In response to new US tariffs on various imported goods, Canada has implemented reciprocal 25% tariffs on select US automobile imports and parts. These retaliatory measures, announced by Finance Minister Champagne, target vehicles and components non-compliant with the CUSMA agreement or containing non-Canadian/Mexican content. The action follows President Trump’s imposition of global tariffs and ongoing trade disputes with Canada. This tit-for-tat escalation comes amidst heightened tensions between the two North American neighbours.
Read More
Canada’s tariffs against the United States will remain in place until the US demonstrates a genuine respect for Canada, a stance that signals a firm and unwavering position on the matter. This isn’t simply about economic policy; it’s about demanding respectful treatment in international relations. The decision to maintain these tariffs reflects a calculated strategy, aiming to create a degree of certainty in the markets, a stark contrast to the unpredictable nature of past US trade policies. The erratic on-again, off-again approach to tariffs destabilizes international trade and causes unnecessary uncertainty for businesses. By holding firm, Canada seeks to end this inconsistency.… Continue reading
President Trump temporarily exempted auto tariffs on Mexico and Canada for one month, yielding to pressure from Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis to avoid financial harm. This reprieve, however, does not affect other existing 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods. The exemption is intended to allow automakers time to shift production to the US, a goal the administration hopes to achieve. Despite the temporary relief, Canada remains opposed to any tariffs on its goods.
Read More
Canada’s unwavering stance is clear: all US tariffs must be lifted before Canada will consider removing its own retaliatory measures. This firm position reflects a calculated strategy, a refusal to be intimidated by aggressive trade tactics. It’s a bold move, especially considering the economic interdependence between the two nations. However, the underlying sentiment seems to be one of frustration, a feeling that the US has initiated a trade war unnecessarily and without proper justification.
This unwavering position suggests a deep-seated belief that the US is the aggressor in this situation. The perception isn’t just that tariffs were levied; the feeling is that the entire process was an unprovoked attack, a bullying tactic intended to leverage the US’s economic power.… Continue reading
In response to President Trump’s announcement of 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, Prime Minister Trudeau declared retaliatory tariffs on $155 billion worth of American products, effective immediately. These tariffs will initially target $30 billion in goods, with the remaining $125 billion to follow within 21 days. Trudeau cited the unjustified nature of the U.S. tariffs, emphasizing the minimal contribution of Canadian fentanyl to the U.S. problem. The Canadian Prime Minister warned that these actions will negatively impact American consumers and businesses, disrupting a vital trade relationship.
Read More
On March 4th, 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports will be reinstated, alongside an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods, bringing the total to 20%. This decision, announced by President Trump on Truth Social, cites persistently high levels of illicit drug imports despite neighboring countries’ efforts. The April 2nd reciprocal tariff date remains unchanged. This announcement contradicts earlier statements from the White House National Economic Council Director suggesting a later decision on tariff policy.
Read More
Trump says Mexico, Canada tariffs to take effect March 4, a date that has seen several postponements and reversals, leaving businesses and investors in a state of constant uncertainty. This announcement, a shift from a previously announced April deadline, has sparked a wave of reactions ranging from outrage to cynical amusement. The sheer unpredictability of the situation is unsettling, making it challenging for businesses to plan for the future.
Trump says Mexico, Canada tariffs to take effect March 4, but the lack of a clear, consistent policy is causing significant problems. The constant back-and-forth creates an unreliable business environment, leading companies to question whether they can depend on the United States as a trading partner.… Continue reading
Trump’s decision to delay imposing tariffs on Mexico and Canada until March 1st has sent shockwaves, or perhaps more accurately, ripples of weary resignation, through the political landscape. The delay itself feels less like a strategic maneuver and more like a reprieve, a temporary postponement of an inevitable, yet ultimately avoidable, conflict.
The initial announcement of the tariffs felt arbitrary, a sudden outburst seemingly unconnected to any coherent economic strategy. It felt as though the idea was tossed out casually, the potential consequences not fully considered, or perhaps conveniently disregarded. The subsequent reactions from Mexico and Canada, however, suggest the initial proclamation was a miscalculation; a blustering attempt at leverage that backfired.… Continue reading
The Shopping Trends team operates independently from CTV News journalists. This team may receive commission on purchases made via provided links. Full details regarding the team’s operations are available via a linked page.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood