Despite President Trump’s one-month postponement of 25% tariffs on many Canadian imports, Canada will maintain its initial $21 billion in retaliatory tariffs on various American goods. A planned second wave of Canadian tariffs totaling $87 billion has been suspended, contingent on the continued postponement of US tariffs. However, Ontario and British Columbia have implemented separate, independent retaliatory measures, indicating a continued firm stance against Trump’s trade actions. Prime Minister Trudeau anticipates a prolonged trade conflict.
Read More
Brown-Forman CEO Lawson Whiting criticized Canada’s removal of US alcohol from shelves as a disproportionate response to US tariffs on Canadian goods, deeming it more damaging than the tariffs themselves. This action, taken by provinces including Ontario’s LCBO, eliminates US alcohol sales completely. While impacting Brown-Forman, the loss represents only 1% of its overall sales. The Canadian government’s retaliatory tariffs, alongside provincial actions, target US beer, spirits, and wine.
Read More
Following President Trump’s imposition of new tariffs on Canadian imports, Prime Minister Trudeau firmly rejected any compromise, demanding the complete removal of all U.S. tariffs. This stance was echoed by key Canadian officials, including Finance Minister LeBlanc and Ontario Premier Ford, who emphasized Canada’s unwillingness to negotiate a reduction in tariffs. While the U.S. administration initially showed signs of softening its position, Secretary Lutnick confirmed that tariffs would remain, though potential exemptions were being considered. The escalating trade war prompted immediate retaliatory measures from Canada, including provincial bans on American alcohol, and sparked significant economic anxieties.
Read More
Canada’s unwavering stance is clear: all US tariffs must be lifted before Canada will consider removing its own retaliatory measures. This firm position reflects a calculated strategy, a refusal to be intimidated by aggressive trade tactics. It’s a bold move, especially considering the economic interdependence between the two nations. However, the underlying sentiment seems to be one of frustration, a feeling that the US has initiated a trade war unnecessarily and without proper justification.
This unwavering position suggests a deep-seated belief that the US is the aggressor in this situation. The perception isn’t just that tariffs were levied; the feeling is that the entire process was an unprovoked attack, a bullying tactic intended to leverage the US’s economic power.… Continue reading
In response to President Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to retaliate by cutting off energy exports to the U.S., apologizing to the American people while emphasizing that the issue stems from presidential action, not the American people themselves. Ford affirmed a unified approach with the federal government, vowing to fight back aggressively against these tariffs, leveraging Canada’s significant energy exports to the U.S. This strong stance mirrors Prime Minister Trudeau’s announcement of retaliatory tariffs on US imports totaling C$155 billion, demonstrating a determined Canadian response to the trade dispute. Both leaders emphasize the need for strong countermeasures to protect the Canadian economy.
Read More
A senior Canadian official stated that Prime Minister Trudeau will not lift Canada’s retaliatory tariffs unless the U.S. removes all its tariffs on Canadian goods. This rejects a proposed “middle ground” settlement suggested by U.S. Commerce Secretary Lutnick. The official did not address potential partial tariff reductions. The U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on most Canadian imports, while Canada responded with tariffs on $30 billion in U.S. goods, with further increases planned. Trudeau has vehemently rejected the U.S.’s justification for the tariffs, citing the minimal amount of fentanyl trafficked across the border.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s tariffs on Canadian goods, Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced several retaliatory measures. These include cancelling a $100 million contract with Starlink, banning U.S. companies from provincial procurement contracts, and threatening a 25 percent surcharge on electricity exports to border states. Furthermore, the province’s liquor retailer, the LCBO, will cease purchasing American alcohol. These actions are in addition to the federal government’s own retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.
Read More
In response to the U.S. imposing 25% tariffs on Mexican goods, Mexico announced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. products, with specifics to be revealed Sunday. This delay suggests a potential effort to de-escalate the trade conflict initiated by President Trump. Mexico’s president rejected the U.S.’s accusations regarding drug trafficking, highlighting the country’s efforts to combat cartels. While economists express concern about the potential negative economic impacts for both nations, the Mexican government aims to leverage national unity and the president’s high approval ratings in its response.
Read More
Following the announcement of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau addressed the American public. His message likely aimed to clarify Canada’s position and the reasons behind its actions. The retaliatory tariffs were a direct response to U.S. trade policies impacting Canadian industries. The specifics of Trudeau’s message and its reception remain to be seen.
Read More
Following the US imposition of 25% tariffs on most Canadian goods, Prime Minister Trudeau declared Canada would not back down from the ensuing trade war. He rejected the US rationale as unfounded, highlighting Canada’s strengthened border security measures. Retaliatory tariffs, totaling tens of billions of dollars, have been implemented by Canada, with provinces also enacting their own countermeasures, such as export taxes. The economic impact will be widespread, affecting both countries, and Canada is actively seeking to leverage its northern critical mineral resources to enhance its economic position and negotiating power.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood