The proposal known as Trump’s SAVE America Act appears to be designed with the specific intention of curtailing, if not outright ending, voter registration drives across the entire nation. This move seems to stem from a place of perceived political necessity, particularly in the lead-up to significant elections, suggesting a strategy aimed at controlling the electorate by limiting who can participate in the democratic process. The core argument is that by halting these drives, which actively seek to bring new voters into the system, the act would effectively suppress the vote, a tactic often associated with efforts to maintain power.
The sentiment behind this proposed legislation is that it’s a direct attack on voting rights.… Continue reading
This executive order seeks to establish federal lists of citizens and direct the U.S. Postal Service to transmit mail ballots only to individuals on these lists. The order directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile “state citizenship lists” from various federal records for states to verify their voter rolls. However, legal experts anticipate swift court challenges, citing the Constitution’s clear allocation of election administration powers to the states, making federal presidential overreach unlikely to stand. This action follows previous attempts by the president to influence election processes and impose stricter voter identification requirements.
Read More
A Wisconsin man has been convicted of election fraud and identity theft for illegally requesting absentee ballots for prominent local officials. Jurors found Harry Wait guilty of two misdemeanor election fraud charges and one felony identity theft charge. Wait admitted to the actions, stating he aimed to expose vulnerabilities in the state’s voter registration system, a stance that has drawn both criticism and praise. His conviction follows a similar case where another individual also claimed to be testing election system integrity.
Read More
Conservative activist Harry Wait was convicted of felonies in Wisconsin after intentionally ordering mail ballots in the names of others. Wait stated his actions were an attempt to expose the potential for voter fraud. The case highlights ongoing concerns and legal challenges surrounding election security and voter registration practices.
Read More
A federal judge has ruled against President Trump’s request to add a documentary proof of citizenship requirement to the federal voter registration form. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly determined the directive was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers, siding with Democratic and civil rights groups. The ruling prevents the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from adding the requirement, which has been attempted by Republicans but faced legal challenges. The lawsuit will continue to address other aspects of Trump’s executive order, including the requirement that all mailed ballots be received by Election Day.
Read More
The Trump administration, through the Department of Justice, has initiated lawsuits against Maine and Oregon, claiming they failed to provide necessary voter registration information and adhere to federal laws. These lawsuits, filed under the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act, and the Civil Rights Act, allege the states’ refusal to produce electronic voter registration lists and details regarding voter list maintenance procedures. Officials in both states have criticized the actions, accusing the administration of using federal power to intimidate them and undermine elections. The DOJ argues the information is crucial to ensure election integrity and prevent fraudulent voting in federal elections.
Read More
The House passed the “SAVE” Act, a restrictive voting bill requiring in-person proof of citizenship for voter registration, a measure projected to disenfranchise millions, particularly women, minorities, and rural residents. The bill’s passage was along party lines, with four Democrats joining Republicans in support. While framed as combating non-citizen voting, critics argue it disproportionately impacts eligible voters lacking readily available citizenship documentation. The bill’s future remains uncertain, facing an uphill battle in the Senate where a filibuster is anticipated.
Read More