French President Emmanuel Macron has clarified his stance on the US military operation that removed Nicolas Maduro from power in Venezuela, stating that France “neither supported nor approved” the US’s methods. This statement came after his initial reaction, which was more supportive of Maduro’s overthrow, drew criticism. The French President emphasized the importance of international law and the role of Venezuela’s 2024 election winner, Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia, in any transition. This contrasts with the US, which, while not seeking regime change, now considers itself “in charge” and seeks a compliant government.
Read More
Following the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, President Trump predicted Cuba’s imminent downfall, stating it could no longer rely on Venezuela for support. Trump indicated that the U.S. might not need to take action as Cuba was poised to collapse, and confirmed Cuban casualties during the operation. He also targeted Colombia, accusing its leadership of drug trafficking and threatening action. Trump further emphasized the importance of Greenland for U.S. security amidst growing Russian and Chinese presence in the Arctic.
Read More
The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting following the US’s actions in Venezuela, which were widely condemned as a “crime of aggression.” Multiple countries, including Brazil, China, and Russia, denounced the US’s military strikes and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, viewing it as a violation of Venezuela’s sovereignty and a dangerous precedent. While the US defended its actions as a law enforcement operation, experts questioned the legality, citing a lack of UN authorization and Venezuelan consent. Despite the widespread condemnation, the Security Council remained divided, and a collective response was unlikely due to the US’s veto power.
Read More
Witnesses reported gunfire near Venezuela’s presidential palace in Caracas, with videos surfacing online showing weapons being fired. The Ministry of Communication later stated that police fired warning shots at unauthorized drones flying over the area, clarifying there was no confrontation. This incident occurred amidst political unrest following a U.S. operation to capture President Nicolás Maduro. Following Maduro’s capture, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez was appointed president, and she has expressed interest in dialogue while condemning the operation.
Read More
The Swiss government has imposed an immediate freeze on assets held in Switzerland by Nicolas Maduro and 37 individuals connected to the Venezuelan president. This action aims to prevent the potential transfer of illegally acquired assets and will remain in effect for four years. The Swiss Foreign Ministry confirmed the freeze, emphasizing the possibility of future legal proceedings related to the Maduro administration’s potential loss of power. This marks the first time Switzerland has directly sanctioned Maduro and his associates, supplementing existing measures against Venezuela from 2018.
Read More
UN Says US Raid on Venezuela Violated International Law – The pronouncements of the United Nations, particularly when they declare a violation of international law, often carry a weight that’s quickly assessed in terms of real-world impact. In this instance, the UN has stated that a US raid on Venezuela violated international law. It’s a statement that, while significant on paper, immediately prompts the question: what comes next? The harsh reality is that international law’s effectiveness hinges on enforcement. If a powerful nation, like the US, doesn’t recognize or adhere to the ruling, the UN’s influence is significantly curtailed. It’s a bit like a judge handing down a sentence without the authority to make sure it’s carried out.… Continue reading
Following the removal of Venezuela’s leader, the Trump administration is considering who will oversee the country’s affairs. Despite Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s expertise, the White House may assign Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller a significant role, potentially overseeing post-Maduro operations. This decision raises questions about the qualifications and strategy for managing a nation of 30 million people. Trump’s statements, including his insistence on U.S. control, contradict Rubio’s efforts to downplay American involvement, leaving the future of Venezuela uncertain.
Read More
President Trump revealed he informed American oil company heads about the US military’s attack on Venezuela before it occurred, a move experts have deemed illegal. This admission, made without consulting Congress, has sparked condemnation. Critics argue that the administration prioritized oil companies over lawmakers, potentially to benefit donors. While Trump claimed the oil companies are eager to invest, experts express doubts about their willingness to commit significant funds given the country’s instability and infrastructure needs.
Read More
President Trump’s military actions in Venezuela, including the bombing of Caracas and the abduction of President Maduro, have sparked widespread criticism and calls for his impeachment. Experts in international law, such as Yale Law School professor Oona Hathaway, have argued that these actions lack a legal basis and contradict the UN charter, particularly regarding self-defense justifications. Furthermore, the seizure of Venezuela’s oil could violate the Fourth Geneva Convention. Critics across various sectors denounce the actions as morally wrong, illegal, and warranting immediate congressional intervention to stop the escalation and hold the administration accountable.
Read More
Venezuela orders police to find, arrest anyone involved in supporting the U.S. attack-decree. This is the predictable outcome following a rather chaotic and ill-conceived operation. The Venezuelan government, still firmly in power, has reacted with a swift and decisive response, ordering law enforcement to hunt down and detain anyone suspected of involvement or support for the recent events. This action, while unsurprising, throws a harsh light on the delicate situation in the country and reveals the potential consequences of the recent actions.
The initial assumption might have been that the opposition would welcome outside intervention with open arms, leading to a swift and clean regime change.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood