Elon Musk initially agreed to appear on Jon Stewart’s Daily Show, conditioned on the interview airing unedited, a condition Stewart readily accepted. However, Musk later reneged, labeling Stewart a partisan propagandist. Stewart responded by highlighting the hypocrisy of Musk’s claim, given his appearances on right-wing platforms, and challenged Musk to drop the pretense of neutrality. Stewart ultimately concluded that Musk’s refusal stemmed not from Stewart’s purported bias, but from a conflict of interest concerning Musk’s own views.
Read More
Following Jon Stewart’s passionate “Daily Show” critique of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, which resulted in Stewart injuring his hand, Musk conditionally agreed to appear on the show for an interview. Musk’s acceptance was contingent upon the interview airing unedited. “The Daily Show” enthusiastically accepted Musk’s terms. The interview’s confirmation, however, remains pending.
Read More
CBS must defend our free press, not settle Trump’s $20 billion lawsuit. This isn’t just about a massive payout; it’s about the very principle of a free and independent press. To settle would set a dangerous precedent, emboldening powerful figures to silence dissent through financial intimidation. It would signal to other potential litigants that such tactics work, chilling free speech across the media landscape.
CBS’s potential capitulation isn’t simply a matter of cost-benefit analysis. While the financial implications of a protracted legal battle are undeniable, the far greater cost lies in the damage to the credibility and independence of the press.… Continue reading
Following a “60 Minutes” report on USAID, Elon Musk accused the program of deceptive editing and election interference, calling for its staff to face prison sentences. This follows President Trump’s own call for the show’s termination, stemming from a lawsuit alleging deceptive editing of a Vice President Harris interview. CBS maintains the edits were truthful and informative, and recently released unedited footage. The network is reportedly considering a settlement, despite internal concerns about potential further legal repercussions. Musk’s attack further escalates the ongoing conflict between the Trump administration and CBS.
Read More
Donald Trump’s lawsuit against CBS and subsequent FCC investigation, stemming from a *60 Minutes* interview with Kamala Harris, are baseless. The released transcript fully refutes Trump’s claims of “election interference” and journalistic misconduct, revealing his accusations to be a misrepresentation of standard editing practices. CBS’s editing of Harris’s response to a question about Israel involved using a more concise portion of her answer, not replacing it with a fabricated one. The FCC’s consideration of the complaint is a concerning abuse of power, driven by Trump’s personal vendetta and a questionable interpretation of broadcast regulations.
Read More
Compelled by the FCC chairman, CBS will provide unedited transcripts and camera footage of its Kamala Harris interview. This action stems from a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Donald Trump, alleging deceptive editing to favor Harris. The network maintains its editing practices were standard and denies wrongdoing, while press freedom advocates closely monitor the situation and potential settlement talks. Trump’s continued pursuit of the lawsuit, despite his election win, highlights the ongoing tension between the former president and media outlets. Similar past settlements between Trump and other media organizations have involved substantial financial payouts.
Read More
When I first heard about Kristi Noem’s disastrous interview on CBS, I couldn’t help but cringe at the absurdity of the situation. The fact that she openly admitted to shooting a 14-month-old puppy in the face, under the guise of protecting her children from a “dangerous animal,” is beyond comprehension. As someone who values empathy and compassion, I was truly taken aback by her lack of remorse or regret for such a heinous act.
It’s baffling to me how someone could think that sharing a story about shooting a dog would in any way boost their credibility or garner sympathy. The professor in my screenwriting class once said that if a villain isn’t hated enough, have them kick a dog.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood