Former President Barack Obama expressed concerns regarding the Trump administration’s increasing use of the military for domestic operations, citing threats to due process and civil liberties. His comments followed a Department of Homeland Security request for support from Naval Station Great Lakes in Illinois for potential immigration crackdowns, mirroring President Trump’s recent deployment of National Guard troops elsewhere. Illinois leaders have vowed to resist any military mobilization in Chicago, with Governor JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson opposing the presence of troops. This situation has led to political tensions, especially given Trump’s criticisms of Chicago’s crime rates and Pritzker’s response, with no official decisions made yet regarding the DHS request.
Read More
President Trump’s threats to deploy the National Guard to Democratic-run cities like Chicago are facing significant pushback. Representative Jesús (Chuy) García of Illinois denounces the plan as a “charade” and a waste of time, emphasizing that Chicago has seen decreases in serious crimes despite the president’s characterization. García views the move as politically motivated, aimed at creating a distraction and creating a show of force, as well as being unpopular. Illinois officials are considering all options, including legal challenges and peaceful demonstrations, to prevent the mobilization of the National Guard.
Read More
Chicago officials, including Mayor Johnson, are strongly opposing potential federal intervention, including military deployment, in the city, emphasizing that they haven’t requested assistance and that crime rates are actually declining. This opposition comes in response to former President Trump’s suggestion of intervening in Chicago, echoing previous actions in other cities like Los Angeles. Illinois leaders, alongside the mayor, have emphasized their intention to pursue legal action if necessary, citing the Tenth Amendment to limit federal authority. The Trump administration had previously invoked Title 10 of the federal code to justify troop deployments elsewhere despite state objections.
Read More
According to The Washington Post, the Pentagon has been planning a military deployment to Chicago, potentially serving as a model for similar actions in other cities, particularly those run by Democrats. Multiple plans are being considered, including the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops. Meanwhile, Trump has threatened to send troops to Baltimore, despite declining crime rates in both cities. Local officials like Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson have strongly opposed Trump’s plans, viewing them as an authoritarian overreach and an unconstitutional power grab.
Read More
Amidst escalating plans to militarize more US cities, a leading Democrat accused Donald Trump of manufacturing a crisis to justify sending federalized National Guard troops into Chicago, over the objections of local leaders. The White House has reportedly been working on these plans, while the mayor of Chicago and the governor of Illinois both stated they had not requested federal assistance. Trump has stated that the people of Chicago are “screaming” for assistance, despite statistics showing a decline in serious crime in the city.
Read More
Pritzker slams Trump’s threat to target Chicago next: ‘We don’t play those games’ is the headline, and it’s a stark declaration. The situation feels charged with tension. The responses paint a picture of real concern, with a lot of fear bubbling under the surface. The core of it is this: Trump, possibly motivated by political vendettas or a desire to exert control, is purportedly eyeing Chicago as the next target for some kind of federal intervention, possibly involving the deployment of troops. The potential consequences are heavy, and the air is thick with what-ifs.
The sentiment seems to be, “Get ready.”… Continue reading
For weeks, the Pentagon has been developing plans for a military deployment to Chicago. President Trump intends to address crime, homelessness, and undocumented immigration with this initiative. Officials suggest this approach could serve as a template for similar deployments in other major cities.
Read More
Without support, the ability to report the truth is compromised, leaving vulnerable voices unheard. This organization is committed to providing unwavering, fact-based journalism and relies on reader support to maintain its strength, especially during challenging times. Initial contributions were vital in establishing the newsroom’s foundation. Now, continued support is crucial to ensure the organization’s ability to continue its mission.
Read More
President Trump has announced plans to expand his federalized crime crackdown, currently implemented in Washington, D.C., to other major cities. During a recent press conference, Trump stated that Chicago would likely be the next city to receive federal intervention, followed by New York. Trump cited an alleged desire from residents and praised the success of the D.C. takeover, which has seen increased arrests and a federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department. These plans follow Trump’s declaration of a public safety emergency and deployment of the National Guard in D.C., which have been met with both praise and protests.
Read More
President Trump has indicated that Chicago is the next city targeted for federal intervention, following the current occupation in Washington, D.C., drawing strong opposition from local officials. Trump’s declaration of a public safety emergency and the deployment of federal forces, despite decreasing crime rates in several cities, has been met with accusations of authoritarian overreach. While Trump faces legal obstacles to controlling local police departments in Chicago, officials like Mayor Johnson and Governor Pritzker have vehemently rejected the idea, citing existing crime reduction efforts and community violence intervention programs. Elected officials across Illinois have unified in their condemnation of Trump’s threats, highlighting concerns about the impact on vulnerable communities and the prioritization of political spectacle over effective public safety measures.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood