Candace Owens

Candace Owens Tour Cancellation Leaves 15000 Australians Without Refunds

None of the 15,000 ticket holders for Candace Owens’ cancelled Australian tour are expected to receive refunds from the promoter, Rocksman, which has collapsed with minimal assets. Owens herself claims to be owed hundreds of thousands of dollars, asserting she was misled by Rocksman, a company with ties to Turning Point Australia. The promoter’s liquidator has determined that refunds are impossible due to a lack of insurance and the company having spent all its funds, with debts exceeding $760,000.

Read More

MAGA’s Internal Strife: Divisions and Disarray Emerge

The article highlights extensive infighting within the MAGA movement, encompassing various prominent figures and groups. Candace Owens’ conspiracy theories regarding Charlie Kirk’s death have sparked intense conflict, drawing criticism from fellow right-wing media personalities. Furthermore, internal squabbles are evident within the White House, as well as amongst political influencers. Despite the constant bickering, the MAGA movement continues to cause real-world harm, including devastating USAID cuts and discrimination.

Read More

Candace Owens Loses Legal Battle, Barred from Entering Australia

The Australian High Court upheld the government’s decision to deny a visa to U.S. influencer Candace Owens, who sought to undertake a speaking tour. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke rejected her visa application, citing concerns that her views could incite discord, referencing her history of downplaying the Holocaust and making Islamophobic comments. Owens appealed to the court, arguing the decision burdened political communication, but the court ruled in favor of the government, stating the Migration Act served a justifiable purpose in protecting the Australian community. The court cited Owens’ “extremist and inflammatory comments” as failing the “character test,” with similar concerns leading to the cancellation of rapper Ye’s visa earlier in the year.

Read More

Candace Owens Denied Entry to Australia: Reactions and Free Speech Debate

Far-right US influencer Candace Owens loses legal fight to enter Australia. Well, that’s certainly a turn of events, isn’t it? It seems Candace Owens, a figure known for her often provocative and controversial views, won’t be gracing the shores of Australia any time soon. The details of the legal fight aren’t fully clear here, but the outcome is definitive – she’s been denied entry. You have to wonder what her reaction was to that news.

It brings up a lot of interesting points, though, doesn’t it? Like, what does it say about a country when it refuses entry to a public figure?… Continue reading

Australia’s High Court Upholds Visa Denial for Candace Owens

The Australian High Court has upheld the government’s 2024 decision to deny Candace Owens a visa. The court determined that the Home Affairs Minister’s denial did not violate any constitutional freedoms. The minister refused the visa due to concerns that Owens’ views, including minimizing the Holocaust, had the potential to incite discord and fail the “character test” under the Migration Act. The court found the minister did not misinterpret the law in making this decision, ultimately dismissing Owens’ challenge.

Read More

Candace Owens Left Out: Online Reactions to Charlie Kirk Memorial

When submitting comments or replies, adhere to the following guidelines. Prohibited are comments that violate Turkish law, glorify criminal acts, or contain profanity, insults, or hate speech. Avoid racist, sexist, or harassing language that infringes upon personal rights. Comments should also adhere to Turkish grammar and punctuation rules. Avoid writing comments entirely in capital letters, and refrain from advertising or promoting products or services. Finally, do not share personal information and understand that users are legally responsible for their comments and that information may be shared with authorities if requested.

Read More

Macron to Offer “Scientific Evidence” to US Court in Brigitte Controversy, Lawyer Says

In a defamation suit against Candace Owens, Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron plan to present photographic and scientific evidence to a US court to refute Owens’ claims that Brigitte Macron was born male. Their lawyer, Tom Clare, stated that the couple finds these allegations incredibly upsetting. The evidence, which will be presented in court, aims to definitively prove the falsity of the claims, despite the discomfort of doing so publicly. The Macrons’ suit, filed in the US, alleges Owens knowingly spread false information and disregarded credible evidence.

Read More

Trump’s Actions in DC: A Fascist Threat and a Sign of Things to Come?

Candace Owens expressed panic regarding the Macrons’ lawsuit, labeling it a “foreign invasion.” She criticized the silence of Trump and others, arguing they should defend the First Amendment and condemn the legal action against her. Owens stated that the job of the federal government is to defend against foreign invaders, claiming Macron is acting as one. This response came after Owens spread misinformation about the French First Lady.

Read More

FBI Chief’s Data Undercuts Trump’s D.C. Crime Narrative

Candace Owens expressed panic and called the Macrons’ lawsuit a “foreign invasion” due to its challenge to free speech, urging Trump and J.D. Vance to intervene. Owens criticized Trump’s silence, stating he should defend the First Amendment and condemn the French leader’s actions regardless of his views on the individual’s gender. She claims the lawsuit is an attempt to impoverish her for speaking her mind. The original author points out that Owens has been spreading misinformation about the First Lady of France for months.

Read More

Macron Sues Candace Owens for Defamation Over Transgender Claims

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte have initiated a defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens in Delaware, US, due to Owens’ claims that the French first lady was born male. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, accuses Owens of spreading false and defamatory information on her podcast and social media channels, including the claim that the Macrons are blood relatives and that the French President was installed by a CIA plot. The Macrons’ attorneys stated that they had requested a retraction from Owens, but resorted to legal action after she refused. The suit seeks unspecified damages and requires the Macrons to prove “actual malice” under US law.

Read More