Military struck drug boat in Caribbean 4 times in Sept. 2 attack, says US official: Let’s break this down. The news that the military targeted a boat in the Caribbean and hit it not once, but four times, immediately raises a lot of questions. It’s the kind of headline that grabs your attention and makes you want to dig deeper. The initial reaction is a mix of shock and disbelief. Did they really need to hit it four times? What was on the boat? And why so many strikes?
The use of four strikes suggests more than just an attempt to disable a vessel.… Continue reading
Pete Hegseth, the US Secretary of Defense, should be charged with murder due to his involvement in strikes on boats in the Caribbean, resulting in the deaths of approximately 83 civilians. Despite claims of a “war” against drug cartels, the article argues that these actions constitute murder, as the victims were unarmed civilians not posing an imminent threat. Even if a war were declared, international laws of war still prohibit the intentional killing of non-combatants, making the attacks war crimes. Hegseth’s alleged order to “kill everybody” after an initial strike and his subsequent statements reinforce the argument that his actions are criminal and warrant prosecution under federal murder statutes.
Read More
House Republican: Second US strike on alleged Caribbean drug boat ‘would be an illegal act’ – that’s the core of the issue we’re talking about, and it’s a statement that really hits home. The general consensus, judging by the available information, seems to be that a second strike, targeting a boat suspected of drug trafficking in the Caribbean, would indeed be an illegal act. But it’s not just about a second strike. Many people are saying the first strike was also an illegal act, and some are even calling it a war crime or murder.
It’s clear that there are serious concerns about the legality and morality of these actions.… Continue reading
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has dismissed reports of potentially illegal orders regarding military strikes in the Caribbean as “fake news,” maintaining that the attacks were lawful. These remarks followed a Washington Post report alleging Hegseth ordered the killing of everyone on targeted boats, with over 80 people killed in the strikes so far. In response to the reports, a Senate committee announced an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the military operations. The administration justifies the strikes by claiming those on the boats are drug traffickers, primarily members of Tren de Aragua, though the administration’s claims about the nature of those killed, along with the legality of the attacks, are being questioned.
Read More
Following an initial strike on a suspected drug vessel in the Caribbean on September 2, the US military conducted a follow-up strike after assessing there were survivors. This second attack resulted in the deaths of the remaining crew, bringing the total death toll to 11 and sinking the ship. The administration has since faced scrutiny, as the President announced the strike, but has never publicly acknowledged killing survivors. Legal experts and members of Congress have raised concerns, with some arguing the strikes violate the law of armed conflict by executing individuals who are “hors de combat.” This has led to the UK ceasing intelligence sharing with the US due to concerns over the legality of these actions.
Read More
Reports indicate that the U.S. military may have committed war crimes in the Caribbean, targeting survivors of an initial strike on a vessel suspected of drug smuggling. Allegedly, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the killing of all individuals on the vessel, leading to a second strike that eliminated two survivors. Legal experts condemn the actions as violations of international law, and potential war crimes, regardless of the mission’s classification. The administration has denied any wrongdoing, however, and criticized Democratic lawmakers who have called for investigations.
Read More
A Washington Post report reveals Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth allegedly ordered the killing of all survivors in a second strike on a vessel in the Caribbean, carried out by SEAL Team 6 after two survivors were spotted. This followed an initial strike that left no survivors on a vessel carrying narcotics. Following the incident, protocols were altered to prioritize rescuing survivors. Since September, U.S. forces have downed at least 22 vessels, resulting in a minimum of 83 fatalities, sparking tensions and accusations of a broader military strategy in the region.
Read More
The US is facing scrutiny from G7 foreign ministers regarding recent military strikes in the Caribbean, targeting vessels suspected of carrying drugs. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot criticized the operations, citing potential instability in the region where France has overseas territories and concerns of unlawfulness, marking a rare rebuke of US actions. These strikes, which have resulted in at least 75 reported deaths, have led to questions about legal justification, with the US arguing self-defense while international experts raise concerns of war crimes. The G7 meeting, chaired by Canada, also focused on support for Ukraine and addressed the conflict in Sudan, but the Caribbean strikes were a central talking point.
Read More
French foreign minister says US military operations in Caribbean violate international law, and this has stirred up quite a debate. It’s a bold statement, and it’s certainly not something we hear every day, especially from a major ally. It makes you think about the complexities of international law, the exercise of power, and, of course, the ever-shifting landscape of global politics. The core of the issue seems to be the methods the US is using, with some describing them as extrajudicial executions, carried out without trials, and seemingly outside the bounds of established legal frameworks.
This brings up a fundamental question: When is a country’s right to act in its own defense, or in the name of fighting illegal activities like drug trafficking, justified?… Continue reading
The UK has reportedly ceased sharing some intelligence with the US regarding suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean due to concerns over American strikes against these boats. The US has conducted numerous strikes, resulting in a significant number of fatalities, which have raised questions about potential breaches of international law. The UK, which possesses intelligence assets in the Caribbean and previously assisted the US in identifying vessels, is withholding information to avoid being complicit in actions that may be illegal. This move follows the UN human rights chief’s assessment that the strikes constitute extrajudicial killings, adding further scrutiny to the situation.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker