The Pentagon announced an investigation into Senator Mark Kelly, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, following a video he recorded urging the military to disobey illegal orders. Kelly, a Navy veteran, responded that he would not be intimidated by the administration, while his colleague, Senator Ruben Gallego, condemned the investigation as “insane.” The video, along with similar ones from other Democrats, sparked outrage from the Trump administration, leading to incendiary statements from Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who referred to the lawmakers as the “Seditious Six”. Republican lawmakers have largely remained silent, despite increased threats of violence against the Democrats.
Read More
Trump doubles down on Democrats’ sedition accusation over veterans’ video.
So, here’s the deal: Trump’s been accused of sedition, and he’s not backing down. It’s like a broken record, but this time it involves a video and some strong words aimed at those who might dare to question his orders. The core of it seems to be centered around a video aimed at veterans, and the implication is that Democrats are somehow undermining the military by reminding them of their duty to the Constitution. It’s a lot to unpack, but let’s try to make sense of it.
This whole thing kicks off with Trump essentially declaring that anyone who told the military to disobey his orders should be in jail.… Continue reading
Following a video from Democratic lawmakers urging soldiers to refuse “unlawful” orders, Donald Trump ignited controversy by accusing them of “sedition” and calling for their arrest, sparking outrage among military legal professionals. These experts criticize Trump’s broad and inappropriate use of legal terms while simultaneously expressing concern over the safety of lawmakers. Although many agree that some orders, such as the US’s actions against alleged drug trafficking boats, may be illegal, military attorneys warn of the immense burden placed on service members who refuse orders and stress the need for clarification and guidance. Furthermore, the politicization of the military is highlighted as a dangerous trend, putting junior service members in a precarious position and potentially leading to a breakdown in the core principle that every order is presumed lawful.
Read More
A group of veterans and national security professionals, reaffirming their commitment to the Constitution, released a joint statement emphasizing their enduring oath to protect the United States. The statement highlighted that no threats would deter them from this obligation. They asserted that servicemembers should know they have support as they uphold their constitutional duties and follow lawful orders. The statement concluded with the historic phrase “Don’t Give Up the Ship!” and a personal response from Kelly, differentiating between defending the Constitution and an insurrection.
Read More
George Retes, a U.S. citizen and Army veteran, has publicly contested the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) account of his arrest during a federal enforcement operation. DHS claims Retes became violent and obstructed officers, leading to his arrest for assault. However, Retes alleges wrongful detention for three days without charges, an attorney, or contact with his family, stating he complied with officers’ instructions and was subjected to excessive force. He has filed claims against federal agencies, arguing DHS is attempting to demonize him for challenging government actions.
Read More
Gunman in the Michigan LDS church shooting was a veteran of the Iraq War, and this fact immediately throws a spotlight on a complex intersection of issues. The veteran status, in itself, isn’t a cause, but it invites examination of the potential impact of combat experience, PTSD, and the challenges veterans face upon returning home. The military, and particularly the experience of war, can have profound effects on mental health, and the lack of adequate mental health support is a recurring theme when such tragedies occur.
The immediate response from some political factions often involves a familiar script. Some readily frame it as a “mental health issue,” while conveniently avoiding any deeper discussions about the underlying causes or the systemic problems that might contribute to such events.… Continue reading
President Vladimir Putin has declared that the next generation of Russia’s political leaders must be veterans of the Ukraine war. This announcement, made during a meeting with the State Duma, underscores the entrenchment of hard-line Russian nationalism and reflects the existing political landscape where dissent is limited. The move signals a continuation of the prevailing political culture, potentially extending beyond Putin’s tenure. The war has already led to significant Russian troop losses and is creating social issues as veterans reintegrate into society, yet peace remains elusive with key disagreements between Russia and Ukraine remaining unresolved.
Read More
Prince Harry made a surprise visit to Kyiv at the invitation of the Ukrainian government to support the recovery of injured servicemen. He and the Invictus Games Foundation team plan to detail new initiatives aimed at expanding rehabilitation support across Ukraine. The visit includes a tour of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in World War II and meetings with veterans and Ukrainian officials. This visit aims to humanize the war’s impact and provide opportunities beyond the Invictus Games, including supplying sports equipment.
Read More
The West Point Association of Graduates has canceled its 2025 Sylvanus Thayer Award ceremony for actor Tom Hanks, a decision announced just weeks before the event. The reason for the cancellation was to allow the academy to focus on its core mission of preparing cadets. While the announcement did not give a specific reason for the cancellation, Hanks has donated to Democrats and received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. The cancellation aligns with other actions taken by political figures against perceived enemies.
Read More
The Trump administration proposed rules that would prevent the US Department of Veterans Affairs from providing abortions, even in cases of rape and incest, and forbid counseling on the matter. This has sparked significant debate, particularly among female veterans who are survivors of sexual assault, and abortion rights advocates. Critics of the proposed rules argue the exception for the mother’s life is too restrictive, potentially leading to dangerous outcomes. The VA justified the change, citing patient safety concerns and its interpretation of a 1992 law, although legal experts contest the law’s current validity. Meanwhile, Democrats have proposed legislation to counteract the regulations, but its passage is unlikely given the current political landscape.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood