presence.
Read More
Six months into Trump’s second term, a lawless administration is solidifying its law enforcement powers, creating a police state that increasingly strips residents of their rights and due process. Unaccountable immigration agents are arresting individuals, including U.S. citizens and those seeking refuge, and quickly deporting many without due process. Trump’s actions include improperly using the military, defying court orders, and setting arbitrary quotas for ICE agents while simultaneously appealing to white nationalists. This approach has resulted in a republic of fear and violence with little support among the American public.
Read More
President Trump has moved to further militarize Washington, D.C., deploying the National Guard under the pretense of restoring order. This move bypasses the city’s elected leaders and follows a pattern of increased federal troop deployments across the country, including a new “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force” planned by the Pentagon. The administration is also threatening to exert similar control over other cities. Critics argue that this escalating use of the military for domestic matters is unprecedented and violates the principles of Posse Comitatus, raising concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the normalization of military involvement in law enforcement.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood