In a significant escalation of the U.S.-China trade war, President Trump announced a 100% tariff on imports from China, effective next month, adding to existing import taxes. These tariffs and export controls on “critical software” were prompted by new Chinese export controls on rare earth metals, which are crucial for numerous industries. The announcement also followed China’s imposition of port fees on U.S.-owned ships in retaliation for U.S. actions, impacting stock markets. The tariffs are expected to further complicate ongoing trade talks between the two nations, especially with a planned meeting between the presidents, while also impacting other economic relationships, such as the TikTok deal.
Read More
In response to China’s new export controls on rare earth minerals, President Trump threatened significant retaliatory measures. He announced the potential for “a massive increase of Tariffs” on Chinese imports, as well as other countermeasures under consideration. Trump’s post also included a threat to cancel his upcoming meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. These announcements followed China’s implementation of new regulations requiring licenses for the export of products containing rare earths, a move that caused stock markets to decline.
Read More
On September 13th, former U.S. President Donald Trump stated he would impose “major” sanctions on Russia if all NATO members ceased buying Russian oil. He also proposed that NATO members place tariffs ranging from 50-100% on China to further pressure Russia, emphasizing the importance of China’s influence. While Trump has previously threatened sanctions, he has been slow to enact them, although he did implement a tariff on India. Despite condemnation from Brussels, some European nations continue to rely on Russian oil imports, highlighting the complexities of reducing dependence on Russian energy sources.
Read More
In a recent development, President Trump has postponed the reinstatement of U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods for an additional 90 days, as confirmed by a White House official. The initial deadline for these tariffs was set to expire on Tuesday, but an executive order has extended it until mid-November. This delay aligns with the outcomes of the latest trade negotiations between the U.S. and China in Stockholm during late July. Had the deadline not been pushed back, U.S. duties on Chinese imports would have reverted to the high levels seen in April, when the tariff war between the two nations reached its peak.
Read More
China will eliminate tariffs on all imports from 53 African nations, excluding eSwatini, expanding upon a previous policy granting zero-tariff treatment to 33 least-developed African countries. This initiative, announced at a Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) meeting, provides duty-free access to the vast Chinese market for a significantly larger number of African nations, primarily from the middle-income bracket. The move comes amid accusations by China and African representatives that the United States is destabilizing global trade. The expansion aims to further facilitate African exports to China, bolstering economic ties between the two regions.
Read More
China has levied a 75% anti-dumping tax on US imports of polyformaldehyde copolymers, a crucial engineering plastic, while also imposing lower tariffs on imports from the EU, Taiwan, and Japan. This action, following a recent tariff truce, highlights persistent trade friction between the US and China. The Ministry of Commerce cited dumping and resultant harm to domestic industry as justification. The widely used plastic is a lightweight alternative to metals in various applications.
Read More
The Trump administration and China reached a temporary agreement to reduce tariffs, scaling back levies imposed during a trade war. The U.S. will lower its tariff rate on Chinese goods from 145 percent to 30 percent, while China will reduce its rates from 125 percent to 10 percent, also suspending some retaliatory measures. This follows a period of escalating tensions and economic uncertainty, with the U.S. facing potential recession and rising inflation. Despite claims of economic success by the Trump administration, the agreement suggests a partial retreat in the face of negative economic consequences.
Read More
Reduced cargo shipments from China are causing job losses at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, impacting part-time workers initially but threatening full-time positions. This slowdown, attributed to tariffs, threatens 136,000 direct and 1.4 million indirect jobs in the region, with ripple effects impacting businesses and potentially leading to nationwide supply chain issues. While President Trump views the slowdown as a temporary measure to improve trade relations with China, local officials warn of severe consequences, including empty store shelves. The situation is expected to worsen before improving.
Read More
In response to Mattel’s price increase due to President Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods, Trump threatened to impose a 100% tariff on Mattel toys, effectively barring them from their largest market. Mattel CEO Ynon Kreiz stated that the company does not plan to manufacture in the U.S., aiming for efficient, cost-effective production elsewhere while maintaining American design and creativity. Despite acknowledging the increased cost of toys resulting from his tariffs, Trump rationalized this as a trade-off, and Vice President Vance further defended the tariffs, linking them to increased domestic weapons production and national security. Mattel plans to reduce its reliance on Chinese imports to 15 percent by 2026.
Read More
Kent International, a four-generation family business, has seen its growth significantly hampered by recent tariffs imposed on imported goods from China. The company, a major Walmart supplier, imports approximately 90% of its bicycles from China and now faces import duties exceeding 180%, resulting in substantial financial losses. This has forced Kent to cancel orders and explore alternatives, but finding comparable pricing outside of China proves incredibly difficult. The high cost of domestic manufacturing makes complete U.S. production economically infeasible.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker