U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra expressed disappointment regarding the anti-American sentiment he perceives within Canada, particularly following U.S. tariffs. Hoekstra cited a “campaign” against America as contributing to this sentiment, with Canadian politicians and experts pushing back against his claims. Flavio Volpe criticized Hoekstra’s statements, suggesting his objective lies in Washington. Conservative House Leader Andrew Scheer stated that Canadians will react negatively to aggressive foreign policy, while Finance Minister Fran çois-Philippe Champagne emphasized the economic impact of the tariffs.
Read More
Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada’s commitment to achieving the NATO two percent GDP defence spending target by March, citing the end of U.S. global dominance and a need for Canada to chart its own course. This involves a new defence industrial strategy focused on domestic production, modernizing the military with new equipment and personnel raises, and integrating the Canadian Coast Guard into the Department of National Defence. The increased spending, estimated at $18-20 billion, aims to bolster Canada’s sovereignty and will include Canada signing onto NATO’s defence industrial pledge. This marks a significant shift in Canadian defence policy, addressing previous criticism for failing to meet NATO targets.
Read More
King Charles III delivered the Speech from the Throne, opening Canada’s 45th Parliament and emphasizing Canada’s independent identity. The speech, drafted in consultation with Prime Minister Mark Carney’s office, outlined a plan for significant economic transformation, mirroring Liberal election promises. This transformation includes tax cuts, removing interprovincial trade barriers, and expedited infrastructure approvals. The King’s presence underscored Canada’s sovereignty, particularly in light of recent US rhetoric regarding annexation.
Read More
King Charles’s recent address to the Canadian Parliament underscored a significant point often overlooked: his role as the King of Canada, separate and distinct from his role as King of the United Kingdom. This visit served as a powerful demonstration of Canadian sovereignty, directly countering misconceptions about continued British influence over Canadian affairs.
The very act of King Charles addressing Parliament, with the Prime Minister seated below him, symbolically reaffirms Canada’s constitutional monarchy. It’s a visual representation of the existing governmental structure, a system that many find themselves only now fully grasping. This isn’t a subtle gesture; it’s a bold statement acknowledging Canada’s unique constitutional framework and its sovereign right to its own head of state.… Continue reading
King Charles and Queen Camilla’s two-day visit to Ottawa aimed to reaffirm Canada’s sovereignty as a distinct constitutional monarchy, countering recent suggestions of American annexation. The visit included ceremonial events such as a tree planting, symbolic of Canada’s resilience, and a street hockey game, engaging with Canadians directly. A key highlight was the King delivering the throne speech, a first for a monarch in Canada since 1977, underscoring the Crown’s role in Canadian democracy. The visit’s timing and symbolism have been interpreted as a significant statement of Canadian identity and its enduring relationship with the British monarchy.
Read More
King Charles’s upcoming visit to Canada, his first as sovereign, will serve to bolster Canadian sovereignty against perceived threats from the United States. This visit, including the unprecedented parliamentary opening, directly counters previous suggestions of Canadian annexation and reinforces Canada’s independent identity. The timing, coinciding with anti-Trump sentiment and Prime Minister Carney’s recent criticisms of a UK invitation extended to Trump, highlights the symbolic importance of the royal visit. Goodale emphasized the significance of the King’s message, stating it will strengthen the already clear message that Canada is not, and will never be, for sale.
Read More
Ambassador Pete Hoekstra’s recent comments expressing outrage over Canadians’ reduced purchase of American products highlight the simmering tensions between the U.S. and Canada. His assertion that Canada’s actions are somehow an “insult” completely misses the mark, ignoring the larger context of strained relations fueled by aggressive trade policies and thinly veiled threats of annexation.
The idea that Canada’s decreased consumption of American goods constitutes an “outrageous” act is ludicrous. It’s a market response, a natural consequence of the strained relationship and the perception of unfair trade practices originating from the United States. It wasn’t a government-mandated ban, but rather a reflection of consumer choices, a direct consequence of American actions.… Continue reading
Following UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s invitation to Donald Trump for a state visit, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney expressed Canadian disapproval, citing ongoing concerns regarding sovereignty in light of Trump’s repeated assertions about making Canada the 51st US state. Carney emphasized that the timing of the invitation was particularly insensitive. While deferring to the UK government on the appropriateness of the invitation, Carney highlighted the upcoming visit of King Charles III to Canada as a reaffirmation of their relationship. The King’s visit, including his reading of the Speech from the Throne, underscores Canada’s commitment to its own sovereignty.
Read More
Canada’s unwavering stance against any suggestion of annexation by the United States has been powerfully underscored by recent events. The firm rejection of such a proposition, so clearly stated, leaves little room for misinterpretation.
The concept of a merger, even as a hypothetical discussion point, feels profoundly inappropriate and disrespectful. It ignores the distinct identity and values Canadians hold dear. The very idea of Canada being “for sale,” as a mere commodity to be acquired, is deeply offensive.
This forceful declaration makes the subsequent comments from another figure all the more jarring. The casual dismissal of a definitive “never” with a nonchalant “never say never” showcases a stark difference in approaches.… Continue reading
Despite Prime Minister Carney’s upcoming White House meeting with President Trump to discuss trade and security, Trump continues to threaten to annex Canada as the 51st state, citing unsubstantiated claims of U.S. subsidies to Canada. Carney maintains that Canadian sovereignty is non-negotiable, while acknowledging the need for difficult but constructive discussions. Experts suggest the meeting is a positive first step but unlikely to fully resolve bilateral issues, including significant tariffs on various goods and services. The future of the Canada-U.S. relationship hinges on navigating these complex trade disputes and Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood