The U.S. military conducted another strike against a Venezuelan drug cartel vessel in international waters, resulting in the death of three individuals. President Trump stated the target was a violent drug trafficking cartel threatening U.S. interests and provided a video of the event, though details on the evidence were scarce. This strike follows a prior similar action, as the U.S. has a significant military buildup in the southern Caribbean, including aircraft and warships. The Trump administration has indicated further strikes may occur and claims self-defense as justification, while the Venezuelan government, accused of involvement, has accused the U.S. of seeking regime change.
Read More
Venezuela says the U.S. intercepted and boarded a Venezuelan tuna vessel in a “hostile” manner, and it’s got a lot of folks talking. It seems a U.S. destroyer, according to Venezuela’s Foreign Minister, intercepted, boarded, and essentially occupied a Venezuelan fishing vessel within Venezuela’s Special Economic Zone. Now, the Venezuelans are calling the whole thing illegal and hostile, adding that the crew consisted of “humble” fishermen and that the vessel posed no threat.
The immediate reaction here is a mix of skepticism and concern. A lot of the discussion immediately goes to the question of legality. Did the U.S. have any right to be doing this in Venezuelan waters?… Continue reading
Venezuela’s interior minister refuted claims that the 11 individuals killed in the US military strike were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, asserting investigations revealed they were not drug traffickers. US officials confirmed the vessel was fired upon after changing course and heading back to shore. This has led to concerns among US lawmakers, with some questioning the legality of the action and the administration’s justification, particularly regarding the use of military force for law enforcement. The White House maintains the individuals were “narco-terrorists” and that the President acted within the laws of armed conflict, while Venezuela has responded with increased military readiness and has increased military defenses.
Read More
Following a U.S. military strike in the Caribbean, Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello condemned the action, refuting President Trump’s claim that those killed were “narcoterrorists.” Questions about the legality of the strike have emerged, particularly after reports that the vessel was turning back before it was attacked. The incident highlights the potential for escalating tensions, given increased U.S. military deployments near Venezuela as part of anti-drug operations, which Caracas views as a threat to its sovereignty. The U.S. has defended its actions, while lawmakers and analysts have raised concerns about the lack of justification and the potential for further destabilization in the region.
Read More
The U.S. military destroyed a suspected drug-trafficking boat last week, with sources claiming it appeared to be turning around before the attack. The Trump administration asserts the vessel, originating from Venezuela, was operated by the Tren de Aragua gang, a designated terrorist organization. However, Venezuelan officials deny gang involvement and dispute the U.S. claims. The White House maintains the President acted within his constitutional authority and will continue to take action against drug traffickers.
Read More
People killed in US boat strike were not Tren de Aragua, Venezuela minister says. That statement immediately raises a red flag, doesn’t it? The inherent distrust in both governments makes it incredibly difficult to discern the truth. It’s a case of two entities, neither particularly known for their transparency, presenting conflicting narratives about a deadly event. This situation forces us to sift through the information, questioning motivations, and considering the potential biases involved.
The fact that the Venezuelan government is denying that the victims were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, is what we should expect. Regardless of who was on the boat, Venezuela would likely deny it.… Continue reading
According to two American officials, the U.S. military destroyed a boat off the coast of Venezuela with an initial strike, followed by a follow-up attack that killed those on board. The boat was under surveillance and appeared to turn toward shore before being struck, possibly by drones operated by Special Operations Command (SOCOM). The Trump administration has offered no evidence to support the assertion that the targeted individuals were “narcoterrorists,” and some officials, including Senator Rand Paul, have expressed concerns about the legality of the strike, given the lack of due process. A former State Department lawyer stated the U.S. is asserting the power to engage in the premeditated killing of people outside of armed conflict.
Read More
President Trump has denied seeking regime change in Venezuela, despite a significant military build-up near its coast and increasingly harsh rhetoric directed towards President Maduro. The administration claims the build-up is aimed at stopping drug cartels, and military action has already been taken against alleged cartel targets. However, officials have also accused Maduro of being in league with the cartels, heightening concerns that he may be a target. This follows prior actions, including financial sanctions and designating a Venezuelan gang as a foreign terrorist organization. With significant military assets now deployed, the situation remains tense as experts question the legality of the actions.
Read More
President Trump’s decision to order a U.S. military strike that resulted in the death of 11 individuals on a Venezuelan boat in the Caribbean has ignited a dispute between Vice President JD Vance and Senator Rand Paul. The Navy claimed the boat was carrying members of the Tren de Aragua crime gang and was involved in drug smuggling, a claim that Trump used to justify the strike as a means of preventing drugs from entering the U.S. While Vance defended the action, Paul criticized the strike, questioning the justification of killing individuals without due process or trial, calling the stance “despicable.” The Pentagon has not yet released information publicly justifying the destruction of the boat.
Read More
The Trump administration is considering military strikes against drug cartels in Venezuela, including potential targets within the country, as part of a broader strategy to weaken Nicolas Maduro. This comes after a deadly strike on a Venezuelan drug boat, which the administration has framed as the beginning of a larger effort to dismantle drug trafficking and potentially remove Maduro from power. The US has increased its military presence in the Caribbean, deploying warships, aircraft, and personnel near Venezuela, while also labeling Maduro a “narco-terrorist” and increasing the bounty for his arrest. Questions remain about the legal basis for these actions and the ultimate goals of the administration’s approach to Venezuela.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood