Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, chief of Russia’s NBC protection forces, was killed in a Moscow bomb attack, a day after Ukraine’s security service (SBU) charged him with using banned chemical weapons. The SBU claimed responsibility, calling Kirillov a legitimate target for his alleged war crimes. This follows a pattern of targeted killings of prominent figures on both sides of the conflict, including several high-profile Russians. Kirillov, sanctioned internationally, frequently accused Ukraine of using toxic agents—allegations dismissed by Ukraine and its allies.
Read More
Following the overthrow of the Syrian government, Israel launched airstrikes targeting suspected chemical weapons sites and long-range rockets to prevent them from falling into the hands of hostile actors. These actions, according to Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, were solely to ensure Israel’s security. The strikes occurred amidst concerns about a security vacuum and the rise of various armed factions in a now unstable Syria. Simultaneously, the U.S. conducted separate airstrikes targeting ISIS, while Turkey’s actions against the Syrian Democratic Forces further complicated the already volatile situation.
Read More
Israeli military actions targeting Assad regime chemical weapons sites as opposition forces advance on Damascus represent a complex strategic maneuver with potentially far-reaching consequences. The timing, coinciding with the opposition’s push towards the capital, suggests a calculated effort to prevent these dangerous weapons from falling into the wrong hands.
This proactive approach is understandable given the volatile nature of the Syrian conflict. The diverse array of groups vying for power—ranging from genuinely pro-democracy activists to extremist factions like ISIS—introduces immense uncertainty about who might ultimately control Syria. With such a chaotic and unpredictable landscape, the risk of chemical weapons being misused is exponentially amplified.… Continue reading
Russian forces have employed chemical weapons on the battlefield in Ukraine on a significant scale, with 323 instances reported in October alone, according to the Ukrainian General Staff. These attacks, which include the use of prohibited munitions like K-51 and RG-VO, violate international conventions and pose a serious threat to Ukrainian soldiers and civilians. The frequency of chemical attacks has increased since the invasion began, with Ukrainian troops reporting multiple attacks daily, and the tactic appears to be effective for Russia in capturing positions without significant destruction. While the precise chemicals used remain unclear in some cases, the United States has confirmed the use of chloropicrin, a hazardous agent known to cause severe irritation and damage to exposed individuals.
Read More
The news of Russians actively using chemical weapons against the Armed Forces of Ukraine is not surprising, but it is deeply troubling. The International Security Institute has reported that the Russians are employing a combination of tear gas and a small molecule that causes extreme nausea and vomiting, slipping through less sophisticated gas mask filters. This intentional use of chemical weapons is a blatant violation of international treaties on war crimes.
The Russians seem to be testing the limits and boundaries of what they can get away with. They are not using more extreme chemical weapons like mustard gas, probably to avoid severe consequences.… Continue reading
The confirmation that Russia is using banned chemical weapons, specifically Chloropicrin gas, against Ukrainian Armed Forces is not only alarming but also raises serious questions about international norms and accountability. The use of such chemical weapons, which have devastating effects including severe nausea and the ability to penetrate protective gear, is a clear violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention. The fact that Russia is resorting to such tactics in its aggression against Ukraine is a stark reminder of the brutality of war and the lengths to which some states will go to achieve their objectives.
The implications of Russia’s use of banned chemical weapons go beyond the immediate battlefield.… Continue reading
Russia’s recent actions in Ukraine have once again shed light on the brutality of war and the lengths to which some nations will go to achieve their objectives, regardless of international laws and conventions. The recent investigation by The Telegraph revealing Russia’s systematic use of illegal chemical attacks against Ukrainian soldiers is not just a violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention but also a stark reminder of the inhumanity that persists in modern warfare.
The firsthand accounts of Ukrainian soldiers paint a chilling picture of daily life on the front lines, where tear gas grenades dropped by small drones have become a common occurrence.… Continue reading
Russian forces employing new poison gas grenades, says armament research centre
As a soldier, it deeply troubles me to confront the reality that chemical weapons might become a normalized part of future conflicts. The recent report from the armament research centre about Russian forces employing new poison gas grenades only confirms this disheartening trend. With each passing day, it seems that Russia finds a way to sink even deeper into the depths of inhumanity.
One cannot help but wonder about the consequences of such actions. After countless war crimes committed by Russian forces, there have been empty promises of serious repercussions and accountability.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood