China has responded to the US’s increased tariffs by declaring its readiness to “fight to the end” in the ongoing trade war. The announcement came after President Trump’s statement regarding an additional 100 percent tariff on Chinese goods. This escalation in tensions demonstrates a firm stance from China, despite the potential economic consequences of a protracted trade dispute. The country’s response suggests a willingness to defend its economic interests, signaling a challenging period for international trade relations.
Read More
In response to the U.S.’s imposition of fees on Chinese vessels, China will begin charging U.S. ships docking at its ports starting October 14th. The Ministry of Transport stated these fees are a direct countermeasure, mirroring the U.S. policy. China will charge $56 per net ton, matching the U.S. rate, with plans to increase fees over time. While this will likely impact costs for U.S. consumers and potentially decrease export demand, it is unlikely to benefit U.S. shipbuilding due to China’s dominant market share.
Read More
China’s control over approximately 90% of the U.S.’s rare earth mineral supply, crucial for automotive manufacturing, has created significant challenges. Recent export restrictions imposed by China led to production slowdowns, including temporary plant closures at Ford. Following trade negotiations, China agreed to resume regular rare earth exports to the U.S., although the approval process remains cumbersome and unreliable. The situation highlights the vulnerability of the U.S. economy to disruptions in global supply chains.
Read More
China’s Foreign Ministry released a video sharply criticizing President Trump’s trade policies, depicting the US as a “bully” and urging international resistance. The video highlights historical instances of alleged US economic aggression, contrasting this with China’s portrayal as a reliable trade partner. It calls on nations to stand firm against US hegemony, refusing to concede to what it describes as unsustainable US tariffs. Despite ongoing US trade talks with other countries, China asserts it will not back down, framing the conflict as a fight for global justice. The video concludes by characterizing the US as a relatively insignificant player in global trade, ultimately a “paper tiger.”
Read More
Hong Kong’s postal service will cease handling US-bound and US-origin packages, a direct response to the US eliminating the $800 de minimis exemption for goods shipped from Hong Kong. This action, effective immediately for sea freight and April 27th for air freight, forces Hong Kong residents and businesses to utilize private couriers like FedEx and DHL, significantly increasing shipping costs. The Hong Kong government cited President Trump’s decision as unreasonable and abusive, highlighting the escalating trade tensions between the US and China. The move impacts packages only; documents remain unaffected.
Read More
Effective from 12:01 on April 10, 2025, China will impose an additional 50% tariff on imported goods originating from the United States. This escalation marks a significant turning point in the ongoing trade tensions between the two global economic giants. The move comes in direct response to the US government’s recent increase in tariffs on Chinese goods, raising the stakes considerably in this high-stakes game of economic brinkmanship.
The announced 50% tariff increase isn’t arbitrary; it’s a calculated response to the US’s own tariff hike, escalating a tit-for-tat exchange that’s rapidly spiraling out of control. This reciprocal action showcases China’s refusal to back down, highlighting the hardening of positions on both sides.… Continue reading
In response to increased US tariffs on Chinese goods, China implemented export controls on several strategic metals, including tungsten, a key component in military and civilian applications. While China controls a significant portion of the global tungsten supply, the impact of these restrictions is debated, with some viewing them as a strategic warning to encourage negotiation rather than a major economic blow. The US, however, has already been working to diversify its supply chains for these materials. Alternative sources exist for many of the restricted metals, mitigating China’s potential leverage.
Read More
China is initiating legal action against the U.S. at the WTO, alleging that President Trump’s 10% tariff on all Chinese imports violates WTO trade rules. This action follows Trump’s justification of the tariffs under the IEEPA, citing a national emergency due to illegal immigration and drug trafficking, primarily fentanyl originating from China. While China acknowledges its role in providing precursor chemicals, it rejects responsibility for the U.S. fentanyl crisis and urges a more collaborative approach to address the issue. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce vows to implement countermeasures to protect its interests.
Read More
In response to President-elect Trump’s impending tariffs on Canadian imports, Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to cut off energy supplies to the U.S., impacting states such as Michigan, New York, and Wisconsin. This drastic measure is considered a retaliatory option alongside other planned counter-tariffs on American goods, a strategy coordinated between Ottawa and all Canadian provinces. The federal government presented a border security plan aimed at addressing Trump’s concerns, a plan Premier Ford deemed a “good start” but emphasized the need for swift implementation. Despite a recent meeting between Prime Minister Trudeau and President Trump, tensions remain high, fueled by Trump’s continued jabs at Canada and Trudeau’s previous comments about the U.S. election.
Read More
Russia recently imposed a 55.65 percent tariff on Chinese furniture parts imported through Vladivostok, impacting approximately 90 percent of such imports. This reclassification, causing a significant price increase for Russian furniture, has prompted concerns about bankruptcies among importers and angered Russian furniture producers reliant on these Chinese parts. The move is particularly perplexing given the strong Russia-China trade relationship and the fact that similar European imports face significantly lower tariffs. The tariff increase has sparked criticism in China, highlighting the unexpected economic friction despite increased bilateral trade.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood