The Supreme Court is poised to dismantle campaign finance restrictions, potentially eliminating limits on donations and hindering bribery prosecutions. A new book, “Master Plan,” details a decades-long conservative strategy to deregulate campaign finance, culminating in the *Citizens United* decision. Two specific cases, including one backed by J.D. Vance, could allow party committees to become conduits for large donations, and weaken anti-bribery laws. These efforts aim to make it increasingly difficult to prosecute public corruption, allowing for influence peddling.
Read More
Former Supreme Court Justice Kennedy says “democracy is at risk,” and the immediate reaction is, well, a mix of incredulity and anger. It’s hard to ignore the fact that this declaration comes from a man whose decisions and timing arguably played a significant role in the current state of affairs. The sentiment, echoed repeatedly, is one of “you built this,” followed by a demand for accountability. It’s like someone who lit a fire then warns you about the smoke.
The core of the discontent seems to revolve around a few key actions, most prominently, the Citizens United decision. This ruling, allowing unlimited corporate spending in political campaigns, is seen by many as a direct blow to the integrity of elections and the influence of ordinary citizens.… Continue reading
Rep. Crockett and former Sen. Tester highlighted the detrimental effects of large political donations, citing Elon Musk’s substantial contribution to President Trump’s campaign and subsequent benefits, including government contracts. They decried the resulting cuts to social programs like Medicaid and SNAP, arguing these actions prioritize the wealthy at the expense of everyday Americans. This connection between campaign financing and legislative outcomes, exacerbated by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, fuels public distrust in politicians. The congresswoman emphasized the need for increased voter engagement and awareness to counteract the influence of wealthy donors and misinformation campaigns.
Read More
Congresswoman Jayapal, along with over two dozen Democratic colleagues, introduced a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. This “We the People Amendment” seeks to revoke corporate constitutional rights and curtail the influence of massive political spending, exemplified by Elon Musk’s significant contributions to the Trump campaign. The amendment would mandate transparency in political contributions and expenditures at all governmental levels. Supporters argue this is a necessary systemic solution to counter the escalating power of corporations and the corrupting influence of dark money in politics.
Read More
Representative Jayapal introduced the We the People Amendment, a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn Citizens United and end corporate personhood. The amendment seeks to curtail the undue influence of money in politics by explicitly stating that constitutional rights belong to human beings, not corporations. This would reverse the Citizens United ruling, which drastically increased corporate spending in elections, and mandate the public disclosure of all political contributions and expenditures. The amendment is supported by numerous co-sponsors and aims to restore democratic balance.
Read More
President Trump’s second inauguration, coinciding with the 15th anniversary of the Citizens United ruling, highlights the profound influence of big money in politics. The presence of several tech billionaires at the inauguration underscores this, with their collective net worth exceeding $1 trillion. Analysis reveals that a mere ten megadonors contributed over 44% of the funds supporting Trump’s election, a level of concentration unprecedented in presidential campaigns. This extreme reliance on a small group of wealthy individuals is a direct consequence of Citizens United’s removal of restrictions on political spending.
Read More
In a Fox News op-ed, Senator Bernie Sanders warns of a growing divide between the wealthy and the rest of America, arguing that unchecked billionaire influence threatens to establish an oligarchy. He highlights the disproportionate wealth of Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg, whose combined holdings surpass that of the bottom half of the US population. Sanders criticizes the outsized role of billionaires in political campaigns, facilitated by rulings like *Citizens United*, and condemns the concentrated ownership of media and various economic sectors. He concludes that this system undermines democratic principles, urging a fight for an economy that benefits all Americans.
Read More
Elon Musk’s significant financial contributions to the Republican Party, coupled with his threats to fund primary challengers to both Republicans and Democrats, nearly caused a government shutdown. His actions, including public pronouncements against a bipartisan spending bill, prompted outrage and renewed calls for campaign finance reform. This incident highlights the growing concern over the undue influence of wealthy individuals on American politics. The controversy spurred debates within the Democratic Party regarding super PAC spending in primaries and the need for stricter regulations. Ultimately, a revised spending bill passed, narrowly avoiding a shutdown, but the event underscored the urgent need for addressing campaign finance reform.
Read More
When I hear the words, “‘That’s Oligarchy,’ Says Sanders as Billionaires Pump Cash Into Trump Campaign — “We must overturn the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision and move to public funding of elections,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders,” it resonates deep within me. The notion that billionaires can have such a profound impact on our democratic process is alarming. The fact that their immense wealth can sway elections, essentially buying influence and power, goes against the very foundation of democracy.
It is disheartening to see the influence of money in politics grow to such an extent that it threatens the core principles of our democracy.… Continue reading
Elon Musk donating $75 million to the Trump campaign has stirred up a lot of controversy and rightfully so. The fact that someone with that level of wealth can essentially buy their way into political influence is concerning, to say the least. It raises questions about the integrity of our political system and the extent to which money can sway the course of an election. It’s a stark reminder of the gross inequality that exists in our society, where the ultra-rich can essentially buy power and influence while the average person struggles to make their voice heard.
The Citizens United Supreme Court ruling has undoubtedly paved the way for this type of corruption to flourish.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood