The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has sparked heated debate, with accusations flying between various actors. Donald Trump’s nominee for US national intelligence chief was accused by Ukraine of being beholden to the Kremlin. Former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, now a Trump supporter, echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the US and NATO provoked Russia into the war by failing to address its security concerns regarding Ukraine’s potential NATO membership. Gabbard asserted that this conflict could have been avoided if the US and NATO had acknowledged Russia’s legitimate fears, emphasizing the proximity of potential US/NATO forces to Russia’s borders. While NATO has affirmed Ukraine’s future membership, it has not provided a concrete timeline for its accession.
Read More
The war in Ukraine is having a devastating impact on the Russian economy, with food prices skyrocketing and causing growing concern for the Kremlin. The war has drawn workers from every industry to serve in the military, leaving farming particularly vulnerable. This shortage of workers, combined with sanctions and the disruption of supply chains, has driven prices up significantly. A kilogram of potatoes is now 73% more expensive than at the start of the year, while butter prices have jumped by over 30%.
This economic crisis presents a major challenge for President Vladimir Putin, who is trying to balance his military ambitions with the need for domestic stability.… Continue reading
Russia has reduced compensation payments for troops injured in the Ukraine war, with the new decree restricting payouts for less severe injuries. This move comes amidst growing costs for the war effort, which include both personnel losses and financial burdens. The new system offers a sliding scale of payments based on the severity of the injury, with the highest compensation reserved for “Section I” injuries that pose significant threat to life or health. This adjustment suggests that the Kremlin is facing mounting financial pressure, potentially driven by the heavy casualties suffered by Russian forces in the ongoing conflict.
Read More
In the wake of Trump’s electoral victory, Russian President Putin has engaged in psychological warfare, attempting to influence the incoming president. Putin’s delayed congratulatory message and subsequent denial of a phone conversation with Trump raise questions about the true nature of their relationship. Furthermore, a statement from Russia’s intelligence chief, Nikolai Patrushev, suggests Russia’s involvement in swaying the election, hinting at a potential blackmail scheme. This incident, coupled with Trump’s history of aligning with Putin’s interests, raises concerns about the potential for Russia’s influence on American foreign policy. Whether Trump will recognize Putin’s manipulation remains to be seen, but his past actions suggest a susceptibility to Putin’s tactics.
Read More
On November 14th, Ukrainian forces expertly executed a tactical maneuver in the Kursk region, successfully encircling a Russian assault group. The Russian relief efforts on the Ukrainian flanks also failed, resulting in significant Russian casualties. This victory came after the Ukrainians strategically withdrew from settlements, allowing the Russian convoy to pass before being destroyed by mines and drones. The Ukrainians then swiftly encircled the remaining Russian forces, effectively cutting them off from reinforcements and supplies. Despite facing heavy pressure on the western flank, the Ukrainians repelled five Russian assaults, inflicting major losses on the enemy. This successful defense showcases the Ukrainian military’s expertise in adapting to battlefield situations and maintaining control throughout the conflict.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence is deeply concerning, as her views on China, Russia, and Syria align with those of our adversaries. Gabbard’s record shows a willingness to blame the United States for the actions of hostile powers and disregard their threats to our national security. This nomination, if approved, would place a person with ideological sympathy for our adversaries in control of America’s intelligence community, jeopardizing our national security. The Senate must prioritize the nation’s safety and reject this nomination.
Read More
The potential collapse of Ukraine would be a far greater humiliation for the United States than its withdrawal from Afghanistan, argues former UK Foreign Secretary William Hague. He cautions that President-elect Trump’s perceived desire for a quick, Russia-favoring resolution to the conflict could embolden Russia and lead to further aggression in the future. Hague emphasizes the importance of maintaining Western strength and resolve against Russia, drawing parallels to the West’s failure to adequately punish Russia after its annexation of Crimea in 2014. He urges a continuation of firm support for Ukraine to prevent a disastrous outcome.
Read More
A senior Russian naval officer, Valery Trankovsky, was killed in a car bombing in Sevastopol, Crimea. Ukrainian security services claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that Trankovsky was a war criminal responsible for missile strikes on civilian targets in Ukraine. This incident is the latest in a series of targeted attacks on Russian military personnel and pro-Kremlin figures in occupied Ukrainian territories and Russia. Ukraine has been targeting individuals accused of war crimes, and while the methods and identities of the clandestine resistance groups remain largely unknown, the attacks highlight the ongoing struggle and resistance against Russian occupation.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s nomination of former Representative Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence is deeply concerning. Gabbard, with no intelligence experience, has shown alarming pro-Assad and pro-Putin sentiments, even blaming NATO and the U.S. for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Her views align with Russian propaganda and have even raised concerns from conservative commentators. This appointment poses a serious threat to national security, as Gabbard’s positions on foreign policy could compromise sensitive intelligence and undermine American interests. The Senate should exercise its constitutional duty to scrutinize this nomination and reject Gabbard’s appointment.
Read More
The news of Donald Trump choosing Tulsi Gabbard as his Director of National Intelligence sent shockwaves through the political landscape. Many people expressed outrage and disbelief, pointing to Gabbard’s perceived ties to Russia and her past pronouncements on Ukraine.
The comments highlighted Gabbard’s history of echoing Kremlin-approved narratives on issues like the war in Ukraine and her acceptance of campaign donations from alleged Russian agents. This, coupled with Trump’s known admiration for Vladimir Putin, fueled fears of a potential Russian takeover of US intelligence.
The internet erupted in a wave of despair and anger, with users lamenting the potential consequences of such an appointment.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood