Reports indicate that President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles within Russia, prompting concerns and potential evacuation plans in bordering Russian regions. While U.S. officials downplay the impact on the war’s overall trajectory, this move significantly boosts Ukraine’s capabilities, especially with France and the U.K. also authorizing long-range missile use. Russian officials express varying levels of concern, with some emphasizing air defense capabilities and others preparing for potential strikes on military and industrial targets. The authorization, long sought by Ukraine, follows reports of North Korean troop deployments in Russia, further escalating tensions.
Read More
President Biden’s decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles capable of striking inside Russia has elicited a furious response from the Kremlin. Russian officials, including Senator Vladimir Dzhabarov, have warned of a “serious escalation” and even “World War Three.” The Kremlin views this as direct NATO involvement, a red line previously established by President Putin. This action follows months of warnings from Russia against supplying Ukraine with such weaponry, prompting concerns about potential escalatory responses from Moscow, including retaliatory actions and adjustments to its nuclear doctrine.
Read More
Addressing a conference of North Korean battalion commanders, Kim Jong-un emphasized the urgent need to enhance the military’s warfighting capabilities. He cited escalating tensions with the U.S. and its allies as the reason for this imperative, characterizing the situation as the most dangerous in history. Kim’s call for improved combat readiness comes amidst reports of potential North Korean troop deployments to support Russia in Ukraine and growing international condemnation of the burgeoning military relationship between the two nations. The speech underscored the heightened threat perception within North Korea and its focus on military preparedness.
Read More
President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles against Russian and North Korean forces, primarily targeting Kursk Oblast, marking a significant policy shift. This decision, communicated to Kyiv days prior, aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense capabilities against a planned Russian offensive supported by North Korean troops. While not expected to alter the war’s overall trajectory, the authorization allows Ukraine to strike critical military assets and deter further aggression. The decision follows previous U.S. hesitancy and culminates from discussions initiated after Ukrainian officials presented target lists in August.
Read More
Analysis from G20 nations suggests North Korea may send up to 100,000 troops to support Russia’s war effort in Ukraine, although this deployment wouldn’t be immediate and would likely occur in stages. A source close to the Russian defense ministry indicated this troop influx is a mechanism to replace battlefield losses. This potential deployment, along with reported artillery and weapons shipments, has alarmed Kyiv’s allies and raises concerns about global implications and the deepening partnership between Putin and Kim Jong Un. The escalating situation is expected to be discussed at upcoming international summits.
Read More
Following reports that the US, UK, and France have authorized Ukraine to use long-range missiles—ATACMS, Storm Shadow, and SCALP respectively—against Russian territory, President Zelenskyy confirmed the development. He stated that the efficacy of this authorization will be demonstrated through action rather than announcement. These strikes, potentially targeting Russian and North Korean forces in Kursk Oblast, are planned for the coming days, according to multiple news sources. Zelenskyy emphasized that this long-range capability is a crucial element of his “Victory Plan.”
Read More
On November 17th, Russia launched a massive missile and drone attack on Ukraine, targeting energy infrastructure across multiple regions. Ukrainian air defenses, including F-16 fighter jets, intercepted and destroyed approximately 144 of the roughly 210 incoming projectiles. President Zelenskyy reported that Ukrainian pilots using F-16s shot down nearly 10 aerial targets during the attack. The attack caused widespread power outages and damage to critical infrastructure, highlighting the ongoing conflict’s devastating impact.
Read More
Poland’s recent deployment of advanced Korean K2 tanks along its border with Russia is a significant development that warrants attention. The sheer number of tanks, potentially reaching or exceeding 200, represents a substantial bolstering of Poland’s defensive capabilities. This deployment isn’t just about numbers; it’s about the quality of the K2 itself. Described as a cost-effective, high-performance alternative to more expensive Western tanks, the K2 offers a potent blend of firepower, speed, and advanced electronic warfare capabilities. This makes them a formidable addition to Poland’s arsenal.
This strategic move is fueled by Poland’s deep-seated animosity towards Russia, an antagonism mirroring that of Ukraine.… Continue reading
President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-provided ATACMS long-range missiles, marking a significant policy shift allowing strikes within Russia, specifically targeting areas like Kursk. This decision, following months of Ukrainian requests, enables strikes on Russian weapons stockpiles and logistical hubs to hinder military advances. While the number of ATACMS is limited and the impact may not be decisive, the authorization also potentially opens the door for similar use of British Storm Shadow missiles. The move comes amidst escalating conflict and large-scale Russian attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure.
Read More
Biden’s recent approval of Ukraine’s use of long-range U.S. weapons within Russian territory marks a significant policy shift. This decision, some argue, should have been made years ago, considering the ongoing conflict and its potential implications. The timing, however, is undeniably fraught with political significance, occurring just before a major election. Some speculate that this move is partly intended to counter potential Russian attempts to influence the election outcome by intensifying attacks on Ukraine, thereby forcing a response from the Biden administration that could be portrayed as an escalation of the war.
This shift in policy also carries implications beyond the immediate conflict in Ukraine.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood