The United States has stationed the USS Gerald Ford and approximately 15,000 troops near Venezuela, claiming the deployment is intended to combat drug trafficking, with President Trump stating action “by land” will begin soon. This follows at least 21 strikes on boats allegedly carrying drugs, though the US has not provided evidence. The Venezuelan government views this as an attempt to remove President Maduro, whose re-election was disputed, and has rejected the US’s recent designation of the “Cartel de los Soles” as a foreign terrorist organization. This designation grants US agencies expanded authority, which Venezuela strongly disputes, with officials dismissing the cartel’s existence.
Read More
In Announcing Pardon of Drug Trafficker While Threatening Venezuela, Trump Displays Contradictions: The audacity of it all, right? Framing this as mere “contradictions” feels like a gross understatement, a polite tap on the wrist for behavior that deserves far more condemnation. It’s not just a few inconsistencies; it’s a fundamental disregard for principles, ethics, and frankly, common decency.
It’s truly difficult to not feel a sense of disgust. To see someone in a position of power make such a mockery of justice, pardoning a drug trafficker while simultaneously threatening a foreign nation under the guise of fighting drugs, is frankly appalling.… Continue reading
In response to the US government’s increased pressure, including Donald Trump’s declaration that Venezuelan airspace is closed, the Venezuelan government issued a statement condemning the move as a “colonialist threat” and a violation of international law. The government demanded respect for its sovereignty and suspended all migrant deportation flights in response to Trump’s announcement. Trump’s actions follow a series of escalations, including US strikes against alleged drug boats, a military buildup in the region, and authorized covert CIA operations, as well as accusations against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of involvement in drug trafficking, which he denies. The US Federal Aviation Administration also warned major airlines of a hazardous situation, leading Venezuela to revoke operating rights for several international airlines that had suspended flights.
Read More
Venezuela has strongly condemned Donald Trump’s warning to consider its airspace closed, labeling it a “colonialist threat.” The Venezuelan foreign ministry decried the comments as an illegal aggression against its people. While the US lacks the authority to unilaterally close another country’s airspace, Trump’s statement could disrupt travel and deter airlines. This follows a warning from the US Federal Aviation Administration and Venezuela’s subsequent ban on several international airlines for failing to resume flights.
Read More
Representative Maria Salazar told Fox Business that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro understands that the U.S. is preparing for intervention, citing economic and security reasons for potential involvement. Salazar emphasized the economic benefits for the U.S., particularly for American oil companies, given Venezuela’s vast oil reserves. The congresswoman also referenced the White House’s designation of Maduro’s regime as a foreign terrorist organization, potentially paving the way for further action. She drew parallels to the 1989 Panama invasion and suggested a similar outcome.
Read More
Trump: Airspace above Venezuela ‘closed in its entirety’ as tensions grow over drug strikes is a situation that has a lot of people talking, and for good reason. It’s a complex issue with multiple layers, and it’s hard not to see the inconsistencies and potential dangers. Let’s break it down and see if we can make some sense of it all.
The core of the matter seems to be this: Trump’s administration is claiming to be cracking down on drug trafficking by taking military action, which they’re calling “drug strikes,” against Venezuela. Simultaneously, and this is where the eyebrows start to raise, the former President is considering pardoning Juan Orlando Hernández, the former Honduran President, who was convicted of moving massive amounts of cocaine into the United States.… Continue reading
Trump says airspace above and surrounding Venezuela to be closed in its entirety, and the immediate reaction is a mix of disbelief, anger, and concern. Many are questioning the legality and the motives behind such a drastic move, especially given the historical context of the “America First” rhetoric. There’s a palpable sense of betrayal, with accusations that the former president is abandoning his promises and potentially dragging the country into another protracted and costly conflict. The question on everyone’s mind seems to be: why now, and why Venezuela?
The action is seen as a potential “act of war,” or a prelude to one, under US law, drawing attention to the potential implications of armed conflict.… Continue reading
President Trump announced plans to initiate land strikes in Venezuela “very soon,” expanding the ongoing military operations that currently include attacks on boats suspected of drug trafficking in international waters. This expansion of military action comes after weeks of attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific, and amid a U.S. military buildup near Venezuela, including the deployment of significant naval and troop presence. While escalating military pressure, Trump also signaled openness to potential diplomatic engagement with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This decision follows the designation of the Cartel de los Soles as a foreign terrorist organization.
Read More
President Trump indicated that the United States is preparing to initiate actions against Venezuelan drug trafficking networks, specifically mentioning the start of land-based strikes “very soon.” This announcement follows the designation of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his allies as members of a foreign terrorist organization, allowing for the imposition of additional sanctions. The US military has already deployed significant resources, including warships and troops, in the region as part of an anti-drug-trafficking campaign, having previously conducted boat strikes. Despite these preparations, the administration previously informed lawmakers that it was not planning strikes inside Venezuela, citing the lack of legal justification for such actions.
Read More
As the U.S. builds up its largest military presence in Latin America in decades, recent polling indicates significant public opposition to military action in Venezuela. The CBS/YouGov poll revealed that 70% of Americans oppose U.S. military strikes in Venezuela, with 76% believing the administration has not clearly explained its position. Despite these concerns, the administration has been escalating its campaign, with the possibility of implementing strikes, potentially aiming for regime change. Furthermore, the poll found that three-quarters of Americans believe that congressional approval is needed for such actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood