In response to the United States’ naval presence in the Caribbean, Nicolás Maduro has declared a state of external emergency in Venezuela, granting him expanded powers in defense and national security matters. The decree, which can last up to 180 days, was prompted by the deployment of U.S. military forces near Venezuelan waters, a move the Venezuelan government views as a threat and a pretext for regime change. Washington claims the deployment is part of an effort to combat drug trafficking, and earlier this month, U.S. forces carried out strikes on speedboats allegedly transporting narcotics from Venezuela, increasing tensions. The Venezuelan government has condemned the deployment as an act of coercion and a potential prelude to intervention.
Read More
Following the U.S. military actions in the Caribbean, Latin American leaders, including those from Colombia and Cuba, condemned the United States for its unilateral attacks on boats in the region, particularly those off the coast of Venezuela. These leaders have expressed concern over the extrajudicial killings of civilians and the potential for destabilization. Cuba’s Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernández de Cossío emphasized the unjustified nature of the military presence and called for a responsible attitude from the United States. Furthermore, the article also touched upon the false claims made by former U.S. President Donald Trump about Cuba’s access to medicine and autism rates.
Read More
U.S. military officials are preparing options for strikes within Venezuela against drug traffickers, potentially starting in weeks, motivated by the alleged insufficient efforts of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to stop drug flow. These plans primarily involve drone strikes on drug trafficking groups and labs. The Trump administration has already escalated its military campaign, targeting vessels allegedly carrying drugs from Venezuela, and discussions between the U.S. and Venezuela are underway through intermediaries. The U.S. has significantly increased military presence in the region, suggesting the administration is willing to use any means necessary to combat the illegal drug trade and potentially instigate regime change.
Read More
Trump warns Venezuela to take back prisoners or face ‘incalculable’ price, and this instantly ignites a sense of unease, doesn’t it? The choice of words, “incalculable price,” is a loaded one, especially coming from a figure known for a loose relationship with facts and figures. It almost feels like a threat cloaked in a veil of ambiguity, leaving the door open for any action, no matter how extreme. It’s a phrase that suggests there are no limits to what could happen if Venezuela doesn’t comply with the demands.
The implications are far-reaching, and the situation is further complicated by the reported background details.… Continue reading
Venezuelan authorities have reported the seizure of nearly 3.7 metric tons of cocaine and the arrest of several individuals, including a purported DEA agent. The intercepted speedboat, carrying the illicit cargo, originated from Colombia’s Guajira region and was linked to a trafficking group. According to Venezuelan officials, the detainees confessed the shipment was part of a “false flag operation” aimed at falsely implicating Venezuela in international drug trafficking. The announcement comes amid ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela over drug enforcement and accusations of the country becoming a hub for cocaine shipments.
Read More
President Trump announced the U.S. military again targeted a boat from Venezuela allegedly carrying drugs, resulting in the death of three individuals, and hinted at expanding military targeting of cartels. The administration justified the actions, citing the threat to U.S. security, while also suggesting potential strikes against cartels operating on land. This follows a previous military strike with deadly results, which raised questions of legality from various senators and human rights organizations. Meanwhile, Venezuelan President Maduro accused the U.S. of using drug trafficking accusations as a pretext for actions aimed at regime change.
Read More
The U.S. military conducted a strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug vessel in international waters, resulting in the deaths of three individuals. President Trump claimed the action targeted “violent drug trafficking cartels,” and the attack was recorded with evidence of cocaine and fentanyl. The strike followed an earlier attack that killed 11, escalating tensions and drawing condemnation from Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who vowed to defend against U.S. “aggression.” Legal experts raised concerns about the legality of the initial attack under international law, and Venezuela responded by flying fighter jets over a U.S. Navy destroyer.
Read More
The U.S. military conducted another strike against a Venezuelan drug cartel vessel in international waters, resulting in the death of three individuals. President Trump stated the target was a violent drug trafficking cartel threatening U.S. interests and provided a video of the event, though details on the evidence were scarce. This strike follows a prior similar action, as the U.S. has a significant military buildup in the southern Caribbean, including aircraft and warships. The Trump administration has indicated further strikes may occur and claims self-defense as justification, while the Venezuelan government, accused of involvement, has accused the U.S. of seeking regime change.
Read More
Venezuela says the U.S. intercepted and boarded a Venezuelan tuna vessel in a “hostile” manner, and it’s got a lot of folks talking. It seems a U.S. destroyer, according to Venezuela’s Foreign Minister, intercepted, boarded, and essentially occupied a Venezuelan fishing vessel within Venezuela’s Special Economic Zone. Now, the Venezuelans are calling the whole thing illegal and hostile, adding that the crew consisted of “humble” fishermen and that the vessel posed no threat.
The immediate reaction here is a mix of skepticism and concern. A lot of the discussion immediately goes to the question of legality. Did the U.S. have any right to be doing this in Venezuelan waters?… Continue reading
Venezuela’s interior minister refuted claims that the 11 individuals killed in the US military strike were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, asserting investigations revealed they were not drug traffickers. US officials confirmed the vessel was fired upon after changing course and heading back to shore. This has led to concerns among US lawmakers, with some questioning the legality of the action and the administration’s justification, particularly regarding the use of military force for law enforcement. The White House maintains the individuals were “narco-terrorists” and that the President acted within the laws of armed conflict, while Venezuela has responded with increased military readiness and has increased military defenses.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood