Initially criticized by President Trump, the CHIPS Act, designed to boost domestic chip production with a $52 billion fund, faced scrutiny for its early grant distribution to existing projects. Despite Intel’s struggles in fulfilling its commitments, Trump’s administration decided to partially nationalize the company using remaining CHIPS funds, purchasing a stake and effectively bailing out the struggling chipmaker. This deal, while boosting Intel’s stock price, shifted financial risks onto taxpayers by removing the company’s obligations and accountability, ultimately proving that America was investing in companies, rather than the other way around.
Read More
The U.S. government has acquired a 10% stake in Intel, a deal announced late Friday, fueled by existing funding from the CHIPS and Science Act and the Secure Enclave program, totaling $8.9 billion in grants. This investment, valued at approximately $11 billion, aims to bolster Intel’s efforts to regain its position in the chipmaking industry and move production stateside. The deal also grants the government the option to purchase an additional 5% stake and represents a significant win for both the government and Intel. This move is intended to support domestic chip production, reinforcing national security and potentially yielding financial returns.
Read More
In a significant setback for Michigan, Sandisk Corporation has abandoned its plans for a $63 billion semiconductor manufacturing complex near Flint. The project’s cancellation, which would have created thousands of jobs, was attributed to “national economic turmoil,” according to Governor Gretchen Whitmer. The state had already invested approximately $260 million in taxpayer funds to prepare a 1,300-acre megasite for the factory. This decision follows years of preparation and marks a blow to the state’s efforts to secure a major investment in advanced manufacturing, particularly in the semiconductor industry.
Read More
Despite President Trump’s aim to revitalize US chip manufacturing through tariffs and incentivized domestic production, the US faces significant hurdles in competing with Asia’s established, highly integrated ecosystem. While companies like TSMC have invested in US facilities, these plants are currently behind Taiwan’s cutting-edge technology in terms of scale and sophistication. Furthermore, challenges such as skilled labor shortages and high construction costs hinder US production capabilities. Ultimately, Trump’s protectionist approach contrasts sharply with the collaborative global model that fueled Asia’s chip industry dominance.
Read More
A surprise $158 billion investment by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) in the US, announced at a White House ceremony, has sparked controversy in Taiwan. Concerns arose regarding potential political pressure forcing the relocation of its crucial semiconductor industry, described as a “silicon shield” against China. While Taiwan’s president reassured the public, critics accused the ruling party of compromising national security for perceived US protection. This investment, however, is viewed by some as a strategic move to meet US customer demand and mitigate supply chain risks.
Read More
Taiwan’s assertion that its chip business with the U.S. is a “win-win” situation stands in stark contrast to the potential ramifications of a Trump-era tariff threat. The very notion of tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors seems counterintuitive, especially considering the potential benefits accruing to China as a result of disrupting this vital partnership. It appears that such a move could inadvertently harm both the U.S. and Taiwan while strengthening China’s position in the global semiconductor market.
This apparent contradiction highlights a larger issue: the potential for a reckless disregard for established beneficial relationships. A key point here is that the established cooperation between Taiwan and the U.S.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood