The Shopping Trends team has observed a growing trend in consumer behavior and is reporting on it. They are sharing insights gleaned from analyzing shopping patterns. The team’s recommendations may include commission-based links, offering readers opportunities to purchase featured items. It is important to note that the team operates independently from the CTV News journalists.
A federal judge believes the immigrant defendant, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, may have been targeted with a criminal charge by the Justice Department out of vindictiveness for suing the Trump administration. The judge is allowing further evidence gathering and a hearing to investigate this claim, potentially including testimony from officials. This follows Abrego Garcia’s wrongful removal to El Salvador and subsequent indictment for transporting undocumented immigrants after a 2022 traffic stop, with the timing of the charges being unusually delayed. Furthermore, public statements from administration officials and a Deputy Attorney General’s comments on TV have raised suspicions of an improper motive, potentially providing direct evidence of vindictiveness.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national, was released from a Tennessee jail on Friday, allowing him to reunite with his family in Maryland while awaiting trial on human smuggling charges. The case gained attention after he was mistakenly deported in March and brought back to the U.S. by the Trump administration. Following a court order, Abrego Garcia was granted pretrial release. Although he faces a smuggling case, defense attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the charges, alleging they were retaliatory. Despite the release, Homeland Security officials still plan to deport him to an unnamed third country.
Acting Justice Juan Merchan rejected Donald Trump’s claim of presidential immunity in the hush-money case, ruling that the actions were personal, not official. Trump denounced the decision as illegal and politically motivated, claiming it disregarded Supreme Court precedent and constituted a “rigged hoax.” The ruling maintains a gag order preventing Trump from publicly discussing the case. This decision, according to Trump, threatens the future of the presidency.
Following Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts related to hush-money payments, his motion to dismiss the case was opposed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. Bragg argued that presidential immunity does not apply and suggested a temporary delay in proceedings to avoid interfering with presidential duties, not a dismissal. Both Bragg and the New York attorney general’s office contend the case will not impede Trump’s official functions. The dispute’s resolution could extend into Trump’s presidency, potentially delaying sentencing until after his term.
A Vestre Landsret ruling overturned a drug conviction due to flawed forensic analysis. The court rejected evidence from gas chromatography, a method converting the legal THC-A into the illegal THC, rendering THC content measurements unreliable. This prompted the Rigsadvokaten to review all cannabis-related cases since 2018, involving approximately 650 cases where the distinction between THC and THC-A was not made. The Landsforeningen af Forsvarsadvokater supports this review, stating that convictions based on flawed evidence are unacceptable.
John Q. Hosedrinker