Witness accounts describe the use of unconventional gases against protestors in Iran, causing symptoms far more severe than those associated with standard tear gas. These symptoms included intense burning, respiratory distress, and sudden loss of movement, leading to collapse. Eyewitnesses reported the gases were deployed in crowded areas and escape routes, often coinciding with gunfire. The reported incidents occurred in multiple cities, with videos from Sabzevar showing security forces equipped with protective gear designed for hazardous chemical materials.
Read More
Witnesses in multiple Iranian cities reported experiencing symptoms far exceeding those typically associated with tear gas during recent crackdowns on protestors. These symptoms included severe breathing difficulties, sudden loss of movement, and intense burning sensations. Accounts described gas canisters fired into crowds and along escape routes, with some witnesses reporting gunfire coinciding with the onset of incapacitation. Videos from Sabzevar showed security forces in chemical-hazard protective gear, and medical experts noted that the described symptoms were inconsistent with standard tear gas exposure, suggesting the potential use of other irritating chemical substances.
Read More
Evidence gathered by the BBC suggests Georgian authorities used a World War One-era chemical weapon, “camite,” against anti-government protesters. Protesters reported severe and long-lasting symptoms, including burning skin, breathing difficulties, and vomiting, corroborated by medical studies. Experts and former police officials identified the likely use of this obsolete chemical agent, which was mixed into water cannons. The Georgian government denies the findings, but the BBC’s investigation highlights the potential use of a dangerous substance with lasting effects, raising concerns under international law.
Read More
Russia unleashes toxic ammonia cloud but fails to save trapped forces near Pokrovsk – that’s the headline, and it paints a grim picture. It seems we’re dealing with another chapter in a conflict that’s already seen a devastating disregard for the rules of engagement. This incident, as described, involves the deliberate release of a toxic chemical – in this case, ammonia – in an attempt to gain a military advantage. But as the story unfolds, it’s clear the strategy backfired, becoming a tragic illustration of strategic ineptitude and a shocking disregard for the lives of their own soldiers.
The use of chemical weapons, regardless of the specific agent, immediately raises a red flag.… Continue reading
Evidence indicates that Russian forces are deploying chemical weapons in Ukraine, violating international laws. Investigations have identified several Russian units, including motorized rifle brigades and drone detachments, utilizing RG-Vo gas grenades against Ukrainian troops. Intercepted communications and video footage reveal the 114th and 136th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigades’ involvement, with documented requests for grenade deliveries. Furthermore, the Scientific Research Institute of Applied Chemistry and other entities are supplying the components for these weapons, despite international sanctions.
Read More
The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) has presented evidence to The Hague detailing over 10,000 instances of alleged Russian chemical weapons usage against Ukrainian troops since the full-scale invasion began in 2022. The evidence, including materials delivered to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), points to the frequent use of banned riot control agents and toxic compounds like chloropicrin, often deployed via drones. These attacks have been concentrated in eastern Ukraine, violating the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention signed by Russia. International investigations and sanctions have been initiated, with Dutch intelligence corroborating the findings and expressing concern over the normalization of these practices.
Read More
Ukraine claims Russia has launched 10,000 chemical strikes since the invasion began, and that’s a seriously concerning number. It immediately brings to mind the horrors of chemical warfare, a violation of international laws and a throwback to the devastating tactics of World War I. It makes you wonder, is Russia just ignoring the lessons of history, or perhaps, the existing laws? It’s a frightening thought, and the implications are enormous.
Looking deeper into this claim, the details become even more troubling. While the Ukrainian reports are out there, the specifics about the attacks themselves seem to vary. Some reports suggest the use of tear gas-like agents, which, while not as deadly as nerve agents, are still illegal under international agreements.… Continue reading
According to European diplomats, Russia is escalating its use of chemical weapons in Ukraine, aiming to inflict maximum suffering. Intelligence reports from Germany and the Netherlands indicate a growing trend, with over 9,000 instances of chemical weapon use since the invasion’s onset. The Dutch Defence Minister noted over 2,500 reported cases of chemical weapon-related symptoms in Ukraine, resulting in three deaths. The United States has also accused Russia of using chloropicrin, a banned choking agent, despite Russia’s commitment to the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Read More
The international community, including Russia, has ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention, which prohibits chemical weapons use and production. Amidst intensified Russian attacks on Ukraine, concerns are growing in the EU. While the U.S. has announced support for sanctions and weapon purchases for Ukraine, the timeline and financial burden-sharing remain points of contention for European officials.
Read More
Dutch and German intelligence agencies have reported Russia’s intensified use of chemical weapons in Ukraine, including the banned choking agent chloropicrin, based on extensive evidence. These agencies claim Russia is employing these weapons on a large scale, causing concern about the potential continuation of such actions. While Russia and Ukraine deny using these weapons, the Dutch Defence Minister is calling for more sanctions as a result. Meanwhile, the OPCW states that previous accusations have not been “substantiated.”
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood