A Leger poll reveals that 48 percent of Canadians support mass deportations to curb illegal immigration, a figure nearing that of the United States. Simultaneously, 65 percent of Canadians believe immigration levels are excessive, a significant increase from previous years. While many recognize immigrants’ positive economic and cultural contributions, concerns about job displacement and strain on resources remain prevalent. Despite these concerns, Canada exhibits less polarization on immigration issues than the United States.
Read More
Canada’s recent decision to launch advertisements warning of the difficulties in securing asylum reflects a significant shift in the country’s immigration policy. The influx of several million people within a short period has overwhelmed resources at both the federal and provincial levels. This rapid population growth has exacerbated existing challenges, most notably in housing, wages, and overall productivity.
The situation is complex, involving various contributing factors beyond simply the number of newcomers. Government policies, such as the freezing of post-secondary tuition for domestic students, unexpectedly increased the number of international students. Simultaneously, the Temporary Foreign Workers program also contributed to a surge in population.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s proposed mass deportation plan, involving the potential use of the U.S. military, has drawn sharp criticism and raised serious concerns. While the Pentagon has dismissed the proposal as unrealistic, Trump and his allies, including former ICE director Thomas Homan, have advocated for military assistance in expelling millions of undocumented immigrants. The plan, potentially costing hundreds of billions of dollars, would represent a radical shift in the role of the military and raise significant legal and logistical hurdles. Experts highlight the immense financial and societal implications of such a massive undertaking.
Read More
Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham offered President-elect Trump a 1,402-acre border ranch for deportation facilities, pledging support for mass deportations, a key Trump campaign promise. The land, previously used for agriculture, is strategically located near the Rio Grande and airports. Buckingham cited the property’s ease of development and its proximity to the border as reasons for the offer, despite data contradicting claims of high crime rates among immigrants. The offer follows Trump’s announced plans to use the military to assist in widespread deportations.
Read More
The Los Angeles City Council unanimously approved a sanctuary city ordinance, codifying existing protections for immigrants by prohibiting city resources from being used for immigration enforcement and preventing information sharing with federal authorities. This measure, supported by Mayor Bass, aims to protect immigrant communities and ensure they can safely report crimes without fear of deportation. While the city already largely avoids cooperation with federal immigration authorities, the ordinance formally enshrines these protections into law, mirroring similar state-level legislation in California. The ordinance’s passage comes in anticipation of potential increased immigration enforcement under the current administration.
Read More
Facing criticism for policies contributing to housing shortages, inflation, and strained public services, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged mistakes in his government’s immigration approach. The government’s rapid increase in immigration, intended to address labor shortages, inadvertently allowed exploitation by “bad actors” such as fake colleges and corporations. To rectify this, Canada will significantly reduce both permanent and temporary immigration over the next three years, prioritizing skilled workers in crucial sectors. This temporary reduction aims to alleviate pressure on housing and infrastructure while the country works towards expanding its capacity.
Read More
Donald Trump plans to utilize emergency powers and the military for mass deportations, a key promise of his 2024 campaign. This extreme measure, while facing anticipated legal challenges, benefits from a more conservative Supreme Court and a judiciary increasingly filled with Trump appointees. The plan aims to deport individuals regardless of criminal history, potentially impacting legal residents as well, through measures like ending birthright citizenship. Despite logistical hurdles, Trump’s past actions suggest a willingness to implement such drastic, controversial policies.
Read More
The Trump administration’s renewed focus on denaturalization represents a significant escalation of its anti-immigrant agenda. This effort, spearheaded by figures like Stephen Miller, aims to revoke the citizenship of naturalized US citizens, even those who have held their citizenship for decades. The process relies on investigating past naturalization applications for alleged fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit.
This targeting of naturalized citizens is deeply troubling, evoking historical parallels to oppressive regimes that stripped individuals of their rights based on ethnicity or origin. The potential for widespread abuse is undeniable, particularly considering the lack of a guaranteed right to legal counsel in denaturalization proceedings.… Continue reading
Economists predict that two of Donald Trump’s key campaign promises—mass deportations and increased tariffs—would significantly increase food prices in the United States. Deporting undocumented immigrants, who comprise a substantial portion of the agricultural workforce, would cause labor shortages leading to higher wages and subsequently higher prices for domestically grown produce. Simultaneously, tariffs on imported food would further elevate costs for consumers, as there’s no mechanism to offset the combined impact of labor shortages and import taxes. This price increase would affect a wide range of food products, from fruits and vegetables to dairy and meat, impacting all segments of the food supply chain.
Read More
During a recent podcast, I argued that a merciful approach to border security involves shooting and killing migrants who approach the wall after being warned, thereby deterring further illegal immigration. This “Biblical Justice,” I contend, would punish a few while deterring many, preventing the suffering of families separated during deportation. My proposal, however, is far outside of mainstream Republican policy, despite my support for President Trump. I believe a complete halt to immigration is necessary, and this drastic measure would achieve that goal.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood