Following Russia’s updated nuclear doctrine and Ukraine’s first use of US-supplied long-range missiles against Russian territory, the UK Prime Minister reaffirmed unwavering support for Ukraine. This commitment includes continued military aid, such as the recently supplied Storm Shadow missiles and funding for new drones. Despite Russia’s nuclear threats, the UK’s stance remains resolute, emphasizing its dedication to Ukrainian sovereignty and the necessity of ending the war. The G20 summit’s communique, while described as “disappointing” by Downing Street, ultimately affirmed support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
Read More
President Biden’s recent approval of antipersonnel mines for Ukraine marks a significant shift in US policy, reversing a long-standing stance against these controversial weapons. This decision, while intended to bolster Ukraine’s defense against the ongoing Russian invasion, has sparked considerable debate and criticism. The justification centers around the dire circumstances on the ground, where Ukraine faces a relentless onslaught and needs every advantage to defend its territory.
The argument for providing these mines highlights the escalating nature of the conflict. Russia’s use of drones dropping petal mines over Ukrainian positions underscores the already brutal reality of the war. The assertion is made that if Ukraine chooses to employ these weapons to protect itself, it should have the option to do so, particularly given the extensive demining efforts that will be required regardless of the outcome of the war.… Continue reading
Following US authorization, Ukraine reportedly launched US-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles into Russia’s Bryansk region. Russia claims to have intercepted five of eight missiles, while US officials suggest a higher number were intercepted. This attack prompted strong condemnation from Russia, accusing the US of escalating the conflict and implying direct American involvement. The incident coincided with Russia’s announcement of revised nuclear doctrine, expanding conditions for nuclear weapon use, further raising international tensions.
Read More
Recent IDF operations in South Lebanon uncovered a significant quantity of Russian-made weapons in Hezbollah’s possession, including recently manufactured anti-tank missiles. These weapons, some originating from Russian stockpiles in Syria, contradict prior assessments of Hezbollah’s arsenal and indicate a deepening relationship between Russia and the Iran-backed group. This discovery has heightened Israeli concerns about Moscow’s neutrality in the conflict and prompted calls for a more assertive Israeli response to Russian support for Hezbollah. The presence of advanced Russian weaponry, like the Kornet anti-tank missile, has proven highly effective in Hezbollah’s attacks against Israeli forces.
Read More
Reports indicate that North Korea has deployed troops to support Russia’s war effort in Ukraine, with estimates ranging from 11,000 to 100,000 soldiers. While the North Korean army lacks recent combat experience, some units, like the elite 11th Corps, possess specialized training in infiltration and sabotage. Moscow’s motivation is to alleviate manpower shortages, while Pyongyang likely seeks financial compensation and access to Russian military technology. The deployment’s effectiveness remains uncertain due to language barriers and unfamiliar equipment, although some believe their unique training may prove valuable.
Read More
Recent IDF operations in southern Lebanon uncovered significant stockpiles of Russian-made weaponry in Hezbollah’s possession, including advanced anti-tank missiles like the Kornet, manufactured as recently as 2020. These weapons, transported via Syria, represent a more extensive and sophisticated arsenal than previously understood, exceeding earlier assessments of Soviet-era equipment. The discovery highlights the scale of Russian arms transfers to Hezbollah and their role in ongoing attacks against Israel. This revelation underscores the limitations of prior intelligence gathering due to restricted access to southern Lebanon since 2006.
Read More
Analysis suggests that recent Ukrainian strikes on a Russian military depot, utilizing US-supplied long-range missiles, targeted ammunition supplies supporting Russian forces in the Kursk region. Western intelligence likely aided the precision of these strikes, which were well within the missiles’ range. While initial reports suggested restrictions on missile use to the Kursk area, Ukraine will likely argue that the attack, approximately 120 miles from Kursk, directly supports their efforts to disrupt Russian logistics there. The efficacy of Russian air defenses against the six missiles fired remains unclear.
Read More
Following Ukraine’s reported use of U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles to strike a Russian military facility, Russia’s foreign minister accused the West of seeking escalation. This attack prompted Russia to invoke its updated nuclear doctrine, which considers aggression against Russia supported by a nuclear power a joint attack, potentially justifying nuclear retaliation. While some analysts believe Russia’s nuclear threats are a bluff, others suggest the Kremlin’s actions, including mass production of mobile bomb shelters, indicate serious preparations for a potential nuclear conflict. The situation raises concerns about the potential for escalation and the impact of the upcoming U.S. presidential administration’s approach to the conflict.
Read More
On the 1000th day of the war, Ukraine reportedly launched six American-made ATACMS missiles into Russia, targeting a military facility in the Bryansk region. Russia claims to have intercepted five of the missiles, resulting in minimal damage and no casualties. This attack, the first confirmed use of ATACMS missiles by Ukraine inside Russia, coincided with Russia announcing a lowered threshold for nuclear retaliation, specifically mentioning the use of Western-supplied long-range missiles as a potential trigger. This new nuclear doctrine, signed by Putin, significantly escalates tensions in the ongoing conflict.
Read More
Putin sees America hurtling towards disaster, and he believes Donald Trump is the driver steering the nation towards the precipice. This isn’t simply a matter of political disagreement; it’s a calculated assessment of a strategy unfolding successfully. The perception isn’t just of internal strife, but a deliberate fracturing of American society, weakening the nation from within.
The idea that a weakened, divided America benefits Russia isn’t a new one. It’s rooted in the belief that internal conflict diminishes a nation’s global influence, making it less of a threat and potentially more susceptible to external pressures. This isn’t a matter of military conquest; it’s about subtle manipulation and the exploitation of existing social and political divisions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood