A significant portion of the Justice Department’s Federal Programs Branch, responsible for defending Trump administration policies, has departed or announced their departure since the election. Reuters reported that nearly two-thirds of the approximately 110 lawyers in the unit have left. These departures could pose challenges for the unit, particularly as it faces numerous lawsuits related to controversial policies. The DOJ is actively recruiting replacements and reallocating personnel to maintain its litigation capacity, but the impact on the department’s ability to defend the President’s agenda in court remains to be seen.
Read More
Recent reports indicate a significant departure of lawyers from the Department of Justice’s Federal Programs Branch, with approximately two-thirds of the staff resigning since the 2024 election. This high turnover stems from frustration over the numerous legal challenges to President Trump’s policies, including those related to immigration, trade, and federal agency restructuring, with some lawyers citing ethical concerns. Sources suggest this level of attrition is unprecedented for a presidential administration mid-term, prompting the White House to exempt the DOJ from hiring freezes. Despite the departures, the administration maintains its policies are legal and will continue to defend them in court.
Read More
Two-thirds of the DOJ unit defending Trump policies in court have quit. That’s the headline, and it’s a significant one. This isn’t some minor reshuffling; it’s a mass exodus from a specific branch of the Justice Department, the Federal Programs Branch. What’s important to note is that these departures were voluntary. This wasn’t a situation of being forced out for disagreeing with the administration. These lawyers made a conscious choice to leave.
The voluntary nature of these departures suggests a deeper issue. It implies these professionals were making a stand based on their own values and principles. It’s hard to ignore the potential ethical concerns that might have driven them to such a decision.… Continue reading
I am deeply saddened to hear of the passing of Paul Alexander, the 78-year-old Dallas man who lived in an iron lung for most of his life. His story is nothing short of remarkable, filled with resilience, determination, and an unwavering spirit that defied the odds stacked against him. I can’t help but be in awe of his ability to persevere through such challenging circumstances, showing the world that limitations are merely obstacles waiting to be overcome.
Paul Alexander’s ability to adapt and thrive despite the confines of his iron lung is an inspiration to us all. Learning how to gulp in air through glossopharyngeal breathing, he found ways to leave the iron lung for parts of the day, eventually passing the bar to become a lawyer and opening a successful law practice.… Continue reading
Trump says he’s looking for new lawyers on Truth Social amid report he’s not “happy” after $83M loss. It’s no secret that Donald Trump has always had issues with his legal representation. Many have criticized his choice of lawyers, claiming that they are not competent enough to handle his cases. However, the truth is that it’s not the lawyers’ fault that he keeps losing his cases – it’s because he’s guilty.
I can’t help but think that every decent lawyer he comes across probably advises him to settle or plea bargain. But Trump’s ego won’t allow him to accept that he’s in the wrong.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood