In response to the U.S. imposing 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, Canada will immediately retaliate with 25% tariffs on $30 billion worth of American products, followed by an additional $125 billion in tariffs within 21 days. Prime Minister Trudeau warned that these tariffs will harm both Canadian and American citizens, potentially impacting jobs and consumer prices in the U.S. The tariffs stem from a U.S. effort to combat fentanyl trafficking and illegal immigration, though specific benchmarks for removal remain unclear. Trudeau emphasized the importance of carefully considering any further retaliatory measures, particularly those impacting specific Canadian regions.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s imposition of $155 billion in tariffs on Canadian goods, Prime Minister Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs totaling the same amount. These counter-tariffs will be implemented in two phases, beginning with $30 billion in tariffs on Tuesday, followed by an additional $125 billion in 21 days. The targeted goods include a wide range of consumer products and materials, impacting everyday items such as alcohol, clothing, and household appliances. This action comes after failed attempts to communicate with President Trump, and Trudeau urged Canadians to support local businesses amidst the escalating trade conflict.
Read More
President Trump issued executive orders imposing 25% tariffs on all goods from Mexico and Canada, and a 10% tariff on Canadian oil and Chinese imports, citing the opioid crisis and illegal immigration as justification. These tariffs, effective immediately, include a retaliation clause to escalate if trade partners retaliate with their own tariffs. The decision, made without prior negotiation, has drawn significant criticism for potentially sparking a trade war and raising consumer prices. Despite claims that tariffs stimulate success, economists warn of negative economic consequences for both the U.S. and its trading partners, including potential recessions in Mexico and increased costs of living in the US.
Read More
Mexico anticipates the potential imposition of 25% tariffs on its goods, viewing a trade war as avoidable and detrimental to both nations. While acknowledging the severity of the drug trafficking problem and the accusations levied by the White House, the Mexican government maintains a calm approach, emphasizing the harm tariffs would inflict on the U.S. economy. President Sheinbaum’s administration, recently inaugurated, has appointed a respected public security minister to address these concerns. Ultimately, Mexico hopes to engage in constructive dialogue with the U.S., despite the current tense atmosphere and the Trump administration’s aggressive tactics.
Read More
Trump’s decision to impose 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico is baffling, a reckless act of economic self-sabotage that defies logic and reason. It’s not just a trade dispute; it’s an assault on decades of mutually beneficial relationships, built on trust and cooperation. The sheer absurdity of this move is enough to make anyone question the sanity of the decision-making process at the highest levels of the US government.
This isn’t a targeted strike against a specific trade imbalance or unfair practice. There’s no coherent justification for such a drastic measure against two close allies, nations with whom the US shares extensive economic ties and vital supply chains.… Continue reading
President Trump imposed a 25% tariff on nearly all Canadian goods, along with a 10% tariff on energy products, citing concerns about fentanyl and migration. This unprecedented action, effective Tuesday, is predicted to severely impact Canada’s GDP and potentially trigger a recession. Canada plans retaliatory tariffs, with Prime Minister Trudeau expected to announce specific measures. The intertwined economies of Canada and the U.S. will face significant consequences, affecting businesses, workers, and consumers on both sides of the border.
Read More
President Trump’s announcement of new tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China caused a market reversal, with the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones Industrial Average all experiencing significant losses after initial gains. These 25 percent (Canada and Mexico) and 10 percent (China) tariffs, effective immediately, are intended to address unfair trade practices but risk harming U.S. businesses and consumers. Further tariffs on computer chips, oil, gas, copper, and goods from the European Union are planned, adding to investor anxiety about the economic consequences. This market volatility follows already slowing global economic growth and mixed corporate earnings reports.
Read More
Following previous threats, Trump confirmed plans to impose substantial tariffs on the European Union, though specifics remain undisclosed. This action mirrors his previous imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum, which triggered retaliatory measures from the EU. The EU, America’s second-largest trading partner, has indicated it will again retaliate against any new tariffs. Simultaneously, Trump announced additional tariffs on Canadian, Mexican, and Chinese goods, effective immediately.
Read More
Liberal Party leadership frontrunner Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, vows to retaliate against President Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canadian imports with dollar-for-dollar counter-tariffs. Carney asserts Canada will not yield to bullying tactics and that the tariffs will negatively impact the US economy by damaging its reputation, hindering growth, and increasing inflation. This action marks the second time in less than a decade the US has disrupted a major trade agreement with Canada, following the renegotiation of NAFTA. The upcoming Canadian federal election, slated for October 2024, will be significantly impacted by this trade dispute.
Read More
South Dakota’s agricultural economy, heavily reliant on exports to China and Mexico, is highly vulnerable to Trump’s protectionist trade policies. Trump’s past tariffs severely damaged the state, highlighting the potential for similar economic harm under his current approach. Senator Thune, representing South Dakota, acknowledges differing views on tariffs within the administration, advocating for targeted application rather than widespread trade wars. Pressure mounts on Thune to moderate the President’s stance to prevent significant economic damage to his constituents.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood