Kris Harrison led his daughter to his bedroom where he kept a Glock handgun, stating he had purchased it for home defense and believed Texas law did not require a license. Despite Harrison’s claim that his daughter requested to see the gun, evidence suggested she was aware of its presence and disagreed with it. Harrison admitted to drinking wine earlier that day and stated that as he lifted the gun to show her, it discharged, causing her immediate death. A US grand jury subsequently determined there was insufficient evidence to charge anyone in connection with the incident.
Read More
It appears that there’s a concerning development unfolding regarding gun ownership and travel into Washington D.C., with reports suggesting potential jail time for lawful gun owners who bring firearms into the city. This situation raises significant questions about Second Amendment rights, the interpretation of gun laws, and the shifting stances on gun control, particularly within certain political circles. The very idea of lawful citizens facing incarceration for exercising what they perceive as their constitutional rights is inherently troubling and warrants a closer look at the motivations and implications behind such pronouncements.
The core of this issue seems to revolve around the District of Columbia’s gun control regulations, which have historically been quite strict, often not recognizing permits from other states.… Continue reading
The article explores how the Second Amendment has historically been applied unevenly, particularly for Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities. From colonial times, gun laws and enforcement were used to control and disarm these groups, reinforcing racial hierarchies. The Second Amendment was often a “bribe” to the South to ensure its security, while also enabling the disarmament of Indigenous communities. Today, the enforcement of gun laws and who is considered a “good guy with a gun” still often falls along racial lines. This is shown through the disparate treatment of armed individuals and the disproportionate targeting of people of color in police shootings.
Read More
In Minneapolis and across the country, credible journalism is essential for fostering public trust. Reliable reporting demands adherence to factual accuracy, regardless of the resistance encountered from influential entities. This commitment to truth-seeking is crucial for upholding the public’s right to information. Therefore, supporting journalism that prioritizes the facts is paramount for a just society.
Read More
Jon Stewart expressed outrage at the right-wing’s attempts to justify the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by focusing on his legal firearm. He highlighted the hypocrisy, contrasting the current stance with the right’s previous defense of individuals like Kyle Rittenhouse. Stewart sarcastically questioned whether the right was abandoning its Second Amendment principles, especially given their willingness to sacrifice core values for Donald Trump. Ultimately, Stewart found it most shocking that the right had abandoned its entire political worldview for someone they believe does not care.
Read More
NRA Reminds Country Guns Are Required To Fend Off Government
The NRA’s long-standing position, echoed in recent discussions, is that the Second Amendment isn’t just about self-defense; it’s about the right of citizens to defend themselves against potential government overreach. This perspective, however, sparks intense debate, particularly when the lines between self-defense and potential conflict blur. The core of their argument is that an armed citizenry serves as a check on government power, a final safeguard against tyranny.
The recent case, where an individual carrying a pistol was killed by law enforcement, has reignited this conversation. The NRA’s response, and that of many gun rights advocates, highlights a deep-seated fear of government overreach and a belief that armed citizens are a necessary bulwark against it.… Continue reading
Australia’s lower house has responded swiftly to the tragedy of the Bondi mass shooting, and the path forward is clear: tougher gun control laws. This isn’t just a knee-jerk reaction; it’s a decisive move to address a devastating event and reaffirm the nation’s commitment to public safety. The legislation is focused on strengthening existing frameworks, with a particular emphasis on tightening firearm licensing, bolstering background checks, and introducing more stringent safeguards to prevent similar incidents from happening again.
The recent events have underscored the unique cultural context in Australia. Unlike in some other nations, the Australian approach to gun control is not a debate over the very existence of restrictions, but rather a discussion of how robust those restrictions should be.… Continue reading
Hawaii’s stringent gun laws are the subject of upcoming arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court, specifically regarding the state’s ban on firearms on private property open to the public without explicit owner permission. The case stems from a 2023 lawsuit challenging new laws restricting gun carrying in various public places, with plaintiffs arguing Second Amendment rights infringements. The Supreme Court will focus on the default rule disallowing guns on private property unless explicitly permitted. The central debate revolves around the balance between the right to self-defense and the right to keep firearms off private property, with arguments drawing upon historical traditions and cultural perspectives on gun ownership.
Read More
The recent court ruling declaring California’s ban on openly carrying guns unconstitutional has sparked a lot of debate. It’s a complex issue, with strong opinions on both sides. The crux of the matter seems to be rooted in the Second Amendment and its interpretation in the context of historical practices.
The court’s decision hinges on a new legal test established by the Supreme Court in the *New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen* case. This test mandates that any restrictions on firearms must be “consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” Essentially, the court is saying that if open carry was a common practice when the Second Amendment was written, then a state ban is likely unconstitutional.… Continue reading
This year marks a historic milestone for the Republic of Ireland, as there have been no recorded gun killings. This is the first time in nearly six decades that such a statistic has been achieved. Historically, gun violence was more prevalent, particularly during the Troubles and the peak of drug-related crime. The last year without a gun-related fatality was 1968, highlighting the significance of the recent achievement.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood