India has informed the WTO of its plan to impose retaliatory tariffs totaling nearly $724 million on the U.S. due to increased U.S. tariffs on specific Indian automobiles and parts. This move, detailed in a communication to the WTO, comes amid ongoing negotiations for a mini-trade deal between the two countries. India argues that the U.S. tariffs violate WTO agreements and reserves the right to suspend concessions equivalent to the adverse effects on Indian trade. The proposed tariff increases on selected U.S. products aim to offset the $723.75 million in duties resulting from the U.S. measures, which impact roughly $2.89 billion of Indian imports annually.
Read More
In response to continued US tariffs on Indian steel and aluminum, imposed under the guise of national security, India has proposed retaliatory duties under WTO rules. These duties, targeting $7.6 billion in US imports, aim to recoup an equivalent amount of lost revenue. India previously sought consultations with the US through the WTO’s safeguard agreement, arguing the tariffs are inconsistent with GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards. Failing to resolve the issue through consultation, India reserves the right to implement these countermeasures after a 30-day waiting period.
Read More
Facing stalled trade negotiations with the U.S., the European Union plans to impose approximately €100 billion in retaliatory tariffs on American goods. These tariffs would target various sectors, including industrial goods, agricultural products, and notably, Boeing aircraft. The proposed levies aim to counter existing U.S. tariffs and address what the EU views as an uneven playing field, particularly concerning Airbus. This action follows minimal progress in talks and reflects the EU’s increasing concern over the significant portion of its exports now subject to U.S. tariffs.
Read More
China implemented a 125% retaliatory tariff on US imports, escalating the ongoing trade war. The Chinese Finance Ministry condemned the US tariffs as “bullying” and a violation of international trade rules. While the White House clarified the combined US tariff rate on China as 145%, neither country shows signs of de-escalation. Analysts note market reactions reflecting increased economic decoupling, though some believe the risk of a severe downturn is lessened. The new tariffs are effective immediately.
Read More
In response to Trump’s 20% tariff on EU goods, later reduced to 10%, the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen suspended planned retaliatory tariffs of €20.9 billion on US exports, prioritizing negotiations. This decision, however, is conditional; the EU maintains its right to impose countermeasures if negotiations prove unsatisfactory, and preparations for such measures continue. The EU’s measured approach reflects a need for internal consensus among member states and legal justification before enacting retaliatory tariffs. This deliberate pace underscores the political sensitivity involved in trade policy decisions within the European Union.
Read More
In response to US tariffs on steel and aluminum, the EU implemented €22 billion in retaliatory tariffs on various US goods, with only Hungary dissenting. These duties, ranging from 10-25%, will be phased in throughout the year, targeting products such as tobacco, motorcycles, and poultry. The decision follows rejected negotiations with the US, and the EU anticipates further retaliatory measures if a trade agreement isn’t reached. These escalating tariffs reflect growing global trade tensions fueled by protectionist policies.
Read More
In response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, the European Union approved retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, effective April 15th and May 15th. These countermeasures target a range of products including poultry, grains, clothing, and metals, aiming to protect European businesses and consumers from the economic harm caused by the U.S. actions. The EU emphasized its preference for a negotiated solution with the U.S., stating that the retaliatory tariffs could be suspended if a fair agreement is reached. This action comes after President Trump imposed tariffs on a wide range of EU imports.
Read More
In response to U.S. tariffs on Canadian automobiles, Canada imposed retaliatory tariffs of 25 percent on U.S.-assembled vehicles, effective April 9th. These tariffs target vehicles with non-Canadian or non-Mexican content, impacting approximately 1.2 million vehicles annually imported from the U.S., Canada’s largest automotive export market. The counter-tariffs, potentially increasing Canadian vehicle prices by 15-25 percent, will remain in effect until the U.S. removes its tariffs. This escalation stems from President Trump’s earlier imposition of tariffs on Canadian-made autos and auto parts.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s trade war, Canada has implemented substantial counter-tariffs on US goods, totaling over C$95 billion (€61.1bn), the largest amount imposed by any country. These measures, including retaliatory tariffs on US vehicles, aim to pressure the Trump administration to reconsider its policies. Canada is collaborating with international partners, including the EU and Asian nations, to maximize pressure and believes that public pressure within the US is crucial to resolving the conflict. The minister emphasized the importance of a unified NATO to counter the potential benefits accruing to adversaries like China and Russia from Western divisions.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of EU exports, the European Commission will unveil a list targeting up to €400 billion worth of US goods. This retaliatory measure, to be voted on by member states on Wednesday, initially focuses on the steel and aluminum tariffs, with further action on other tariffs to be considered later. The list, which may exclude certain products such as bourbon following lobbying efforts, aims for a proportionate response while acknowledging the need for a negotiated solution. The EU’s response comes amid global market turmoil and concerns of a potential global downturn.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker