Senator Chris Murphy’s warnings about Donald Trump’s plan to cripple American democracy are deeply concerning and warrant serious consideration. The core of his concern lies in a pattern of actions and stated intentions that paint a disturbing picture of a deliberate attempt to dismantle the established system of checks and balances. This isn’t simply partisan rhetoric; it’s a projection of a meticulously planned strategy that leverages the power of the presidency to consolidate authority and erode democratic norms.
The plan, as it appears, hinges on several key components, each designed to weaken the opposition and solidify power within the executive branch.… Continue reading
Efforts by Trump to circumvent the Senate’s “advice and consent” role in confirming appointments are unconstitutional. Proposed methods, including using recess appointments during a manufactured Senate recess or employing the president’s power to adjourn Congress, are legally flawed and contradict established constitutional interpretations and historical precedent. These schemes would represent an abuse of power, undermining the checks and balances integral to American self-governance. The Senate’s refusal to cooperate and potential judicial intervention would be crucial in preventing such an autocratic maneuver. Such actions are not only unlawful but fundamentally disrespectful of the Constitution.
Read More
Despite lacking a legal mandate, FBI background checks for presidential nominees have been standard practice. President-elect Trump’s reported intention to bypass this process raises serious concerns about national security. Existing memoranda of understanding between the Department of Justice, the President, and the Senate Judiciary Committee provide avenues for President Biden and the Senate to initiate investigations, even without Trump’s cooperation. This action is crucial to uphold the Senate’s advice and consent role and safeguard against potentially unqualified or compromised nominees. Failure to act would set a dangerous precedent, undermining checks and balances.
Read More
Don’t Believe John Roberts. The Supreme Court Just Made the President a King.
When I first read about the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding the immunity of presidents for official acts, I was taken aback. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. argued that a prosecutor cannot use a president’s official acts as evidence of a crime, effectively creating a shield of immunity for sitting and former presidents. This decision just feels like a dangerous step towards unchecked power and authoritarianism.
The dissenting views, especially from Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, highlighted the potential loopholes and dangers of this ruling.… Continue reading
As an individual who is deeply concerned about the current state of our country and the decisions being made by our leaders, I cannot help but feel troubled by the recent news of a federal judge ordering the Biden Administration to resume permits for gas exports. The fact that President Biden had paused new natural gas export terminals to thoroughly assess their effects on the climate, economy, and national security speaks volumes about his dedication to making informed and responsible decisions for the well-being of our nation.
However, the fact that a federal judge disagreed with President Biden’s decision and ordered the administration to resume the permits is a clear indication of the power struggle that seems to be unfolding within our government.… Continue reading
As an American citizen, I am deeply troubled by the recent decision made by the Supreme Court. The very foundation of our nation, the idea that Presidents are not Kings, has been upended. The conservative justices, claiming to be originalists, have chosen to ignore history altogether, thereby creating a shocking new precedent: the president is above the law. This ruling is a dangerous step towards turning the President into a monarch, erasing the principles on which the United States was founded.
The concept of a President being above the law is antithetical to the core values of democracy. George Washington himself rejected any idea of being a king, firmly establishing the notion that the United States would never bow to such authoritarian rule.… Continue reading
As a concerned citizen watching the recent Supreme Court decision on Trump’s immunity case, I am left feeling a sense of deep unease about the implications this ruling holds for our democracy. The 6-3 vote along ideological lines, with Chief Justice Roberts affirming that presidents enjoy immunity for “official acts” but not for “unofficial acts”, sets a dangerous precedent. This ruling essentially shields a president from prosecution for actions carried out within their scope of authority, no matter how egregious those actions may be.
The dissent by Justice Sotomayor eloquently outlines the grave consequences of this decision, emphasizing how it fundamentally alters the relationship between the President and the American people.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker